Literature DB >> 27986368

Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.

Blake B Anderson1, Daniel T Oberlin2, Aria A Razmaria3, Bonnie Choy4, Gregory P Zagaja3, Arieh L Shalhav3, Joshua J Meeks2, Ximing J Yang5, Gladell P Paner6, Scott E Eggener3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of men with Gleason score 6 (GS6) prostate cancer undergo treatment with radiation or surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To assess pathologic stage of pure GS6 at radical prostatectomy (RP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In the period 2003-2014, 7817 patients underwent RP at two institutions. Of 2502 patients with GS6 at surgery, 60 were identified as stage pT3a-b on initial pathologic review, 55 with pT3a (extraprostatic extension, EPE), and five with pT3b (seminal vesicle invasion; SVI). All cases of GS6 with pT3 disease underwent contemporary pathologic evaluation for Gleason grade, stage, and extent of EPE. At one institution, all GS≥7 pT3b cases were re-reviewed for downgrading. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Gleason grading criteria and 2009 ISUP recommendations on pT3 staging were applied. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Calculated incidence (%) of pT3a, pT3b, pT4, and lymph node-positive disease. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 60 GS6 pT3a-b cases identified in the period 2003-2014, seven (0.28% of entire GS6 cohort) with GS6 and pT3a were identified after re-review, all focal EPE. Among the re-examined cohort, no cases of GS6 with pT3b were observed. None of the 132 GS≥7 pT3b cases were downgraded to GS6. Limitations include partial embedding of specimens and separate pathologic review at each institution.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large prostatectomy cohort, GS6 never had seminal vesicle invasion (0%) and was very rarely (0.28%) associated with extraprostatic extension. PATIENT
SUMMARY: GS6 prostate cancer rarely spreads outside the prostate. A new finding in this study was that GS6 prostate cancer never spread to the seminal vesicles.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Male; Neoplasm grading; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Seminal vesicles

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27986368     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  8 in total

Review 1.  Future Perspectives and Challenges of Prostate MR Imaging.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Digital versus light microscopy assessment of extraprostatic extension in radical prostatectomy samples.

Authors:  Metka Volavšek; Vanessa Henriques; Ana Blanca; Rodolfo Montironi; Liang Cheng; Maria R Raspollini; Alessia Cimadamore; Nuno Vau; Francesco Pierconti; Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  [Can progression of prostate cancer be reliably diagnosed using serial magnetic resonance imaging during active surveillance?]

Authors:  Analena Elisa Handke; Markus Graefen; Tim Ullrich; Andreas Wibmer; Boris Alexander Hadaschik; Francesco Giganti; Lars Schimmöller; Jan Philipp Radtke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  CUA 2022 Annual Meeting Abstracts - Poster Session 9: Oncology - Prostate Sunday, June 26, 2022 • 07:30-09:00.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.052

5.  Should Grade Group 1 (GG1) be called cancer?

Authors:  Craig V Labbate; Gladell P Paner; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for low-risk prostate cancer induces biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy via increased lymphangiogenesis-related parameters.

Authors:  Yasuyoshi Miyata; Yuichiro Nakamura; Takuji Yasuda; Tomohiro Matsuo; Kojiro Ohba; Bungo Furusato; Junya Fukuoka; Hideki Sakai
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model.

Authors:  Satoru Taguchi; Yukari Uemura; Tetsuya Fujimura; Teppei Morikawa; Akihiro Naito; Taketo Kawai; Motofumi Suzuki; Haruki Kume; Hiroshi Fukuhara
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  How Much Reliable Is the Current Belief on Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Mun Su Chung; Yeong Jin Choi; Young Sub Lee; Byung Il Yoon; U-Syn Ha
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.201

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.