Literature DB >> 27988225

The Epigenetic Paradox of Pluripotent ES Cells.

Nicola Festuccia1, Inma Gonzalez1, Pablo Navarro2.   

Abstract

The propagation and maintenance of gene expression programs are at the foundation of the preservation of cell identity. A large and complex set of epigenetic mechanisms enables the long-term stability and inheritance of transcription states. A key property of authentic epigenetic regulation is being independent from the instructive signals used for its establishment. This makes epigenetic regulation, particularly epigenetic silencing, extremely robust and powerful to lock regulatory states and stabilise cell identity. In line with this, the establishment of epigenetic silencing during development restricts cell potency and maintains the cell fate choices made by transcription factors (TFs). However, how more immature cells that have not yet established their definitive fate maintain their transitory identity without compromising their responsiveness to signalling cues remains unclear. A paradigmatic example is provided by pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells derived from a transient population of cells of the blastocyst. Here, we argue that ES cells represent an interesting "epigenetic paradox": even though they are captured in a self-renewing state characterised by extremely efficient maintenance of their identity, which is a typical manifestation of robust epigenetic regulation, they seem not to heavily rely on classical epigenetic mechanisms. Indeed, self-renewal strictly depends on the TFs that previously instructed their undifferentiated identity and relies on a particular signalling-dependent chromatin state where repressive chromatin marks play minor roles. Although this "epigenetic paradox" may underlie their exquisite responsiveness to developmental cues, it suggests that alternative mechanisms to faithfully propagate gene regulatory states might be prevalent in ES cells.
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ES cell self-renewal; chromatin; epigenetics; pluripotent embryonic stem cells; transcription factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27988225     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  11 in total

1.  Shaping epigenetic memory via genomic bookmarking.

Authors:  Davide Michieletto; Michael Chiang; Davide Colì; Argyris Papantonis; Enzo Orlandini; Peter R Cook; Davide Marenduzzo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  All models are wrong, but some are useful: Establishing standards for stem cell-based embryo models.

Authors:  Eszter Posfai; Fredrik Lanner; Carla Mulas; Harry G Leitch
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 7.765

3.  Esrrb extinction triggers dismantling of naïve pluripotency and marks commitment to differentiation.

Authors:  Nicola Festuccia; Florian Halbritter; Andrea Corsinotti; Alessia Gagliardi; Douglas Colby; Simon R Tomlinson; Ian Chambers
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  CTCF confers local nucleosome resiliency after DNA replication and during mitosis.

Authors:  Nick Owens; Thaleia Papadopoulou; Nicola Festuccia; Alexandra Tachtsidi; Inma Gonzalez; Agnes Dubois; Sandrine Vandormael-Pournin; Elphège P Nora; Benoit G Bruneau; Michel Cohen-Tannoudji; Pablo Navarro
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Activation of transcription factor circuity in 2i-induced ground state pluripotency is independent of repressive global epigenetic landscapes.

Authors:  Ruchi Shukla; Heidi K Mjoseng; John P Thomson; Simon Kling; Duncan Sproul; Donncha S Dunican; Bernard Ramsahoye; Tuempong Wongtawan; Fridolin Treindl; Markus F Templin; Ian R Adams; Sari Pennings; Richard R Meehan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The related coactivator complexes SAGA and ATAC control embryonic stem cell self-renewal through acetyltransferase-independent mechanisms.

Authors:  Veronique Fischer; Damien Plassard; Tao Ye; Bernardo Reina-San-Martin; Matthieu Stierle; Laszlo Tora; Didier Devys
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Epigenetic inheritance is gated by naïve pluripotency and Dppa2.

Authors:  Valentina Carlini; Cristina Policarpi; Jamie A Hackett
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Heterozygous loss of Zbtb38 leads to early embryonic lethality via the suppression of Nanog and Sox2 expression.

Authors:  Miki Nishio; Takuya Matsuura; Shunya Hibi; Shiomi Ohta; Chio Oka; Noriaki Sasai; Yasumasa Ishida; Eishou Matsuda
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 8.755

9.  Expression profiling of cell-intrinsic regulators in the process of differentiation of human iPSCs into retinal lineages.

Authors:  Jen-Hua Chuang; Aliaksandr A Yarmishyn; De-Kuang Hwang; Chih-Chien Hsu; Mong-Lien Wang; Yi-Ping Yang; Ke-Hung Chien; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Chi-Hsien Peng; Shih-Jen Chen
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 6.832

10.  Histone H2Bub1 deubiquitylation is essential for mouse development, but does not regulate global RNA polymerase II transcription.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Farrah El-Saafin; Tao Ye; Matthieu Stierle; Luc Negroni; Matej Durik; Veronique Fischer; Didier Devys; Stéphane D Vincent; László Tora
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 15.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.