Greice Letícia Toso1, Lidiane Golle2, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza Magnago3, Gerli Elenise Gehrke Herr2,4, Marli Maria Loro4, Fabiele Aozane2,3, Adriane Cristina Bernat Kolankiewicz4. 1. Associação Hospital de Caridade de Ijuí. Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 2. Hospital Unimed Noroeste. Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 3. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Enfermagem, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 4. Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI), Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Graduação em Enfermagem e Pós-Graduação em Atenção Integral à Saúde. Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the atmosphere regarding patient safety from the perspective of active nurses in hospitals in a country town of Rio Grande do Sul State. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 637 nursing professionals from two hospitals. Data collection through Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, in the second half of 2014. Cutoff for positive assessment was ≥75 points. RESULTS: The scores for domains in the overall assessment were: 76 (team work atmosphere), 73 (safety atmosphere), 88 (job satisfaction), 59 (perceived stress), 66 (perception of unit management), 65 (perception of hospital management) and 80 (work conditions). When comparing averages between institutions, the private institution showed better working conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Results can be used to plan and organize actions, given the low scores in relation to the safety atmosphere, management and stress perception.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the atmosphere regarding patient safety from the perspective of active nurses in hospitals in a country town of Rio Grande do Sul State. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 637 nursing professionals from two hospitals. Data collection through Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, in the second half of 2014. Cutoff for positive assessment was ≥75 points. RESULTS: The scores for domains in the overall assessment were: 76 (team work atmosphere), 73 (safety atmosphere), 88 (job satisfaction), 59 (perceived stress), 66 (perception of unit management), 65 (perception of hospital management) and 80 (work conditions). When comparing averages between institutions, the private institution showed better working conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Results can be used to plan and organize actions, given the low scores in relation to the safety atmosphere, management and stress perception.
Authors: Taís Freire Galvão; Marcélia Célia Couteiro Lopes; Carmen Conceição Carrilho Oliva; Maria Elizete de Almeida Araújo; Marcus Tolentino Silva Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2018-08-09
Authors: Janina Ribelienė; Jūratė Macijauskienė; Rasa Tamelienė; Aušrelė Kudrevičienė; Irena Nedzelskienė; Aurelija Blaževičienė Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 4.614