Literature DB >> 2798929

Contrast effects in flavour preference learning.

E Capaldi, J D Sheffer, R J Pulley.   

Abstract

In four experiments the role of contrast effects in producing learned flavour preferences was examined. The experiments showed that contrast effects are pervasive in flavour preference learning, producing results that are often paradoxical from a traditional reinforcement point of view. In Experiment 1, rats preferred a reinforced flavour over a nonreinforced flavour more if the reinforcer was 1% sucrose than if the reinforcer was 8% sucrose. Because the cue flavour was dissolved in 8% sucrose, this represents an anticipatory positive contrast effect. In Experiment 2, the relationship between cue and consequence was shown to be important in flavour preference learning, as expected if contrast effects are involved. In Experiment 3, rats preferred a flavour that was reinforced 4 times, and they preferred this flavour more than one reinforced 8 times, presumably because the greater the expectancy of the consequence, the greater the anticipatory negative contrast. In Experiment 4, rats consumed less of 0.15% saccharin if they received 32% sucrose randomly 90 min either before or after the 0.15% saccharin than if they received only 0.15% saccharin, a simultaneous negative contrast effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2798929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  5 in total

1.  Session duration and the VI response function: Within-session prospective and retrospective effects.

Authors:  J D Dougan; J A Kuh; K L Vink
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  The state of the reward comparison hypothesis: theoretical comment on Huang and Hsiao (2008).

Authors:  Patricia Sue Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  An evaluation of simultaneous and sequential presentation of preferred and nonpreferred food to treat food selectivity.

Authors:  Cathleen C Piazza; Meeta R Patel; Christine M Santana; Han Leong Goh; Michael D Delia; Blake M Lancaster
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

4.  An easy-to-hard effect after nonreinforced preexposure in a sweetness discrimination.

Authors:  María Del Carmen Sanjuán; James Byron Nelson; Gumersinda Alonso
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.926

5.  Contexts control negative contrast and restrict the expression of flavor preference conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph M Austen; David J Sanderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.478

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.