Literature DB >> 27989355

Knee, Shoulder, and Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training: Validation of a Virtual Arthroscopy Simulator.

Josef N Tofte1, Brian O Westerlind2, Kevin D Martin3, Brian L Guetschow4, Bastián Uribe-Echevarria2, Chamnanni Rungprai2, Phinit Phisitkul2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate the knee, shoulder, and virtual Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Training (FAST) modules on a virtual arthroscopy simulator via correlations with arthroscopy case experience and postgraduate year.
METHODS: Orthopaedic residents and faculty from one institution performed a standardized sequence of knee, shoulder, and FAST modules to evaluate baseline arthroscopy skills. Total operation time, camera path length, and composite total score (metric derived from multiple simulator measurements) were compared with case experience and postgraduate level. Values reported are Pearson r; alpha = 0.05.
RESULTS: 35 orthopaedic residents (6 per postgraduate year), 2 fellows, and 3 faculty members (2 sports, 1 foot and ankle), including 30 male and 5 female residents, were voluntarily enrolled March to June 2015. Knee: training year correlated significantly with year-averaged knee composite score, r = 0.92, P = .004, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84, 0.96; operation time, r = -0.92, P = .004, 95% CI = -0.96, -0.84; and camera path length, r = -0.97, P = .0004, 95% CI = -0.98, -0.93. Knee arthroscopy case experience correlated significantly with composite score, r = 0.58, P = .0008, 95% CI = 0.27, 0.77; operation time, r = -0.54, P = .002, 95% CI = -0.75, -0.22; and camera path length, r = -0.62, P = .0003, 95% CI = -0.8, -0.33. Shoulder: training year correlated strongly with average shoulder composite score, r = 0.90, P = .006, 95% CI = 0.81, 0.95; operation time, r = -0.94, P = .001, 95% CI = -0.97, -0.89; and camera path length, r = -0.89, P = .007, 95% CI = -0.95, -0.80. Shoulder arthroscopy case experience correlated significantly with average composite score, r = 0.52, P = .003, 95% CI = 0.2, 0.74; strongly with operation time, r = -0.62, P = .0002, 95% CI = -0.8, -0.33; and camera path length, r = -0.37, P = .044, 95% CI = -0.64, -0.01, by training year. FAST: training year correlated significantly with 3 combined FAST activity average composite scores, r = 0.81, P = .0279, 95% CI = 0.65, 0.90; operation times, r = -0.86, P = .012, 95% CI = -0.93, -0.74; and camera path lengths, r = -0.85, P = .015, 95% CI = -0.92, -0.72. Total arthroscopy cases performed did not correlate significantly with overall FAST performance.
CONCLUSIONS: We found significant correlations between both training year and knee and shoulder arthroscopy experience when compared with performance as measured by composite score, camera path length, and operation time during a simulated diagnostic knee and shoulder arthroscopy, respectively. Three FAST activities demonstrated significant correlations with training year but not arthroscopy case experience as measured by composite score, camera path length, and operation time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We attempt to validate an arthroscopy simulator that could be used to supplement arthroscopy skills training for orthopaedic residents.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27989355     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Virtual arthroscopy : Gaming or training concept of the future].

Authors:  Stephan Reppenhagen; Manuel Weißenberger; Thomas Barthel; Maximilian Rudert; Hermann Anetzberger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Efficacy and Validation of a Simulation-Based Compartment Syndrome Instructional Course.

Authors:  Saran Tantavisut; Josef N Tofte; Brian O Westerlind; Matthew D Karam; Phinit Phisitkul; John L Marsh
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2018

3.  Survey of trainee attitudes to skill development and simulation training in trauma and orthopaedics.

Authors:  Shivan S Jassim; Sundeep K Varma; Manoj Ramachandran; Kashif S N Akhtar
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-08-11

4.  Is the Virtual Reality Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training Program a Valid Platform for Resident Arthroscopy Training?

Authors:  Kalpesh R Vaghela; Amaury Trockels; Joshua Lee; Kash Akhtar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Construct Validity of a Virtual Reality Simulator for Surgical Training in Knee Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Miguel J Palet; Marcela Antúnez-Riveros; Maximiliano Barahona
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-25

6.  Practicing Procedural Skills Is More Effective Than Basic Psychomotor Training in Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Study.

Authors:  Mads Emil Jacobsen; Amandus Gustafsson; Per Gorm Jørgensen; Yoon Soo Park; Lars Konge
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23

7.  Module-Based Arthroscopic Knee Simulator Training Improves Technical Skills in Naive Learners: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Alisha Beaudoin; Samuel Larrivée; Sheila McRae; Jeff Leiter; Gregory Stranges
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-14

8.  Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hannah K James; Anna W Chapman; Giles T R Pattison; Joanne D Fisher; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2020-06

9.  Dawn of the Visible Monkey: Segmentation of the Rhesus Monkey for 2D and 3D Applications.

Authors:  Chung Yoh Kim; Ae Kyoung Lee; Hyung Do Choi; Jin Seo Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  A virtual reality simulator for training the surgical reduction of patient-specific supracondylar humerus fractures.

Authors:  José Negrillo-Cárdenas; Juan-Roberto Jiménez-Pérez; Joaquim Madeira; Francisco R Feito
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.