| Literature DB >> 27992520 |
Yusuke Shiode1, Yuki Morizane1, Shinji Toshima1, Shuhei Kimura1, Fumiaki Kumase1, Mio Hosokawa1, Masayuki Hirano1, Shinichiro Doi1, Kosuke Takahashi1, Mika Hosogi1, Atsushi Fujiwara1, Fumio Shiraga1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence ratio, localization, and surgical outcomes of intraretinal cystic spaces in idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERMs).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27992520 PMCID: PMC5167544 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow Chart of Idiopathic ERM Case Selection and Follow-up in 432 Eyes.
ERM, epiretinal membrane.
Fig 2Representative ERM Cases of Each Group by Intraretinal Cyst Location.
Panels (A–B) show examples of images from the group with no cysts (i.e., the no cyst group): A; pre-operation, B; post-operation. Panels (C–D) show examples of cases from the group with cystic spaces in the inner retina (i.e., the inner group): C; pre-operation, D; post-operation. Cystic spaces (arrows) partially remained after surgery. Panels (E–F) show examples of cases from the group with cystic spaces in the outer retina (i.e., the outer group): E; pre-operation, F; post-operation. Cystic spaces in the Henle layer (arrowhead) disappeared completely after surgery. Panels (G–H) show examples of cases from the group with cystic spaces in both the inner and outer retina (i.e., the combined group): G; pre-operation, H; post-operation. Some cystic spaces in the inner retinal layers (arrows) remained after surgery. ERM, epiretinal membrane.
Baseline Demographics and Clinical Data for All Groups.
| No cyst group | Inner group | Outer group | Combined group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (30 eyes) | (9 eyes) | (6 eyes) | (9 eyes) | |
| Age (years) | 68.8 ± 6.4 | 72.4 ± 4.4 | 71.7 ± 5.5 | 67.4 ± 6.7 |
| Sex (male / female) | 12 / 18 | 2 / 7 | 5 / 1 | 6 / 3 |
| LogMAR BCVA | 0.179 ± 0.15 | 0.285 ± 0.26 | 0.223 ± 0.15 | 0.456 ± 0.33* |
| (Snellen equivalent) | (20/32) | (20/39) | (20/32) | (20/52) |
| CRT (μm) | 410 ± 83.5 | 501 ± 56.4 | 391 ± 46.2 | 554 ± 134.3* |
| Cases with disruption of EZ (%) | 3.3 | 11.1 | 0 | 33. 3* |
| Cases with disruption of ELM (%) | 3.3 | 0 | 0 | 33. 3* |
LogMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CRT, central retinal thickness. EZ, Ellipsoid zone. ELM, External limiting membrane. All data are presented as means ± SD.
Asterisk represents a significant difference (P < 0.05) from the no cyst group.
Fig 3Comparison of Visual Acuity and Central Retinal Thickness at Baseline and at 6 months After Vitrectomy.
A: Best-corrected visual acuities (BCVA) in logMAR value in all groups at baseline and 6 months after surgery. logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. B: Central retinal thickness (CRT) in all groups at baseline and 6 months after surgery. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.