Literature DB >> 2798926

Inhibitory discriminative control is specific to both the response and the reinforcer.

C Bonardi.   

Abstract

In two experiments an S delta was established which signalled the absence of an instrumental contingency between a particular response, R1, and a particular reinforcer, Rf1. The S delta suppressed operant responding, and the specificity of this suppression to the elements of the response-reinforcer association, R1 and Rf1, was explored. Experiment 1 showed that the S delta suppressed performance of R1 more effectively than it suppressed performance of a second response, R2. Experiment 2 showed that the S delta suppressed performance of a response rewarded with Rf1 more effectively than it suppressed performance of a response that had been rewarded with a second reinforcer, Rf2. These results suggest that an S delta's suppressive effects are specific to the particular response and reinforcer, which were uncorrelated in its presence during training. The implications of these results for theories of inhibitory discriminative control and for theories of occasion setting are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2798926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  8 in total

1.  Negative priming and occasion setting in an appetitive Pavlovian procedure.

Authors:  Esther Mondragón; Charlotte Bonardi; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Outcome-specific conditioned inhibition in Pavlovian backward conditioning.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater; Vincent M LoLordo; Wendy Sosa
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Mechanisms of renewal after the extinction of instrumental behavior.

Authors:  Travis P Todd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-04-29

4.  Outcome specificity in deepened extinction may limit treatment feasibility: co-presentation of a food cue interferes with extinction of cue-elicited cocaine seeking.

Authors:  Brendan J Tunstall; Andrey Verendeev; David N Kearns
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 5.  Occasion setting, inhibition, and the contextual control of extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental (operant) learning.

Authors:  Sydney Trask; Eric A Thrailkill; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Extinction of goal tracking also eliminates the conditioned reinforcing effects of an appetitive conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  David N Kearns; Brendan J Tunstall; Katherine R Marks; Stanley J Weiss
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

7.  Can the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine function concurrently as modulatory opponents in operant and pavlovian occasion setting paradigms in rats?

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi; Noelle L Michaud
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Mediated configural learning in rats.

Authors:  Tzu-Ching E Lin; Natasha M Dumigan; Sergio A Recio; R C Honey
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.143

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.