Fernando A Wilson1, Yang Wang2. 1. Department of Health Services Research and Administration, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska. Electronic address: fernando.wilson@unmc.edu. 2. Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study uses a recent source of nationally representative data from in-person surveys to examine national estimates of e-cigarette use among adults and their relationship with demographic, socioeconomic, and health behavior measures. METHODS: Data were provided by the National Health Interview Survey, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A total of 34,356 respondents aged ≥18 years were examined for 2014, the most recent and only year in which the National Health Interview Survey included questions on e-cigarette use. E-cigarette information included ever and current use. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, marital status, poverty, and smoking status. Analyses were conducted in 2016. RESULTS: Compared with those who had never tried e-cigarettes, e-cigarette users were more likely to be younger, male, non-Hispanic white, non-married, poorer, and current smokers. Multivariable logistic regression suggested that respondents with high school or some college education had significantly higher adjusted odds of ever using e-cigarettes relative to those with less than high school education. However, the adjusted odds were not significantly different for college or graduate school education. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, unlike tobacco use, ever using e-cigarettes is positively related to income. Interestingly, e-cigarette use exhibits a non-linear relationship with education. Reasons for the relationship of e-cigarettes with education are unclear and warrant further research.
INTRODUCTION: This study uses a recent source of nationally representative data from in-person surveys to examine national estimates of e-cigarette use among adults and their relationship with demographic, socioeconomic, and health behavior measures. METHODS: Data were provided by the National Health Interview Survey, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A total of 34,356 respondents aged ≥18 years were examined for 2014, the most recent and only year in which the National Health Interview Survey included questions on e-cigarette use. E-cigarette information included ever and current use. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, marital status, poverty, and smoking status. Analyses were conducted in 2016. RESULTS: Compared with those who had never tried e-cigarettes, e-cigarette users were more likely to be younger, male, non-Hispanic white, non-married, poorer, and current smokers. Multivariable logistic regression suggested that respondents with high school or some college education had significantly higher adjusted odds of ever using e-cigarettes relative to those with less than high school education. However, the adjusted odds were not significantly different for college or graduate school education. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, unlike tobacco use, ever using e-cigarettes is positively related to income. Interestingly, e-cigarette use exhibits a non-linear relationship with education. Reasons for the relationship of e-cigarettes with education are unclear and warrant further research.
Authors: Godfred O Antwi; David K Lohrmann; Wasantha Jayawardene; Angela Chow; Cecilia S Obeng; Aaron M Sayegh Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Dongmei Li; Isaac K Sundar; Scott McIntosh; Deborah J Ossip; Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Richard J O'Connor; Irfan Rahman Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Lauren F Chun; Farzad Moazed; Carolyn S Calfee; Michael A Matthay; Jeffrey E Gotts Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Shannon Gravely; James F Thrasher; K Michael Cummings; Janine Ouimet; Ann McNeill; Gang Meng; Eric N Lindblom; Ruth Loewen; Richard J O'Connor; Mary E Thompson; Sara C Hitchman; David Hammond; Bryan W Heckman; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Tara Elton-Marshall; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Coral Gartner; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Laili Kharazi Boozary; Summer G Frank-Pearce; Adam C Alexander; Joseph J C Waring; Sarah J Ehlke; Michael S Businelle; Amy M Cohn; Darla E Kendzor Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: LáShauntá M Glover; Jennie Z Ma; Anshula Kesh; Lindsay K Tompkins; Joy L Hart; Delvon T Mattingly; Kandi Walker; Rose Marie Robertson; Tom Payne; Mario Sims Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 4.637