| Literature DB >> 27992603 |
Bernard Marius 't Hart, Denise Y P Henriques.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163556.].Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27992603 PMCID: PMC5167415 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Block Order.
Blocks were performed from top to bottom, with two extra blocks in the rotated session. Trial numbers during training are larger in the rotated as compared to the aligned sessions. Passive localization tasks always follow the active localization tasks, since the robot moved the hand to the same arc-location in the passive condition as that produced by the participant in the active version. Before every localization task, training was reinforced, to minimize any decay in learning.
| task | aligned | rotated |
|---|---|---|
| № trials | ||
| training | 50 | 90 |
| no-cursor reaches | - | 21 |
| training | - | 60 |
| active delayed | 25 | 25 |
| no-cursor reaches | 21 | 21 |
| training | 10 | 60 |
| passive delayed | 25 | 25 |
| no-cursor reaches | 21 | 21 |
| training | 10 | 60 |
| active online | 25 | 25 |
| no-cursor reaches | 21 | 21 |
| training | 10 | 60 |
| passive online | 25 | 25 |
| no-cursor reaches | 21 | 21 |