Literature DB >> 27987717

Effect of different types of prosthetic platforms on stress-distribution in dental implant-supported prostheses.

Lurian Minatel1, Fellippo Ramos Verri2, Guilherme Abu Halawa Kudo1, Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida2, Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista2, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos2, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer2, Joel Ferreira Santiago3.   

Abstract

A biomechanical analysis of different types of implant connections is relevant to clinical practice because it may impact the longevity of the rehabilitation treatment. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the Morse taper connections and the stress distribution of structures associated with the platform switching (PSW) concept. It will do this by obtaining data on the biomechanical behavior of the main structure in relation to the dental implant using the 3-dimensional finite element methodology. Four models were simulated (with each containing a single prosthesis over the implant) in the molar region, with the following specifications: M1 and M2 is an external hexagonal implant on a regular platform; M3 is an external hexagonal implant using PSW concept; and M4 is a Morse taper implant. The modeling process involved the use of images from InVesalius CT (computed tomography) processing software, which were refined using Rhinoceros 4.0 and SolidWorks 2011 CAD software. The models were then exported into the finite element program (FEMAP 11.0) to configure the meshes. The models were processed using NeiNastram software. The main results are that M1 (regular diameter 4mm) had the highest stress concentration area and highest microstrain concentration for bone tissue, dental implants, and the retaining screw (P<0.05). Using the PSW concept increases the area of the stress concentrations in the retaining screw (P<0.05) more than in the regular platform implant. It was concluded that the increase in diameter is beneficial for stress distribution and that the PSW concept had higher stress concentrations in the retaining screw and the crown compared to the regular platform implant.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bone tissue; Dental implant; Finite element analysis; Mechanical stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27987717     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  3 in total

1.  Morphogeometric analysis for characterization of keratoconus considering the spatial localization and projection of apex and minimum corneal thickness point.

Authors:  Jose S Velázquez; Francisco Cavas; David P Piñero; Francisco J F Cañavate; Jorge Alio Del Barrio; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 10.479

2.  Effects of cementless fixation of implant prosthesis: A finite element study.

Authors:  Hyeonjong Lee; Soyeon Park; Kung-Rock Kwon; Gunwoo Noh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Bone and Abutment-Implant Interface under Static and Cyclic Loadings.

Authors:  Saeed Nokar; Hamid Jalali; Farideh Nozari; Mahnaz Arshad
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2020-09-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.