Chany Lee1, Young-Jin Jung2, Sang Jun Lee1, Chang-Hwan Im3. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiological Science, Dongseo University, Busan, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ich@hanyang.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since there is no way to measure electric current generated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) inside the human head through in vivo experiments, numerical analysis based on the finite element method has been widely used to estimate the electric field inside the head. In 2013, we released a MATLAB toolbox named COMETS, which has been used by a number of groups and has helped researchers to gain insight into the electric field distribution during stimulation. The aim of this study was to develop an advanced MATLAB toolbox, named COMETS2, for the numerical analysis of the electric field generated by tDCS. NEW METHOD: COMETS2 can generate any sizes of rectangular pad electrodes on any positions on the scalp surface. To reduce the large computational burden when repeatedly testing multiple electrode locations and sizes, a new technique to decompose the global stiffness matrix was proposed. RESULTS: As examples of potential applications, we observed the effects of sizes and displacements of electrodes on the results of electric field analysis. The proposed mesh decomposition method significantly enhanced the overall computational efficiency. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: We implemented an automatic electrode modeler for the first time, and proposed a new technique to enhance the computational efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, an efficient toolbox for tDCS analysis is introduced (freely available at http://www.cometstool.com). It is expected that COMETS2 will be a useful toolbox for researchers who want to benefit from the numerical analysis of electric fields generated by tDCS.
BACKGROUND: Since there is no way to measure electric current generated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) inside the human head through in vivo experiments, numerical analysis based on the finite element method has been widely used to estimate the electric field inside the head. In 2013, we released a MATLAB toolbox named COMETS, which has been used by a number of groups and has helped researchers to gain insight into the electric field distribution during stimulation. The aim of this study was to develop an advanced MATLAB toolbox, named COMETS2, for the numerical analysis of the electric field generated by tDCS. NEW METHOD: COMETS2 can generate any sizes of rectangular pad electrodes on any positions on the scalp surface. To reduce the large computational burden when repeatedly testing multiple electrode locations and sizes, a new technique to decompose the global stiffness matrix was proposed. RESULTS: As examples of potential applications, we observed the effects of sizes and displacements of electrodes on the results of electric field analysis. The proposed mesh decomposition method significantly enhanced the overall computational efficiency. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: We implemented an automatic electrode modeler for the first time, and proposed a new technique to enhance the computational efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, an efficient toolbox for tDCS analysis is introduced (freely available at http://www.cometstool.com). It is expected that COMETS2 will be a useful toolbox for researchers who want to benefit from the numerical analysis of electric fields generated by tDCS.
Authors: A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Theodore P Zanto; Kevin T Jones; Avery E Ostrand; Wan-Yu Hsu; Richard Campusano; Adam Gazzaley Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 9.184
Authors: Aung Thu Htet; Guilherme B Saturnino; Edward H Burnham; Gregory M Noetscher; Aapo Nummenmaa; Sergey N Makarov Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Sam M Koshy; Alex I Wiesman; Rachel K Spooner; Christine Embury; Michael T Rezich; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Karolina M Lukasik; Minna Lehtonen; Juha Salmi; Marcus Meinzer; Juho Joutsa; Matti Laine Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Leigh E Charvet; Vincent P Clark; Leonardo G Cohen; Zhi-De Deng; Jacek Dmochowski; Dylan J Edwards; Flavio Frohlich; Emily S Kappenman; Kelvin O Lim; Colleen Loo; Antonio Mantovani; David P McMullen; Lucas C Parra; Michele Pearson; Jessica D Richardson; Judith M Rumsey; Pejman Sehatpour; David Sommers; Gozde Unal; Eric M Wassermann; Adam J Woods; Sarah H Lisanby Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 8.955