Literature DB >> 2799135

Analysis of case-control data with covariate measurement error: application to diet and colon cancer.

B G Armstrong1, A S Whittemore, G R Howe.   

Abstract

We propose a method for estimating odds ratios from case-control data in which covariates are subject to measurement error. The measurement error may contain both a random component and a systematic difference between cases and controls (recall bias). A multivariate normal discriminant analysis model is assumed. If the distribution of measurement error is known, then a simple correction to naive (biased) estimates of odds ratios from logistic regression of disease on fallible measurements of covariates removes bias. The same correction yields confidence intervals and significance tests. We apply the proposed methods to data from a case-control study of colon cancer and diet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2799135     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  Declaring independence: why we should be cautious.

Authors:  G D Smith; A Phillips
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Influence of handedness on calcaneal ultrasound: implications for assessment of osteoporosis and study design.

Authors:  G M Howard; T V Nguyen; N A Pocock; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and cancer.

Authors:  C Poole; D Trichopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Correcting for bias in relative risk estimates due to exposure measurement error: a case study of occupational exposure to antineoplastics in pharmacists.

Authors:  D Spiegelman; B Valanis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Regression calibration with heteroscedastic error variance.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman; Roger Logan; Douglas Grove
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Regression calibration is valid when properly applied.

Authors:  Xiaomei Liao; Donna Spiegelman; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  A test for gene-environment interaction in the presence of measurement error in the environmental variable.

Authors:  Hugues Aschard; Donna Spiegelman; Vincent Laville; Pete Kraft; Molin Wang
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  On the nondifferential misclassification of a binary confounder.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ogburn; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Power/sample size calculations for assessing correlates of risk in clinical efficacy trials.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Holly E Janes; Yunda Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Postmenopausal endogenous oestrogens and risk of endometrial cancer: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  A Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; A Akhmedkhanov; I Kato; K L Koenig; R E Shore; M Y Kim; M Levitz; K R Mittal; U Raju; S Banerjee; P Toniolo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.