Literature DB >> 27990274

Bacteriophage-based tools: recent advances and novel applications.

Lisa O'Sullivan1, Colin Buttimer1, Olivia McAuliffe2, Declan Bolton3, Aidan Coffey1.   

Abstract

Bacteriophages (phages) are viruses that infect bacterial hosts, and since their discovery over a century ago they have been primarily exploited to control bacterial populations and to serve as tools in molecular biology. In this commentary, we highlight recent diverse advances in the field of phage research, going beyond bacterial control using whole phage, to areas including biocontrol using phage-derived enzybiotics, diagnostics, drug discovery, novel drug delivery systems and bionanotechnology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial diagnostics; bacteriophage; biocontrol; bionanotechnology; biotechnology; phage; phage research; phage-based drug delivery

Year:  2016        PMID: 27990274      PMCID: PMC5133683          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.9705.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


Introduction

Bacteriophages (phages) are viruses that specifically infect bacteria. After their discovery in 1915 by Twort and 1917 by d’Herelle, these agents were initially used to treat bacterial infections, although widespread acceptance was limited owing to lack of understanding of phage biology and the development of antibiotic therapy in the 1940s [1]. With antibiotic resistance becoming problematic in the late twentieth century [2], there was a renewed interest in phage therapy research. Alongside this application, and indeed the fundamental role that phage research played in the understanding of molecular biology, phage research has led to the development of new technologies not only for therapy and biocontrol but also for bacterial detection, drug delivery, drug discovery, and nanotechnology.

Antibacterials and biocontrol

In addition to the well-documented cases of using wild-type phages as tools to eliminate pathogenic bacteria in infected humans [3] and in foods [4], the phage-encoded peptidoglycan hydrolases called endolysins have also been exploited in purified form to rapidly lyse bacterial cells [5]. The Gram-positive phage endolysins generally contain at least one enzymatic domain and a cell-wall-binding domain. Chimeric endolysins have recently been developed by fusing enzymatic domains to alternative cell-wall-binding determinants, thus altering endolysin behaviour and host range [6]. In the case of Gram-negative bacteria, the outer membrane is a barrier to exogenously added endolysin reaching the peptidoglycan target. Thus, the fusion of polycationic peptides to the Gram-negative endolysin facilitates outer membrane penetration allowing these new so-called Artilysin®s access to the Gram-negative peptidoglycan [7]. Recent research has also reported a phage endolysin (from a Streptococcus pyogenes phage) with the ability to cross mammalian cell membranes. Its endolysin, PlyC, was found to consist of two subunits, one of which is proposed to bind to the eukaryotic cell membrane, facilitating entry by endocytosis [8]. These are major breakthroughs in endolysin research, and, with further investigation and testing, similar enzymes may be discovered/engineered and used in the future to, respectively, treat infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria and intracellular bacterial infections. A recent advance in the area of antibiotic therapy has been the exploitation of phages to control antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Phages have been engineered to deliver CRISPR-Cas nucleases into antibiotic-resistant bacterial cells, and, in doing so, researchers have been able to harness the specific DNA-cleaving capacity of CRISPRs to knock out antibiotic resistance sequences, rendering resistant organisms antibiotic sensitive [9]. The use of phages as delivery vehicles ensures the specificity required in biocontrol. The wider exploitation of phages as delivery systems is discussed below.

Bacterial diagnostics

Phage virions and their encoded proteins can also be useful for the detection and specific identification of bacteria. The simplest of these is where a standard number of specific phages are incubated with a food material or some other test sample. If the bacterial target is present and viable, detectable phage numbers will increase through amplification on the pathogen. Modifications of this method can generate results more rapidly, and in the case of Yersinia pestis, Sergueev et al., for example, developed a quantitative real-time PCR to detect the increase in phage DNA instead of traditional plaque assays [10]. Reporter phages can also detect bacteria through infection without needing cell lysis and progeny phages. In this case, the phage genomes are modified to carry a bioluminescence or fluorescence gene that the phage alone cannot express. Upon injection of the phage DNA into its host, active bioluminescent or fluorescent proteins are synthesized, facilitating visual detection. Recently, Zhang et al. engineered an Escherichia coli 0157:H7 reporter phage containing Luciferase NanoLuc (Nluc) [11] and with it detected as few as five CFU of the E. coli by bioluminescence in a complex food matrix within nine hours [12]. Reporter phage assays have also been adapted to assess drug sensitivity in the target bacterium. A Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) fluorophage, ϕ 2GFP10, has been shown to detect TB in the complex matrix of a sputum sample, but also when rifampin or kanamycin are included in the assay, fluorescence was shown to be detectably diminished in sensitive cells in comparison with antibiotic-resistant variants [13]. Advantages of using whole phages for the detection of bacteria are that only viable bacterial cells are detected, bacterial host specificity is excellent, and phage cultivation is relatively inexpensive (however, lytic activity of a reporter phage should ideally be inactivated to ensure that the bacterial targets are not prematurely destroyed). Phage receptor-binding proteins (RBPs) have also been used successfully in bacterial detection and identification. The receptor-binding domain of the RBP in Campylobacter phage NCTC12673 was used to create a simple glass slide agglutination test for Campylobacter, and when fused to green fluorescent protein, the receptor-binding domain allowed the detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates through fluorescent microscopy [14]. Phages, because of their vast diversity, provide a plentiful source of host-specific proteins to create simple identification tests such as the agglutination assay mentioned above specifically for Campylobacter. In this regard, whole phage and phage RBPs have been successfully attached to biosensing surfaces for bacterial detection, allowing for high specificity. Of the two, the RBPs are simpler and easier to attach. In addition, they can be recombinantly produced and are reported to have better stability than antibodies [15]. Optimization of phage densities and attachment to biosensing surfaces is still ongoing [16]. In the context of detection, the phage endolysins (discussed earlier) can also have a role when used instead of traditional DNA extraction reagents. It was shown that the peptidoglycan of Staphylococcus aureus is degraded more rapidly by staphylococcal endolysin ClyH than by lysostaphin, thus shortening the DNA sample preparation for real-time PCR when the endolysin was employed [17]. Phage display, which involves genetically modifying a phage virion so that a foreign peptide is displayed on the surface (discussed further below), can also be exploited in bacterial detection systems. Lee et al. created a phage that displayed two different peptides, one with an affinity to gold nanoparticles and another with specificity to a target protein. By measuring the ultraviolet absorbance of this phage, they could detect as little as 25 femtomoles of their target antigen [18]. These modified phages have also been incorporated into systems capable of in-the-field real-time detection using engineered phage displaying peptides capable of binding to a magnetoelastic resonator as well as the target analytes, such as bacteria and endospores [19– 21].

Drug discovery and phage-based drug delivery systems

Since phage display was first described in 1985 by Smith [22], it has seen numerous applications in the identification of receptor and ligand interactions of infectious diseases and cancers [23, 24], with these developments allowing for drug discovery [25] and vaccine design [26]. Phage display is now allowing the modification of phages into vehicles (nanocarriers) for chemotherapeutic drug delivery by the attachment of a drug to the phage surface and presentation of peptides on the surface of that phage with specificity to a ligand of interest. Such constructs have even been designed to target non-host bacteria, including mammalian cells [27]. These phages, displaying therapeutic peptides, can even be designed to pass the blood–brain barrier [28], and such constructs could thus have potential in the treatment of diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Phages with an affinity to specific cell receptors, such as those overexpressed in cancer cells, may be exploited beyond drug delivery to allow for simultaneous target detection by displaying diagnostic reporter molecules or by detection of bound phage DNA by real-time PCR [29, 30]. Empty phage capsids are also being employed as carriers, with studies demonstrating the potential to encapsulate RNA molecules, peptides, and therapeutic compounds [31– 33]. Phage capsids or virus-like particles (VLPs) have also been modified to present ligands on their surface to allow the delivery of encapsulated RNA-guided endonucleases to specific cell types for in situ genome editing [34]. When phages are used as nanocarriers to deliver chemotherapeutic drugs for cancer treatment, drug half-life is extended and toxicity is focused only on the site of interest, lessening damage to body tissues [35]. Capsid-based carriers have also been developed by fusing drug-loaded liposomes to capsid proteins displaying peptides with binding specificity to a particular target [36].

Biotechnology

Genetically modified filamentous phages have been used in material synthesis to construct nanowires and films for semi-conductor applications [37], piezoelectric energy generation [38], and photo-response properties [39]. These materials have been used to create devices such as ion batteries and catalysts [40, 41], with phage M13-based nanowires also being constructed into scaffolding to allow guided cell growth for human tissue formation [42]. Phage-derived enzymes, which have formed part of a core toolbox in traditional molecular biology, are now being applied to novel concepts. Phage RNA polymerase and ribonuclease H are being used to create in vitro genetic circuits that have potential future applications in nanodevices and the regulation of processes within artificial cells [43]. Recombinases are seeing use in these constructions by extending memory capabilities to these circuits [44]. These enzymes are also being used to create novel tools for bacterial genome editing and accelerated evolution [45, 46]. It is noteworthy that many past phage-dedicated reviews have not satisfactorily encompassed the recent advances of phage applications in nanomedicine; a recent excellent article comments in a comprehensive way on the many roles and opportunities of phages as nano-therapeutics, bioimaging probes, biomimetic biomaterials, tissue regenerative scaffolds, matrices for directing stem cell fate, and probes for detecting disease biomarkers, among numerous others [47].

Summary

This commentary provides a snapshot of the increasing diversity of phage research in recent years and shows that it is advancing rapidly and that new applications are being reported frequently. Since the discovery of phages a century ago, their research focus has diversified from applying these agents to simply treat bacterial infections to a broad range of useful functions including biocontrol, diagnostics, drug discovery, and drug delivery as well as several applications in nanomedicine.
  42 in total

1.  Enhanced binding and killing of target tumor cells by drug-loaded liposomes modified with tumor-specific phage fusion coat protein.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Gerard G M D'Souza; Deepa Bedi; Olusegun A Fagbohun; L Prasanna Potturi; Brigitte Papahadjopoulos-Sternberg; Valery A Petrenko; Vladimir P Torchilin
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Rapid killing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with a bacteriophage cell wall hydrolase.

Authors:  J M Loeffler; D Nelson; V A Fischetti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Dual-surface modified virus capsids for targeted delivery of photodynamic agents to cancer cells.

Authors:  Nicholas Stephanopoulos; Gary J Tong; Sonny C Hsiao; Matthew B Francis
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Synthetic in vitro transcriptional oscillators.

Authors:  Jongmin Kim; Erik Winfree
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.429

5.  Engineered endolysin-based "Artilysins" to combat multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.

Authors:  Yves Briers; Maarten Walmagh; Victor Van Puyenbroeck; Anneleen Cornelissen; William Cenens; Abram Aertsen; Hugo Oliveira; Joana Azeredo; Gunther Verween; Jean-Paul Pirnay; Stefan Miller; Guido Volckaert; Rob Lavigne
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Virus-based photo-responsive nanowires formed by linking site-directed mutagenesis and chemical reaction.

Authors:  Murali Murugesan; Gopal Abbineni; Susan L Nimmo; Binrui Cao; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Exploiting CRISPR-Cas nucleases to produce sequence-specific antimicrobials.

Authors:  David Bikard; Chad W Euler; Wenyan Jiang; Philip M Nussenzweig; Gregory W Goldberg; Xavier Duportet; Vincent A Fischetti; Luciano A Marraffini
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Bacteriophage receptor binding protein based assays for the simultaneous detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  Muhammad A Javed; Somayyeh Poshtiban; Denis Arutyunov; Stephane Evoy; Christine M Szymanski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  A historical overview of bacteriophage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Xavier Wittebole; Sophie De Roock; Steven M Opal
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.882

10.  The Use of a Novel NanoLuc -Based Reporter Phage for the Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Claudia P Coronel-Aguilera; Patricia L Romero; Lynda Perry; Udit Minocha; Carla Rosenfield; Andrew G Gehring; George C Paoli; Arun K Bhunia; Bruce Applegate
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multiple mechanisms drive phage infection efficiency in nearly identical hosts.

Authors:  Cristina Howard-Varona; Katherine R Hargreaves; Natalie E Solonenko; Lye Meng Markillie; Richard Allen White; Heather M Brewer; Charles Ansong; Galya Orr; Joshua N Adkins; Matthew B Sullivan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Refining the Galleria mellonella Model by Using Stress Marker Genes to Assess Clostridioides difficile Infection and Recuperation during Phage Therapy.

Authors:  Janet Y Nale; Mahananda Chutia; Jeffrey K J Cheng; Martha R J Clokie
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-08-27

3.  vB_BcM_Sam46 and vB_BcM_Sam112, members of a new bacteriophage genus with unusual small terminase structure.

Authors:  Olesya A Kazantseva; Emma G Piligrimova; Andrey M Shadrin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Real-Time qPCR as a Method for Detection of Antibody-Neutralized Phage Particles.

Authors:  Anna Kłopot; Adriana Zakrzewska; Dorota Lecion; Joanna M Majewska; Marek A Harhala; Karolina Lahutta; Zuzanna Kaźmierczak; Łukasz Łaczmański; Marlena Kłak; Krystyna Dąbrowska
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  'Drc', a structurally novel ssDNA-binding transcription regulator of N4-related bacterial viruses.

Authors:  Maarten Boon; Elke De Zitter; Jeroen De Smet; Jeroen Wagemans; Marleen Voet; Friederike L Pennemann; Thomas Schalck; Konstantin Kuznedelov; Konstantin Severinov; Luc Van Meervelt; Marc De Maeyer; Rob Lavigne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Ion-dependent DNA configuration in bacteriophage capsids.

Authors:  Pei Liu; Javier Arsuaga; M Carme Calderer; Dmitry Golovaty; Mariel Vazquez; Shawn Walker
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.699

7.  Genomic characterization of three novel Basilisk-like phages infecting Bacillus anthracis.

Authors:  J Farlow; D Bolkvadze; L Leshkasheli; I Kusradze; A Kotorashvili; N Kotaria; N Balarjishvili; L Kvachadze; M Nikolich; M Kutateladze
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 8.  Considerations for the Use of Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Gina A Suh; Thomas P Lodise; Pranita D Tamma; Jane M Knisely; Jose Alexander; Saima Aslam; Karen D Barton; Erica Bizzell; Katherine M C Totten; Joseph L Campbell; Benjamin K Chan; Scott A Cunningham; Katherine E Goodman; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Anthony D Harris; Shayla Hesse; Anthony Maresso; Veronique Nussenblatt; David Pride; Michael J Rybak; Zoe Sund; David van Duin; Daria Van Tyne; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.