Literature DB >> 27992952

Gross primary production responses to warming, elevated CO2 , and irrigation: quantifying the drivers of ecosystem physiology in a semiarid grassland.

Edmund M Ryan1, Kiona Ogle2,3, Drew Peltier3, Anthony P Walker4, Martin G De Kauwe5, Belinda E Medlyn6, David G Williams7, William Parton8, Shinichi Asao8, Bertrand Guenet9, Anna B Harper10, Xingjie Lu11, Kristina A Luus12, Sönke Zaehle12, Shijie Shu13, Christian Werner14, Jianyang Xia15,16, Elise Pendall6,7.   

Abstract

Determining whether the terrestrial biosphere will be a source or sink of carbon (C) under a future climate of elevated CO2 (eCO2 ) and warming requires accurate quantification of gross primary production (GPP), the largest flux of C in the global C cycle. We evaluated 6 years (2007-2012) of flux-derived GPP data from the Prairie Heating and CO2 Enrichment (PHACE) experiment, situated in a grassland in Wyoming, USA. The GPP data were used to calibrate a light response model whose basic formulation has been successfully used in a variety of ecosystems. The model was extended by modeling maximum photosynthetic rate (Amax ) and light-use efficiency (Q) as functions of soil water, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, vegetation greenness, and nitrogen at current and antecedent (past) timescales. The model fits the observed GPP well (R2  = 0.79), which was confirmed by other model performance checks that compared different variants of the model (e.g. with and without antecedent effects). Stimulation of cumulative 6-year GPP by warming (29%, P = 0.02) and eCO2 (26%, P = 0.07) was primarily driven by enhanced C uptake during spring (129%, P = 0.001) and fall (124%, P = 0.001), respectively, which was consistent across years. Antecedent air temperature (Tairant ) and vapor pressure deficit (VPDant ) effects on Amax (over the past 3-4 days and 1-3 days, respectively) were the most significant predictors of temporal variability in GPP among most treatments. The importance of VPDant suggests that atmospheric drought is important for predicting GPP under current and future climate; we highlight the need for experimental studies to identify the mechanisms underlying such antecedent effects. Finally, posterior estimates of cumulative GPP under control and eCO2 treatments were tested as a benchmark against 12 terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs). The narrow uncertainties of these data-driven GPP estimates suggest that they could be useful semi-independent data streams for validating TBMs.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modeling; carbon cycle; elevated CO2; grasslands; gross primary production; multifactor global change experiment; warming

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27992952     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  2 in total

1.  Rainfall pulse response of carbon fluxes in a temperate grass ecosystem in the semiarid Loess Plateau.

Authors:  Yakun Tang; Jun Jiang; Chen Chen; Yunming Chen; Xu Wu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Elevated CO2 and Warming Altered Grassland Microbial Communities in Soil Top-Layers.

Authors:  Hao Yu; Ye Deng; Zhili He; Joy D Van Nostrand; Shang Wang; Decai Jin; Aijie Wang; Liyou Wu; Daohan Wang; Xin Tai; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.