Literature DB >> 27992117

Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites.

Sabine C Hansen1,2, Caroline Stolter2, Christian Imholt1, Jens Jacob1.   

Abstract

Rodents, including common voles (Microtus arvalis) and house mice (Mus musculus) cause immense pre-harvest and post-harvest losses. Therefore, developing methods that mitigate these losses while maintaining their role in ecosystems is a priority. Several plant secondary metabolites (PSM) which significantly reduce food intake of both species under laboratory conditions have been identified. However, before these can be used in rodent pest management, they must be tested under more natural conditions where other food sources are available. In this study, the odors of 4 PSMs were evaluated for their repellent effects in experiments conducted in semi-natural enclosures. Soil treated with PSMs or untreated soil (experimental control) was placed in an underground box containing food (rolled oats). We quantified the number of visits to each box and could demonstrate that all 4 PSMs reduced the number of visits to treatment boxes in both rodent species. For common voles the combination of methyl nonyl ketone + black pepper oil was the most repellent PSM. House mice made fewer visits to all PSM boxes; boxes with the anthraquinone were visited least. Furthermore, house mice consumed less food from boxes containing soil treated with all 4 PSMs. Our results suggest that PSMs are repellent in murid and microtine rodents under semi-field conditions. In addition, the future use of PSM odors for repelling both pest species, especially house mice, seems promising. Further investigations with other PSMs, different concentrations as well as alternative application methods are needed to repel common voles from attractive crops.
© 2016 International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enclosure trials; odor; plant secondary metabolites; repellents; rodents

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27992117     DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Zool        ISSN: 1749-4869            Impact factor:   2.654


  2 in total

1.  Small Animals, Big Impact? Early Farmers and Pre- and Post-Harvest Pests from the Middle Neolithic Site of Les Bagnoles in the South-East of France (L'Isle-sur-la-Sorgue, Vaucluse, Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur).

Authors:  Simone Häberle; Marguerita Schäfer; Raül Soteras; Héctor Martínez-Grau; Irka Hajdas; Stefanie Jacomet; Brigitte Röder; Jörg Schibler; Samuel van Willigen; Ferran Antolín
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 2.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Inhibitory Effects of Plant-Derived Sterilants on Rodent Population Abundance.

Authors:  Xuanye Wen; Shuai Yuan; Limei Li; Quanhua Dai; Li Yang; Fan Jiang; Xiao Lin
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.075

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.