Literature DB >> 27984507

Perceived Stress After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Comparison Between Young and Middle-Aged Women Versus Men.

Xiao Xu1, Haikun Bao, Kelly M Strait, Donald E Edmondson, Karina W Davidson, John F Beltrame, Héctor Bueno, Haiqun Lin, Rachel P Dreyer, John E Brush, John A Spertus, Judith H Lichtman, Gail DʼOnofrio, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine how psychological stress changes over time in young and middle-aged patients after experiencing an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and whether these changes differ between men and women.
METHODS: We analyzed data obtained from 2358 women and 1151 men aged 18 to 55 years hospitalized for AMI. Psychological stress was measured using the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) at initial hospitalization and at 1 month and 12 months after AMI. We used linear mixed-effects models to examine changes in PSS-14 scores over time and sex differences in these changes, while adjusting for patient characteristics and accounting for correlation among repeated observations within patients.
RESULTS: Overall, patients' perceived stress decreased over time, especially during the first month after AMI. Women had higher levels of perceived stress than men throughout the 12-month period (difference in PSS-14 score = 3.63, 95% confidence interval = 3.08 to 4.18, p < .001), but they did not differ in how stress changed over time. Adjustment for patient characteristics did not alter the overall pattern of sex difference in changes of perceived stress over time other than attenuating the magnitude of sex difference in PSS-14 score (difference between women and men = 1.74, 95% confidence interval = 1.32 to 2.16, p < .001). The magnitude of sex differences in perceived stress was similar in patients with versus without post-AMI angina, even though patients with angina experienced less improvement in PSS-14 score than those without angina.
CONCLUSIONS: In young and middle-aged patients with AMI, women reported higher levels of perceived stress than men throughout the first 12 months of recovery. However, women and men had a similar pattern in how perceived stress changed over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27984507      PMCID: PMC5459399          DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  42 in total

1.  Assessment of differential item functioning in the Perceived Stress Scale-10.

Authors:  S R Cole
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  A short social support measure for patients recovering from myocardial infarction: the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory.

Authors:  Pamela H Mitchell; Lynda Powell; James Blumenthal; Jennifer Norten; Gail Ironson; Carol Rogers Pitula; Erika Sivarajan Froelicher; Susan Czajkowski; Marston Youngblood; Marc Huber; Lisa F Berkman
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 3.  Psychosocial factors and cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Susan A Everson-Rose; Tené T Lewis
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  30-year trends in patient characteristics, treatment practices, and long-term outcomes of adults aged 35 to 54 years hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mayra Tisminetzky; David D McManus; Joel M Gore; Jorge Yarzebski; Andrew Coles; Darleen Lessard; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds.

Authors:  G L Albrecht; P J Devlieger
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

8.  Perceived stress and biological risk: is the link stronger in Russians than in Taiwanese and Americans?

Authors:  Dana A Glei; Noreen Goldman; Vladimir M Shkolnikov; Dmitri Jdanov; Maria Shkolnikova; James W Vaupel; Maxine Weinstein
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.493

9.  Repressive coping style, acute stress disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Karni Ginzburg; Zahava Solomon; Avi Bleich
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  Associations of stressful life events and social strain with incident cardiovascular disease in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Kiarri N Kershaw; Gretchen A Brenes; Luenda E Charles; Mace Coday; Martha L Daviglus; Natalie L Denburg; Candyce H Kroenke; Monika M Safford; Tina Savla; Hilary A Tindle; Lesley F Tinker; Linda Van Horn
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Young Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Rachel P Dreyer; Christopher Sciria; Erica S Spatz; Basmah Safdar; Gail D'Onofrio; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-02-22

2.  Race and Gender Differences in the Association Between Experiences of Everyday Discrimination and Arterial Stiffness Among Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Samantha G Bromfield; Samaah Sullivan; Ryan Saelee; Lisa Elon; Bruno Lima; An Young; Irina Uphoff; Lian Li; Arshed Quyyumi; J Douglas Bremner; Viola Vaccarino; Tené T Lewis
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-10-01

3.  Telephone-based mindfulness training to reduce stress in women with myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tanya M Spruill; Harmony R Reynolds; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Amanda J Shallcross; Pallavi D Visvanathan; Chorong Park; Jolaade Kalinowski; Hua Zhong; Jeffrey S Berger; Judith S Hochman; Glenn I Fishman; Gbenga Ogedegbe
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 4.  Acute myocardial infarction in young women: current perspectives.

Authors:  Jaya Chandrasekhar; Amrita Gill; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-06-07

5.  Increasing Mortality From Premature Coronary Artery Disease in Women in the Rural United States.

Authors:  Matthias Bossard; Yllka Latifi; Matteo Fabbri; Reto Kurmann; Miriam Brinkert; Mathias Wolfrum; Benjamin Berte; Florim Cuculi; Stefan Toggweiler; Richard Kobza; Alanna M Chamberlain; Federico Moccetti
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Self-rated stress and experience in patients with Takotsubo syndrome: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Runa Sundelin; Chatarina Bergsten; Per Tornvall; Patrik Lyngå
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Perceived stress in Chinese patients with coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yifan Gao; Rong Hu; Yingyue Zhang; Menghan Yuan; Yong Xu; Jing Ma
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Go Red for Women Strategically Focused Research Network: Summary of Findings and Network Outcomes.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Brooke Aggarwal; Matthew A Allison; Jeffrey S Berger; Sheila F Castañeda; Janet Catov; Judith S Hochman; Carl A Hubel; Sanja Jelic; David A Kass; Nour Makarem; Erin D Michos; Lori Mosca; Pamela Ouyang; Chorong Park; Wendy S Post; Robert W Powers; Harmony R Reynolds; Dorothy D Sears; Sanjiv J Shah; Kavita Sharma; Tanya Spruill; Gregory A Talavera; Dhananjay Vaidya
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  What Do We Know About Young Adult Cardiac Patients' Experience? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathan Journiac; Christel Vioulac; Anne Jacob; Coline Escarnot; Aurélie Untas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.