Literature DB >> 27984661

A global database of ant species abundances.

Heloise Gibb1, Rob R Dunn2,3, Nathan J Sanders3, Blair F Grossman1, Manoli Photakis1, Silvia Abril4, Donat Agosti5, Alan N Andersen6, Elena Angulo7, Inge Armbrecht8, Xavier Arnan9, Fabricio B Baccaro10, Tom R Bishop11,12, Raphaël Boulay13, Carsten Brühl14, Cristina Castracani15, Xim Cerda7, Israel Del Toro3, Thibaut Delsinne16, Mireia Diaz4, David A Donoso17, Aaron M Ellison18,19,20, Martha L Enriquez4, Tom M Fayle21,22, Donald H Feener23, Brian L Fisher24, Robert N Fisher25, Matthew C Fitzpatrick26, Crisanto Gómez4, Nicholas J Gotelli27, Aaron Gove28,29, Donato A Grasso15, Sarah Groc30, Benoit Guenard31, Nihara Gunawardene29, Brian Heterick29, Benjamin Hoffmann6, Milan Janda21,32, Clinton Jenkins33, Michael Kaspari34, Petr Klimes21,35, Lori Lach36, Thomas Laeger37, John Lattke38, Maurice Leponce39, Jean-Philippe Lessard40, John Longino23, Andrea Lucky41, Sarah H Luke42,43, Jonathan Majer29,44, Terrence P McGlynn45,46, Sean Menke47, Dirk Mezger48, Alessandra Mori15, Jimmy Moses21,35, Thinandavha Caswell Munyai49, Renata Pacheco30, Omid Paknia50, Jessica Pearce-Duvet23, Martin Pfeiffer51, Stacy M Philpott52, Julian Resasco53, Javier Retana54, Rogerio R Silva55, Magdalena D Sorger2, Jorge Souza56, Andrew Suarez57, Melanie Tista58, Heraldo L Vasconcelos30, Merav Vonshak59, Michael D Weiser34, Michelle Yates60, Catherine L Parr11.   

Abstract

What forces structure ecological assemblages? A key limitation to general insights about assemblage structure is the availability of data that are collected at a small spatial grain (local assemblages) and a large spatial extent (global coverage). Here, we present published and unpublished data from 51 ,388 ant abundance and occurrence records of more than 2,693 species and 7,953 morphospecies from local assemblages collected at 4,212 locations around the world. Ants were selected because they are diverse and abundant globally, comprise a large fraction of animal biomass in most terrestrial communities, and are key contributors to a range of ecosystem functions. Data were collected between 1949 and 2014, and include, for each geo-referenced sampling site, both the identity of the ants collected and details of sampling design, habitat type, and degree of disturbance. The aim of compiling this data set was to provide comprehensive species abundance data in order to test relationships between assemblage structure and environmental and biogeographic factors. Data were collected using a variety of standardized methods, such as pitfall and Winkler traps, and will be valuable for studies investigating large-scale forces structuring local assemblages. Understanding such relationships is particularly critical under current rates of global change. We encourage authors holding additional data on systematically collected ant assemblages, especially those in dry and cold, and remote areas, to contact us and contribute their data to this growing data set.
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.

Keywords:  Formicidae; Winkler trap; abundance; ants; database; disturbance; geo-referenced; habitat; local assemblage; occurrence; pitfall trap

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27984661     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Density dependence and the spread of invasive big-headed ants (Pheidole megacephala) in an East African savanna.

Authors:  Alejandro G Pietrek; Jacob R Goheen; Corinna Riginos; Nelly J Maiyo; Todd M Palmer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Improving estimates of global ant biomass and abundance.

Authors:  Tom M Fayle; Petr Klimes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth.

Authors:  Patrick Schultheiss; Sabine S Nooten; Runxi Wang; Mark K L Wong; François Brassard; Benoit Guénard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Low levels of intraspecific trait variation in a keystone invertebrate group.

Authors:  Clara A Gaudard; Mark P Robertson; Tom R Bishop
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The global distribution of known and undiscovered ant biodiversity.

Authors:  Jamie M Kass; Benoit Guénard; Kenneth L Dudley; Clinton N Jenkins; Fumika Azuma; Brian L Fisher; Catherine L Parr; Heloise Gibb; John T Longino; Philip S Ward; Anne Chao; David Lubertazzi; Michael Weiser; Walter Jetz; Robert Guralnick; Rumsaïs Blatrix; James Des Lauriers; David A Donoso; Christos Georgiadis; Kiko Gomez; Peter G Hawkes; Robert A Johnson; John E Lattke; Joe A MacGown; William Mackay; Simon Robson; Nathan J Sanders; Robert R Dunn; Evan P Economo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 14.957

6.  Blind spots in global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function research.

Authors:  Carlos A Guerra; Anna Heintz-Buschart; Johannes Sikorski; Antonis Chatzinotas; Nathaly Guerrero-Ramírez; Simone Cesarz; Léa Beaumelle; Matthias C Rillig; Fernando T Maestre; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; François Buscot; Jörg Overmann; Guillaume Patoine; Helen R P Phillips; Marten Winter; Tesfaye Wubet; Kirsten Küsel; Richard D Bardgett; Erin K Cameron; Don Cowan; Tine Grebenc; César Marín; Alberto Orgiazzi; Brajesh K Singh; Diana H Wall; Nico Eisenhauer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  The Role of Dopamine in the Collective Regulation of Foraging in Harvester Ants.

Authors:  Daniel A Friedman; Anna Pilko; Dorota Skowronska-Krawczyk; Karolina Krasinska; Jacqueline W Parker; Jay Hirsh; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-09-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.