BACKGROUND: Previous work suggests that impairments of cerebrovascular flow or reactivity might be early markers of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Hereditary cerebral haemorrhage with amyloidosis-Dutch type (HCHWA-D) is a genetic form of CAA that can be diagnosed before the onset of clinical symptoms by DNA testing. We aimed to investigate whether haemodynamic measures are decreased in presymptomatic and symptomatic HCHWA-D mutation carriers compared with healthy controls. METHODS: In this case-control study, we included presymptomatic and symptomatic HCHWA-D mutation carriers diagnosed through genetic testing and recruited through the HCHWA-D patient association (Katwijk, Netherlands) and the outpatient clinic of the Department of Neurology of the Leiden University Medical Center (Leiden, Netherlands), and healthy controls. We measured regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling. Quantitative flow was measured by phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography of the cerebropetal vessels. Vascular reactivity was established by measuring changes in blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal after visual stimulation. Data from presymptomatic and symptomatic individuals were compared with healthy controls using mixed-model regression analysis. FINDINGS: Between May 15, 2012, and December 22, 2015, we investigated cross-sectional imaging data from 27 HCHWA-D mutation carriers (12 presymptomatic and 15 symptomatic) and 33 healthy controls. Compared with controls, symptomatic HCHWA-D carriers had significantly decreased cortical grey matter rCBF in the occipital lobe (mean difference -11·1 mL/100 g per min, 95% CI -2·8 to -19·3; uncorrected p=0·010) and decreased flux in the basilar artery (mean difference -0·9 mL/s, 95% CI -1·5 to -0·2; uncorrected p=0·019). However, we noted no changes in rCBF and flux in presymptomatic carriers compared with controls. Vascular reactivity was significantly decreased in the occipital lobe in both presymptomatic (mean BOLD change 1·1% [SD 0·5], mean difference -0·4% change, 95% CI -0·7 to -0·2; p=0·001; mean time to baseline 10·1 s [SD 7·6], mean difference 4·6 s, 95% CI 0·4 to 8·8; p=0·032) and symptomatic carriers (mean BOLD change 0·4% [SD 0·1], mean difference -0·9%, 95% CI -1·1 to -0·6; p<0·0001; mean time to baseline 20·3 s [SD 8·4], mean difference 13·1 s, 95% CI 9·4 to 16·9; p<0·0001) compared with controls; however, the difference in mean time to peak was only significant for symptomatic carriers (mean difference 12·2 s, 95% CI 8·6 to 15·9; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that determination of vascular reactivity might be a useful biomarker for early detection of vascular amyloid pathology in sporadic CAA, and a biomarker of efficacy in future intervention trials. Our data indicate that vascular reactivity measurements might be useful for differential diagnosis in dementia to determine the vascular component. FUNDING: USA National Institutes of Health.
BACKGROUND: Previous work suggests that impairments of cerebrovascular flow or reactivity might be early markers of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Hereditary cerebral haemorrhage with amyloidosis-Dutch type (HCHWA-D) is a genetic form of CAA that can be diagnosed before the onset of clinical symptoms by DNA testing. We aimed to investigate whether haemodynamic measures are decreased in presymptomatic and symptomatic HCHWA-D mutation carriers compared with healthy controls. METHODS: In this case-control study, we included presymptomatic and symptomatic HCHWA-D mutation carriers diagnosed through genetic testing and recruited through the HCHWA-D patient association (Katwijk, Netherlands) and the outpatient clinic of the Department of Neurology of the Leiden University Medical Center (Leiden, Netherlands), and healthy controls. We measured regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling. Quantitative flow was measured by phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography of the cerebropetal vessels. Vascular reactivity was established by measuring changes in blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal after visual stimulation. Data from presymptomatic and symptomatic individuals were compared with healthy controls using mixed-model regression analysis. FINDINGS: Between May 15, 2012, and December 22, 2015, we investigated cross-sectional imaging data from 27 HCHWA-D mutation carriers (12 presymptomatic and 15 symptomatic) and 33 healthy controls. Compared with controls, symptomatic HCHWA-D carriers had significantly decreased cortical grey matter rCBF in the occipital lobe (mean difference -11·1 mL/100 g per min, 95% CI -2·8 to -19·3; uncorrected p=0·010) and decreased flux in the basilar artery (mean difference -0·9 mL/s, 95% CI -1·5 to -0·2; uncorrected p=0·019). However, we noted no changes in rCBF and flux in presymptomatic carriers compared with controls. Vascular reactivity was significantly decreased in the occipital lobe in both presymptomatic (mean BOLD change 1·1% [SD 0·5], mean difference -0·4% change, 95% CI -0·7 to -0·2; p=0·001; mean time to baseline 10·1 s [SD 7·6], mean difference 4·6 s, 95% CI 0·4 to 8·8; p=0·032) and symptomatic carriers (mean BOLD change 0·4% [SD 0·1], mean difference -0·9%, 95% CI -1·1 to -0·6; p<0·0001; mean time to baseline 20·3 s [SD 8·4], mean difference 13·1 s, 95% CI 9·4 to 16·9; p<0·0001) compared with controls; however, the difference in mean time to peak was only significant for symptomatic carriers (mean difference 12·2 s, 95% CI 8·6 to 15·9; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that determination of vascular reactivity might be a useful biomarker for early detection of vascular amyloid pathology in sporadic CAA, and a biomarker of efficacy in future intervention trials. Our data indicate that vascular reactivity measurements might be useful for differential diagnosis in dementia to determine the vascular component. FUNDING: USA National Institutes of Health.
Authors: Andrew Dumas; Gregory A Dierksen; M Edip Gurol; Amy Halpin; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Kristin Schwab; Jonathan Rosand; Anand Viswanathan; David H Salat; Jonathan R Polimeni; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Byung Hee Han; Meng-Liang Zhou; Fadi Abousaleh; Robert P Brendza; Hans H Dietrich; Jessica Koenigsknecht-Talboo; John R Cirrito; Eric Milner; David M Holtzman; Gregory J Zipfel Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Stefano Peca; Cheryl R McCreary; Emily Donaldson; Gopukumar Kumarpillai; Nandavar Shobha; Karla Sanchez; Anna Charlton; Craig D Steinback; Andrew E Beaudin; Daniela Flück; Neelan Pillay; Gordon H Fick; Marc J Poulin; Richard Frayne; Bradley G Goodyear; Eric E Smith Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Aaron R Switzer; Cheryl McCreary; Saima Batool; Randall B Stafford; Richard Frayne; Bradley G Goodyear; Eric E Smith Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Aaron P Schultz; Reina W Kloet; Hamid R Sohrabi; Louise van der Weerd; Sanneke van Rooden; Marieke J H Wermer; Laure Grand Moursel; Maqsood Yaqub; Bart N M van Berckel; Pratishtha Chatterjee; Samantha L Gardener; Kevin Taddei; Anne M Fagan; Tammie L Benzinger; John C Morris; Reisa Sperling; Keith Johnson; Randall J Bateman; M Edip Gurol; Mark A van Buchem; Ralph Martins; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jungyun Hwang; Kiyoung Kim; R Matthew Brothers; Darla M Castelli; F Gonzalez-Lima Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Rocco J Cannistraro; Mohammed Badi; Benjamin H Eidelman; Dennis W Dickson; Erik H Middlebrooks; James F Meschia Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Susanne J van Veluw; Steven S Hou; Maria Calvo-Rodriguez; Michal Arbel-Ornath; Austin C Snyder; Matthew P Frosch; Steven M Greenberg; Brian J Bacskai Journal: Neuron Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Sanneke van Rooden; Andreas Charidimou; Anna Maria van Opstal; Marieke Wermer; M Edip Gurol; Gisela Terwindt; Jeroen van der Grond; Steven M Greenberg; Mark van Buchem; Anand Viswanathan Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Emma A Koemans; Ellis S van Etten; Anna M van Opstal; Gerda Labadie; Gisela M Terwindt; Marieke J H Wermer; Andrew G Webb; Edip M Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Mark A van Buchem; Jeroen van der Grond; Sanneke van Rooden Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Steven M Greenberg; Brian J Bacskai; Mar Hernandez-Guillamon; Jeremy Pruzin; Reisa Sperling; Susanne J van Veluw Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 42.937