Anindita Ganguly1, Corissa McEwen2, Erika L Troy2, Raymond W Colburn2, Anthony O Caggiano2, Timothy J Schallert3, Tom J Parry2. 1. Acorda Therapeutics, 420 Sawmill River Road, Ardsley, NY 10502, United States. Electronic address: aganguly@acorda.com. 2. Acorda Therapeutics, 420 Sawmill River Road, Ardsley, NY 10502, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, SEA 4.208, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX 78712-1043, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) can result in neurodegenerative changes leading to motor, sensory and autonomic dysfunction. Injury to the rat sciatic nerve is used to model pathophysiologic processes following PNI and assess the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. Frequently, temporal changes in the sciatic functional index (SFI), a measure of sensorimotor integration are measured in rats to assess functional recovery following sciatic nerve injury. However, multiple rat strains and behavioral endpoints have been employed to investigate pathophysiology of PNI and impact of therapeutic intervention on recovery, raising the possibility that rat strain may influence the outcome of such studies. NEW METHOD: The temporal course of recovery from sham, sciatic nerve crush or transection injury was assessed using SFI determined by two methods (footprint and DigiGait), and proprioceptive hind limb placement (a measure of proprioceptive integrity) of the sciatic nerve innervation, in male Sprague Dawley, Lewis, Fischer, Wistar and Long Evans rats. RESULTS: The SFI profile, as assessed by both inked footprint analysis and DigiGait, following sciatic nerve injury was remarkably conserved across strains. Dramatic strain-related differences were observed in the latency to place the crush- or transection-injured hind limb following proprioceptive hind limb stimulation. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: The novelty of this study is the parallel comparison of multiple strains using existing and novel tests. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that some sensorimotor function tests may be sensitive to the choice of strain, as evidenced by the differences between SFI and proprioceptive function outcomes. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND:Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) can result in neurodegenerative changes leading to motor, sensory and autonomic dysfunction. Injury to the rat sciatic nerve is used to model pathophysiologic processes following PNI and assess the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. Frequently, temporal changes in the sciatic functional index (SFI), a measure of sensorimotor integration are measured in rats to assess functional recovery following sciatic nerve injury. However, multiple rat strains and behavioral endpoints have been employed to investigate pathophysiology of PNI and impact of therapeutic intervention on recovery, raising the possibility that rat strain may influence the outcome of such studies. NEW METHOD: The temporal course of recovery from sham, sciatic nerve crush or transection injury was assessed using SFI determined by two methods (footprint and DigiGait), and proprioceptive hind limb placement (a measure of proprioceptive integrity) of the sciatic nerve innervation, in male Sprague Dawley, Lewis, Fischer, Wistar and Long Evans rats. RESULTS: The SFI profile, as assessed by both inked footprint analysis and DigiGait, following sciatic nerve injury was remarkably conserved across strains. Dramatic strain-related differences were observed in the latency to place the crush- or transection-injured hind limb following proprioceptive hind limb stimulation. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: The novelty of this study is the parallel comparison of multiple strains using existing and novel tests. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that some sensorimotor function tests may be sensitive to the choice of strain, as evidenced by the differences between SFI and proprioceptive function outcomes. Copyright Â
Authors: Angel F Farinas; Isaac V Manzanera Esteve; Alonda C Pollins; Nancy L Cardwell; Mark D Does; Richard D Dortch; Wesley P Thayer Journal: Mil Med Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 1.437