Literature DB >> 27987856

Development of in vitro resistance to chitosan is related to changes in cell envelope structure of Staphylococcus aureus.

Dina Raafat1, Nicole Leib2, Miriam Wilmes3, Patrice François4, Jacques Schrenzel5, Hans-Georg Sahl6.   

Abstract

The bacterial cell envelope is believed to be a principal target for initiating the staphylocidal pathway of chitosan. The present study was therefore designed to investigate possible changes in cell surface phenotypes related to the in vitro chitosan resistance development in the laboratory strain S. aureus SG511-Berlin. Following a serial passage experiment, a stable chitosan-resistant variant (CRV) was identified, exhibiting >50-fold reduction in its sensitivity towards chitosan. Our analyses of the CRV identified phenotypic and genotypic features that readily distinguished it from its chitosan-susceptible parental strain, including: (i) a lower overall negative cell surface charge; (ii) cross-resistance to a number of antimicrobial agents; (iii) major alterations in cell envelope structure, cellular bioenergetics and metabolism (based on transcriptional profiling); and (iv) a repaired sensor histidine kinase GraS. Our data therefore suggest a close nexus between changes in cell envelope properties with the in vitro chitosan-resistant phenotype in S. aureus SG511-Berlin.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic resistance; Chitosan; Microarray analysis; Phospholipids analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27987856     DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carbohydr Polym        ISSN: 0144-8617            Impact factor:   9.381


  6 in total

Review 1.  Chitosan's biological activity upon skin-related microorganisms and its potential textile applications.

Authors:  Eduardo M Costa; Sara Silva; Mariana Veiga; Freni K Tavaria; Maria M Pintado
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Constitutive chitosanase from Bacillus thuringiensis B-387 and its potential for preparation of antimicrobial chitooligomers.

Authors:  Gleb E Aktuganov; Violetta R Safina; Nailya F Galimzianova; Elena A Gilvanova; Lyudmila Yu Kuzmina; Alexander I Melentiev; Andrei H Baymiev; Sergey A Lopatin
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.253

Review 3.  Potential natural polymer-based nanofibres for the development of facemasks in countering viral outbreaks.

Authors:  Vigneshwaran Shanmugam; Karthik Babu; Thomas F Garrison; Antonio J Capezza; Richard T Olsson; Seeram Ramakrishna; Mikael S Hedenqvist; Shuvra Singha; Mattia Bartoli; Mauro Giorcelli; Gabriel Sas; Michael Försth; Oisik Das; Ágoston Restás; Filippo Berto
Journal:  J Appl Polym Sci       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.125

4.  Genetic Determinants Enabling Medium-Dependent Adaptation to Nafcillin in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Michael J Salazar; Henrique Machado; Nicholas A Dillon; Hannah Tsunemoto; Richard Szubin; Samira Dahesh; Joseph Pogliano; George Sakoulas; Bernhard O Palsson; Victor Nizet; Adam M Feist
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 6.496

5.  Association of mprF mutations with cross-resistance to daptomycin and vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Kanate Thitiananpakorn; Yoshifumi Aiba; Xin-Ee Tan; Shinya Watanabe; Kotaro Kiga; Yusuke Sato'o; Tanit Boonsiri; Feng-Yu Li; Teppei Sasahara; Yusuke Taki; Aa Haeruman Azam; Yuancheng Zhang; Longzhu Cui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A mechanistic study on the inhibition of bacterial growth and inflammation by Nerium oleander extract with comprehensive in vivo safety profile.

Authors:  Yousra Shafiq; Syed Baqir Shyum Naqvi; Ghazala H Rizwani; Muhammad Arif Asghar; Rabia Bushra; Sana Ghayas; Ahad Abdul Rehman; Muhammad Asif Asghar
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2021-05-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.