| Literature DB >> 27991584 |
Eunhee Hwang1,2, Hee Min Hwang1,3, Yonghun Shin1,3, Yeoheung Yoon1,3, Hanleem Lee1,3, Junghee Yang2, Sora Bak1,2, Hyoyoung Lee1,2,3.
Abstract
A band gap tuning of environmental-friendly graphene quantum dot (GQD) becomes a keen interest for novel applications such as photoluminescence (PL) sensor. Here, for tuning the band gap of GQD, a hexafluorohydroxypropanyl benzene (HFHPB) group acted as a receptor of a chemical warfare agent was chemically attached on the GQD via the diazonium coupling reaction of HFHPB diazonium salt, providing new HFHPB-GQD material. With a help of the electron withdrawing HFHPB group, the energy band gap of the HFHPB-GQD was widened and its PL decay life time decreased. As designed, after addition of dimethyl methyl phosphonate (DMMP), the PL intensity of HFHPB-GQD sensor sharply increased up to approximately 200% through a hydrogen bond with DMMP. The fast response and short recovery time was proven by quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) analysis. This HFHPB-GQD sensor shows highly sensitive to DMMP in comparison with GQD sensor without HFHPB and graphene. In addition, the HFHPB-GQD sensor showed high selectivity only to the phosphonate functional group among many other analytes and also stable enough for real device applications. Thus, the tuning of the band gap of the photoluminescent GQDs may open up new promising strategies for the molecular detection of target substrates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27991584 PMCID: PMC5171703 DOI: 10.1038/srep39448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1An illustration of our sensory material referred to as HFHPB grafted GQD (HFHPB-GQD) and its interactions with the target material (DMMP).
Figure 2Characterization of HFHPB-GQDs.
(a) TEM image, inset; HRTEM image of HFHPB-GQDs (scale bar 1 nm). (b) AFM image of GQD (top), HFHPB-GQD (bottom). (c) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of GQDs (black) and HFHPB-GQDs (blue). (d) Raman spectra of GQDs (black) and HFHPB-GQDs (blue) on a SiO2/Si substrate with a 514 nm laser. The peak shift was calculated after Gaussian fitting.
Figure 3(a,b) X-ray photoelectron spectra of C 1 s and F 1 s for HFHPB-GQDs. (c,d) C1s and F1s for GQDs.
Figure 4Optical properties of GQDs and HFHPB-GQDs.
Photoluminescence excitation (PLE) (blue) and PL (black) spectra of (a) GQD, (b) HFHPB-GQD. Energy band diagram of (c) GQD, (d) HFHPB-GQD. (e) UV-vis spectra of GQD (black) and HFHPB-GQD (red). (f) Time resolved fluorescence decay curves of GQD (black) and HFHPB-GQD (blue) (λex = 340 nm, λem = 405 nm).
Figure 5(a) Photoluminescence spectra. Solid line - 2 mg/ml of GQDs (black) and HFHPB-GQDs (blue) and circle line – after adding of 500 μl of DMMP. (b) Sensing properties of HFHPB-GQDs for 100 μl increases in the amount of 0.5 M DMMP. (c) Time dependent photoluminescence spectra for HFHPB-GQDs by introducing various concentrations of DMMP. (d) Selectivity test: photoluminescence change of HFHPB-GQDs on injection of 500 μl of organic volatile solvents and DMMP. Excitation wavelength was at 330 nm.
Figure 6Nanogravimetry response of HFHPB-GQDs coated on QCM while releasing DMMP.
Inset: Magnified frequency change of HFHPB-GQDs at 4 ppm.