Literature DB >> 2798689

Self-report during feedback regulation of slow cortical potentials.

L E Roberts, N Birbaumer, B Rockstroh, W Lutzenberger, T Elbert.   

Abstract

Subjects received exteroceptive feedback for bidirectional changes in slow cortical potentials or alpha power measured from the vertex. The slow potential group succeeded in shifting slow potentials toward negativity and positivity on feedback and transfer trials requiring these changes, after two sessions of training. Differentiation of negativity and positivity was accompanied by verbal reports of somatomotor activation that occurred on trials on which negative slow potentials were required (p less than .01). Vertical and lateral eye movements, chin and frontalis electromyogram, and heart rate did not differentiate between negativity and positivity trials in the slow potential negativity during feedback. Although the alpha power group did not succeed at controlling changes in alpha, evidence of a training effect appeared in verbal reports of emotional arousal (p less than .05) and focused vision (p less than .08) on alpha suppression trials in this group. We discuss the findings from the viewpoint that biofeedback tasks involving electrocortical responses are problems in the organization of action that subjects seek to solve.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2798689     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb01941.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  14 in total

1.  Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in psychiatric patients: depression.

Authors:  F Schneider; H Heimann; R Mattes; W Lutzenberger; N Birbaumer
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1992-09

2.  Real time fMRI feedback of the anterior cingulate and posterior insular cortex in the processing of pain.

Authors:  Mariela Rance; Michaela Ruttorf; Frauke Nees; Lothar Rudi Schad; Herta Flor
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Improving visual perception through neurofeedback.

Authors:  Frank Scharnowski; Chloe Hutton; Oliver Josephs; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Slow cortical potential biofeedback and the startle reflex.

Authors:  S Brody; H Rau; F Köhler; H Schupp; W Lutzenberger; N Birbaumer
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1994-03

5.  Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in psychiatric patients: schizophrenia.

Authors:  F Schneider; B Rockstroh; H Heimann; W Lutzenberger; R Mattes; T Elbert; N Birbaumer; M Bartels
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1992-12

6.  Behavioural treatment of slow cortical potentials in intractable epilepsy: neuropsychological predictors of outcome.

Authors:  I Daum; B Rockstroh; N Birbaumer; T Elbert; A Canavan; W Lutzenberger
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Anterior insular cortex regulation in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Andrea Caria; Simona de Falco
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Manipulating motor performance and memory through real-time fMRI neurofeedback.

Authors:  Frank Scharnowski; Ralf Veit; Regine Zopf; Petra Studer; Simon Bock; Jörn Diedrichsen; Rainer Goebel; Klaus Mathiak; Niels Birbaumer; Nikolaus Weiskopf
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  What learning theories can teach us in designing neurofeedback treatments.

Authors:  Ute Strehl
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Control beliefs can predict the ability to up-regulate sensorimotor rhythm during neurofeedback training.

Authors:  Matthias Witte; Silvia Erika Kober; Manuel Ninaus; Christa Neuper; Guilherme Wood
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.