Literature DB >> 27984791

Does economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? A comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries.

Mehdi Abid1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) with a sample of 58 MEA (Middle East & African) and 41 EU (European Union) countries for the period 1990 to 2011. The empirical analysis is carried out using the GMM-system method to solve the problem of endogenous variables. We focused on direct and indirect effects of institutional quality (through the efficiency of public expenditure, financial development, trade openness and foreign direct investment) and the income-emission relationship. We found a monotonically increasing relationship between CO2 emissions and GDP in both MEA and EU regions. The policy implication is clear: in order to have sustainable positive economic performance and to reduce carbon dioxide emission in the country at the same time, policy makers should regulate and enhance the role and efficiency of domestic institutions.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EU and MEA countries; Environmental Kuznets curve; GMM panel; Institutional quality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27984791     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  10 in total

1.  Financial development and its moderating role in environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Pakistan.

Authors:  Songsheng Chen; Nyla Saleem; Muhammad Waseem Bari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies.

Authors:  Shoukat Iqbal Khattak; Manzoor Ahmad; Zia Ullah Khan; Anwar Khan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models.

Authors:  Faik Bilgili; Recep Ulucak; Emrah Koçak; Salih Çağrı İlkay
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Moderating role of financial development in environmental Kuznets: a case study of Malaysia.

Authors:  Abid Rashid Gill; Sallahuddin Hassan; Muhammad Haseeb
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Economic growth, financial development, and trade in nexuses of CO2 emissions for Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Misbah Nosheen; Javed Iqbal; Syeda Anam Hassan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Dynamic Driving Mechanism of Dual Structural Effects on the Correlation between Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from a Typical Transformation Region.

Authors:  Yu Cai; Haiyan Duan; Zhiqiang Luo; Zhiyuan Duan; Xian'en Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The Impact of Energy Productivity and Eco-Innovation on Sustainable Environment in Emerging Seven (E-7) Countries: Does Institutional Quality Matter?

Authors:  Adnan Safi; Yingying Chen; Liya Zheng
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-06

8.  Do Multi-Market Institutions and Renewable Energy Matter for Sustainable Development: A Panel Data Investigation.

Authors:  Najid Ahmad; Fredj Jawadi; Muhammad Azam
Journal:  Comput Econ       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 1.741

9.  Assessment of the Impact of Higher Education on Environmental Quality in BRICS Economies Based on Sustainable Development Pathways.

Authors:  Miao Guo
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-09-22

10.  Testing the moderating role of trade openness on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a novel approach.

Authors:  Taimur Sharif; Mirza Md Moyen Uddin; Constantinos Alexiou
Journal:  Ann Oper Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.854

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.