Literature DB >> 27987257

A new tool to improve delivery of patient-engaged care and satisfaction in facial treatments: the Aesthetic Global Ranking Scale.

Ravi Jain1, Peter Huang2, Rodrigo M Ferraz3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians face the challenge of individualizing aesthetic treatments in order to match the aesthetic needs of patients with their expectations.
OBJECTIVE: To review issues underlying patient satisfaction with minimally invasive aesthetic treatment and to present a patient-centric assessment tool (the Global Ranking Scale [GRS]) designed to set higher standards for patient consultation and treatment experience; ensure a comprehensive patient-centric aesthetic consultation process; and raise patient satisfaction with facial rejuvenation treatment.
METHODS: A review of the design and content of the GRS and its use as part of the wider Galderma Harmony Program. Results of a small survey of clinicians who have switched to the GRS, and case studies of patients who have used the tool, are also presented.
RESULTS: The GRS is used in ~500 clinics around the world. In a small survey, physicians who have used the GRS report that it has changed the way that patients are assessed and treated. While no patient survey was conducted, anecdotal evidence suggests that patients are satisfied with the GRS procedure and the outcomes of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The GRS is a new patient assessment tool that is designed as a guide for clinicians to help ensure consistency in the quality of patient assessment and consultation in their clinics offering minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures. Qualitative research suggests that it gives patients a better chance to achieve results aligned with their needs resulting in a higher level of satisfaction with aesthetic treatments, but this needs to be confirmed in a formal patient survey.
© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic Global Ranking Scale; consultation skills; facial rejuvenation; minimally invasive aesthetic treatment; patient assessment tool; patient satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27987257     DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol        ISSN: 1473-2130            Impact factor:   2.696


  5 in total

1.  A Prospective Trial of the Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency System Application in the Treatment of Infraorbital Dark Circles.

Authors:  Xianglei Wu; Ying Liu; Jiafang Zhu; Wenxin Yu; Xiaoxi Lin
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2022-07-08

2.  The Importance of Functional Quality in Patient Satisfaction: Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study-Part 2.

Authors:  Cara B McDonald; Izolda Heydenrych
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-05-08

3.  Repeated Full-Face Aesthetic Combination Treatment With AbobotulinumtoxinA, Hyaluronic Acid Filler, and Skin-Boosting Hyaluronic Acid After Monotherapy With AbobotulinumtoxinA or Hyaluronic Acid Filler.

Authors:  Hugues Cartier; Per Hedén; Henry Delmar; Per Bergentz; Cecilia Skoglund; Carolina Edwartz; Maria Norberg; Philippe Kestemont
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.914

4.  Improvements in the perception of facial attractiveness following surgical aesthetic treatment; study based on online before and after photos.

Authors:  Mateusz Przylipiak; Jerzy Przylipiak; Robert Terlikowski; Emilia Lubowicka; Lech Chrostek; Andrzej Przylipiak
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  A Single-Center Study Evaluating the Effects of a Novel Retinol and Cannabidiol Combination Topical on Facial Skin.

Authors:  Julius Few; Michael J Lee; Alec Semersky; Emily Mariscal; Ginny Vachon
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-01-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.