Literature DB >> 27984438

Assessing the Effectiveness of the Functional Movement Screen in Predicting Noncontact Injury Rates in Soccer Players.

Paul D Smith1, Michael P Hanlon.   

Abstract

Smith, PD, and Hanlon, D. Assessing the effectiveness of the functional movement screen in predicting noncontact injury rates in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 31(12): 3327-3332, 2017-This study assessed if the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) can accurately predict noncontact injury in adult soccer players when normalizing noncontact injury occurrence against match exposure levels. Senior male players (n = 89) from 5 League of Ireland semiprofessional clubs participated in the study (mean age = 23.2 ± 4.4 years; mean height = 179.5 ± 6.6 cm; mean body mass = 77.5 ± 7.8 kg). Participants performed the FMS during preseason, and their injury occurrence rates and match minutes were tracked throughout 1 season. In total, 66 noncontact injuries were recorded. No significant difference was found in FMS composite scores between players receiving noncontact injuries and players not suffering a noncontact injury (p = 0.96). There was no significant difference in exposure-normalized noncontact injury incidence between those scoring 14 or below and those scoring above 14 on the FMS (0.36 vs. 0.29 non-contact injuries per player per 1,000 match minutes). Players scoring 14 or below on the FMS had an odds ratio of 0.63 (p = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.19-2.07) of receiving a noncontact injury. Despite previous research showing links between low FMS composite scores and subsequent injury, these results suggest that the FMS cannot accurately predict a male soccer player's likelihood of receiving a noncontact injury and that a lower FMS composite score does not significantly increase their noncontact injury incidence rate per 1,000 match minutes. Caution should therefore be used when using the FMS as a predictor of noncontact injury, and pain prevalence during the FMS, previous injuries, and training/match exposure levels should also be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27984438     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Factors Influencing the Relationship Between the Functional Movement Screen and Injury Risk in Sporting Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma Moore; Samuel Chalmers; Steve Milanese; Joel T Fuller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Functional Movement Screen total score and physical performance in elite male collegiate soccer players.

Authors:  Sungcheol Lee; Hyungjun Kim; Jooyoung Kim
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2019-10-28

3.  THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN (FMS™) IN ELITE YOUNG SOCCER PLAYERS BETWEEN 14 AND 20 YEARS: COMPOSITE SCORE, INDIVIDUAL-TEST SCORES AND ASYMMETRIES.

Authors:  Vanessa Bernardes Marques; Thales Menezes Medeiros; Felipe de Souza Stigger; Fábio Yuzo Nakamura; Bruno Manfredini Baroni
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-11

4.  Study of the measurement and predictive validity of the Functional Movement Screen.

Authors:  Fraser Philp; Dimitra Blana; Edward K Chadwick; Caroline Stewart; Claire Stapleton; Kim Major; Anand D Pandyan
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-05-07

5.  Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Lee; Mei-Chich Hsu; Wen-Dien Chang; Szu-Chieh Wang; Chao-Yen Chen; Pei-Hsi Chou; Nai-Jen Chang
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.103

6.  Multiple athletic performances, maturation, and Functional Movement Screen total and individual scores across different age categories in young soccer players.

Authors:  Igor Bakalľár; Jaromír Šimonek; Janka Kanásová; Bohumila Krčmárová; Matúš Krčmár
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.