Literature DB >> 27987454

Patient-reported outcomes in ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review.

Madeleine T King1, Zoë E Winters2, Ivo A Olivotto3, Andrew J Spillane4, Boon H Chua5, Christobel Saunders6, A Helen Westenberg7, G Bruce Mann8, Petrina Burnett9, Phyllis Butow10, Claudia Rutherford11.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive breast cancer with excellent prognosis but with potential adverse impacts of diagnosis and treatment on quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We undertook a systematic review to synthesise current evidence about PROs following diagnosis and treatment for DCIS. We searched five electronic databases (from database inception to November 2015), cross-referenced and contacted experts to identify studies that reported PROs after DCIS treatment. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and quality criteria, and extracted findings. Of 2130 papers screened, 23 were eligible, reporting 17 studies. Short- and long-term PRO evidence about differences between DCIS treatment options was lacking. Evidence pooled across treatments indicated core aspects of quality of life (physical, role, social, emotional function, pain, fatigue) and psychological distress (anxiety, depression) were impacted significantly initially, with most aspects returning to population norms by 6-12 months, and all by 2 years post-operatively. Fears of recurrence and dying from breast cancer were exaggerated, occurred early and persisted for many years. Sexuality and body image impacts were generally low and resolved within 1-3 months after surgery. A minority of women experienced considerable impact, including depression and sexual issues associated with body image problems. Well-powered PRO studies are required to track recovery trajectories and long-term impacts of the range of contemporary and emerging local and systemic treatments for DCIS. PRO data would enable care providers to prepare patients for short-term sequelae and enable patients who have treatment options to exercise preferences in choosing among them.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Body image; Carcinoma, intraductal, noninfiltrating; Depression; Pain; Patient outcome assessment; Quality of life; Sexuality; Stress, psychological

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27987454     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  11 in total

1.  Psychological morbidity in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ compared with women with early breast cancer receiving radiotherapy.

Authors:  William Pidduck; Bo Angela Wan; Liying Zhang; Eileen Rakovitch; Selina Chow; Stephanie Chan; Caitlin Yee; Leah Drost; Philomena Sousa; Donna Lewis; Henry Lam; Eric Leung; Edward Chow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Introduction to the special section "Reducing research waste in (health-related) quality of life research".

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Jan R Boehnke
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 3.440

Review 3.  Prediction Models and Decision Aids for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Renée S J M Schmitz; Erica A Wilthagen; Frederieke van Duijnhoven; Marja van Oirsouw; Ellen Verschuur; Thomas Lynch; Rinaa S Punglia; E Shelley Hwang; Jelle Wesseling; Marjanka K Schmidt; Eveline M A Bleiker; Ellen G Engelhardt
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Overdiagnosis in primary care: framing the problem and finding solutions.

Authors:  Minal S Kale; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-08-14

5.  Advanced Clinical Stage at Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Is Associated with Poorer Health-Related Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Julia de Mello Ramirez Medina; Ingrid de Araujo Trugilho; Giovanna Nunes Belo Mendes; Josiel Guedes Silva; Maria Alexsandra da Silva Paiva; Suzana Sales de Aguiar; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler; Anke Bergmann
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-12-19

6.  A web-based personalized decision support tool for patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ: development, content evaluation, and usability testing.

Authors:  Ilona Fridman; Lok Chan; Jennifer Thomas; Laura J Fish; Margaret Falkovic; Jacquelyn Brioux; Nicole Hunter; Daniel H Ryser; E Shelley Hwang; Kathryn I Pollak; Kevin P Weinfurt; Marc D Ryser
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women.

Authors:  Bryanna B Nyhof; Frances C Wright; Nicole J Look Hong; Gary Groot; Lucy Helyer; Pamela Meiers; May Lynn Quan; Nancy N Baxter; Robin Urquhart; Rebecca Warburton; Anna R Gagliardi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Women's Acceptance of Overdetection in Breast Cancer Screening: Can We Assess Harm-Benefit Tradeoffs?

Authors:  Anne Stiggelbout; Tessa Copp; Gemma Jacklyn; Jesse Jansen; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; Kirsten McCaffery; Jolyn Hersch
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): The importance of patient-reported outcomes (PRO).

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Shoshana M Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2020-04-04

10.  Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Brooke Nickel; Kirsten McCaffery; Nehmat Houssami; Jesse Jansen; Christobel Saunders; Andrew Spillane; Claudia Rutherford; Ann Dixon; Alexandra Barratt; Kirsty Stuart; Geraldine Robertson; Jolyn Hersch
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.