Literature DB >> 27986762

Wearable, yes, but able…?: it is time for evidence-based marketing claims!

Billy Sperlich1, Hans-Christer Holmberg2,3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; Fitness testing; Protective clothing

Year:  2016        PMID: 27986762      PMCID: PMC5537552          DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


× No keyword cloud information.
With great interest, we1 have been following the growing popularity of non-invasive wearable sensor technology as a way to increase physical performance, assist recovery or monitor health. These sensors, integrated into clothing worn on the body, are often referred to as ‘wearables’ or ‘wearable technology’. The popularity of the wearables is mainly due to three recent advances: (1) miniature sensor technology,1 (2) telemetric transfer and (web-based) storage of personal data and (3) extension of battery life. According to a worldwide survey of fitness trends, wearable technology appears set to be the number 1 trend in 2017,2 with expected sales for some wearables in the range of 1.5–2.6 billion US$.2 We believe that this type of technology will be a central tool in the fitness and health industry, provided some fundamental issues are dealt with. More specifically, prototype evaluation and market launching of new products must be supported through scientific validation and some ethical issues must be considered. In this context, numerous studies aiming to assess the validity and reliability of wearable sensors have been conducted, especially after market launch. They show that many non-invasive wearable sensor technologies have questionable validity and reliability when used in various sport settings and populations.1 3 We believe the overly hasty launch of non-evaluated wearable products is problematic. One of the world's largest sport medicine communities, the American College of Sports Medicine, claims that ‘Exercise is Medicine’. If we assume that wearable technology could assist in the health-enhancing process of exercise, for example, to control body weight (by estimating energy expenditure), or monitor cardiac and metabolic function (eg, by measuring variables of heart rate precisely), we cannot understand why wearable devices employing biological data for health purposes are not required to undergo rigorous evaluation prior to being launched on the market. It is, after all, obligatory for the pharmaceutical industries to test their products. Manufacturers undoubtedly invest a great portion of their budget into prototype development; however, validation and reliability studies are often performed inhouse by the company itself, without external evaluation (at least until the products enter the market). Aggressive and exaggerated marketing claims are another critical concern. In our opinion, developers' marketing claims concerning non-invasive wearable technology should be backed by scientific evidence and verified independently before the devices are launched on the sports, fitness and health market. In the past, companies making dubious marketing claims of fitness products without scientific back-up have been punished with severe fines4 and similar lawsuits are currently pending.5 We strongly recommend that all parties involved in consumer health and fitness care (ie, companies, governing bodies, customer care, technical and medical inspection agencies) to perform and demand prototype validation and to control and monitor the launching of sensor-based technology for health and fitness purposes. Wearable technology provides an opportunity to collect a huge amount of personal data and also open a possibility for (big data) analysis to improve health and performance. But does it make sense—and is it ethically defensible—to collect and analyse data of questionable accuracy? Wearable technology truly has merit as it may stimulate a broad population to pursue life-long health-enhancing exercise and improve individual performance. Do they pose a threat to personal integrity? These questions have been posed quite often since companies began pushing new technology onto the fitness and health market backed by strong and often unsubstantiated marketing claims. Inspired by the discussion of evidence-based medicine,6 we believe it is time to demand ‘evidence-based marketing claims' (1) to ensure the safe use of wearable technology and (2) to use the technology's full potential to maintain and improve health and performance.
  3 in total

1.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

2.  Accuracy of Heart Rate Watches: Implications for Weight Management.

Authors:  Matthew P Wallen; Sjaan R Gomersall; Shelley E Keating; Ulrik Wisløff; Jeff S Coombes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Comparison of Non-Invasive Individual Monitoring of the Training and Health of Athletes with Commercially Available Wearable Technologies.

Authors:  Peter Düking; Andreas Hotho; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Franz Konstantin Fuss; Billy Sperlich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total
  23 in total

1.  A Comparison of a Novel Stretchable Smart Patch for Measuring Runner's Step Rates with Existing Measuring Technologies.

Authors:  Nina Verdel; Miha Drobnič; Jan Maslik; Klara Björnander Rahimi; Giorgio Tantillo; Alessandro Gumiero; Klas Hjort; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Matej Supej
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network.

Authors:  William Johnston; Pedro B Judice; Pablo Molina García; Jan M Mühlen; Esben Lykke Skovgaard; Julie Stang; Moritz Schumann; Shulin Cheng; Wilhelm Bloch; Jan Christian Brønd; Ulf Ekelund; Anders Grøntved; Brian Caulfield; Francisco B Ortega; Luis B Sardinha
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Prescribing of Electronic Activity Monitors in Cardiometabolic Diseases: Qualitative Interview-Based Study.

Authors:  Alice Bellicha; Sandrine Macé; Jean-Michel Oppert
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 4.  Skin Temperature Measurement Using Contact Thermometry: A Systematic Review of Setup Variables and Their Effects on Measured Values.

Authors:  Braid A MacRae; Simon Annaheim; Christina M Spengler; René M Rossi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  The Responses of Elite Athletes to Exercise: An All-Day, 24-h Integrative View Is Required!

Authors:  Billy Sperlich; Hans-Christer Holmberg
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  The Use of Body Worn Sensors for Detecting the Vibrations Acting on the Lower Back in Alpine Ski Racing.

Authors:  Jörg Spörri; Josef Kröll; Benedikt Fasel; Kamiar Aminian; Erich Müller
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  A SWOT Analysis of the Use and Potential Misuse of Implantable Monitoring Devices by Athletes.

Authors:  Billy Sperlich; Peter Düking; Hans-Christer Holmberg
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Instant Biofeedback Provided by Wearable Sensor Technology Can Help to Optimize Exercise and Prevent Injury and Overuse.

Authors:  Peter Düking; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Billy Sperlich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Sedentary Behavior among National Elite Rowers during Off-Training-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Billy Sperlich; Martin Becker; Andreas Hotho; Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich; Mahdi Sareban; Kay Winkert; Jürgen M Steinacker; Gunnar Treff
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Criterion-Validity of Commercially Available Physical Activity Tracker to Estimate Step Count, Covered Distance and Energy Expenditure during Sports Conditions.

Authors:  Yvonne Wahl; Peter Düking; Anna Droszez; Patrick Wahl; Joachim Mester
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.