| Literature DB >> 27991738 |
Paul Kruszka1, Antonio R Porras2, Andrew K Sobering3, Felicia A Ikolo3, Samantha La Qua3, Vorasuk Shotelersuk4, Brian H Y Chung5, Gary T K Mok5, Annette Uwineza6, Leon Mutesa6, Angélica Moresco7, María Gabriela Obregon7, Ogochukwu Jidechukwu Sokunbi8, Nnenna Kalu8, Daniel Akinsanya Joseph8, Desmond Ikebudu8, Christopher Emeka Ugwu8, Christy A N Okoromah8, Yonit A Addissie1, Katherine L Pardo1, J Joseph Brough1, Ni-Chung Lee9, Katta M Girisha10, Siddaramappa Jagdish Patil11, Ivy S L Ng12, Breana Cham Wen Min12, Saumya S Jamuar12, Shailja Tibrewal13, Batriti Wallang13, Suma Ganesh13, Nirmala D Sirisena14, Vajira H W Dissanayake14, C Sampath Paththinige14, L B Lahiru Prabodha14, Antonio Richieri-Costa15, Premala Muthukumarasamy16, Meow-Keong Thong16, Kelly L Jones17, Omar A Abdul-Rahman17, Ekanem Nsikak Ekure8, Adebowale A Adeyemo18, Marshall Summar19, Marius George Linguraru2, Maximilian Muenke1.
Abstract
Down syndrome is the most common cause of cognitive impairment and presents clinically with universally recognizable signs and symptoms. In this study, we focus on exam findings and digital facial analysis technology in individuals with Down syndrome in diverse populations. Photos and clinical information were collected on 65 individuals from 13 countries, 56.9% were male and the average age was 6.6 years (range 1 month to 26 years; SD = 6.6 years). Subjective findings showed that clinical features were different across ethnicities (Africans, Asians, and Latin Americans), including brachycephaly, ear anomalies, clinodactyly, sandal gap, and abundant neck skin, which were all significantly less frequent in Africans (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.05, and P < 0.05, respectively). Evaluation using a digital facial analysis technology of a larger diverse cohort of newborns to adults (n = 129 cases; n = 132 controls) was able to diagnose Down syndrome with a sensitivity of 0.961, specificity of 0.924, and accuracy of 0.943. Only the angles at medial canthus and ala of the nose were common significant findings amongst different ethnicities (Caucasians, Africans, and Asians) when compared to ethnically matched controls. The Asian group had the least number of significant digital facial biometrics at 4, compared to Caucasians at 8 and Africans at 7. In conclusion, this study displays the wide variety of findings across different geographic populations in Down syndrome and demonstrates the accuracy and promise of digital facial analysis technology in the diagnosis of Down syndrome internationally.Entities:
Keywords: diverse populations; down syndrome; facial analysis technology; trisomy 21
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27991738 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Med Genet A ISSN: 1552-4825 Impact factor: 2.802