| Literature DB >> 27983656 |
Jianli Cui1, Binzhen Zhang2, Junping Duan3, Hao Guo4, Jun Tang5.
Abstract
Flexible pressure sensors are essential components of electronic skins for future attractive applications ranging from human healthcare monitoring to biomedical diagnostics, robotic skins, and prosthetic limbs. Here we report a new kind of flexible pressure sensor. The sensors are capacitive, and composed of two Ag wrinkled electrodes separated by a carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) composite deformable dielectric layer. Ag wrinkled electrodes were formed by vacuum deposition on top of pre-strained and relaxed PDMS substrates which were treated using an O₂ plasma, a surface functionalization process, and a magnetron sputtering process. Ultimately, the developed sensor exhibits a maximum sensitivity of 19.80% kPa-1 to capacitance, great durability over 500 cycles, and rapid mechanical responses (<200 ms). We also demonstrate that our sensor can be used to effectively detect the location and distribution of finger pressure.Entities:
Keywords: Ag wrinkled electrodes; carbon nanotube; flexible sensor; pressure sensor
Year: 2016 PMID: 27983656 PMCID: PMC5191111 DOI: 10.3390/s16122131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Schematic diagrams of the fabrication procedure for the flexible pressure sensor: (1) SU-8 mold; (2) Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) casting; (3) PDMS mold; (4) Pre-strain PDMS; (5) Pre-strain relax after O2 plasma treatment; (6) Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) surface functionalization; (7) Ag wrinkled electrodes on the PDMS substrate after Ag sputtering; (8) Carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/PDMS elastomer dielectric layer; (9) Ag wrinkled electrodes on the PDMS substrate; (10) Flexible pressure sensor; (b) Laser confocal image of the electrode pattern; (c) Cross-section of the fabricated electrode from an SEM image; (d) digital image of a typical flexible pressure sensor with 3 × 3 detecting units.
Figure 2Characterization of different volume fraction of CNTs/PDMS elastomers. (a) Mechanical capacitance response of square CNTs/PDMS film (8 mm × 8 mm × 0.5 mm); (b) SEM images of CNTs/PDMS elastomers with different CNT concentrations.
Figure 3Experimental setup. The sensor was mounted in the pressure chamber. The applied force and capacitance change were measured by the pressure controller and capacitance meter, respectively.
Figure 4Characterization of the capacitive pressure response of the pressure sensor. (a) Sensitivity with different sensing area (size = 4 × 4 mm2, 6 × 6 mm2, and 8 × 8 mm2, respectively); (b) Capacitance–time curve for the detection of pressure (100 Pa) according to the loading and unloading of a little stone (0.7 g); (c) Bending stability of pressure response after 500-cycle bending test; (d) Multi-cycle tests of dynamic loading/unloading pressure with different values; (e) Fast response and relaxation time (<200 ms) of the sensor; (f) The curve of thermal drift of the sensor.
Figure 5(a) Digital image of the fingers on the surface of the pressure sensor to test the finger pressure-sensing capability; (b) Finger pressure distribution presented by capacitance variation of every detecting unit.