Literature DB >> 27983494

Sequence Analysis of Toxin Gene-Bearing Corynebacterium diphtheriae Strains, Australia.

Christine J Doyle, Adam Mazins, Rikki M A Graham, Ning-Xia Fang, Helen V Smith, Amy V Jennison.   

Abstract

By conducting a molecular characterization of Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains in Australia, we identified novel sequences, nonfunctional toxin genes, and 5 recent cases of toxigenic cutaneous diphtheria. These findings highlight the importance of extrapharyngeal infections for toxin gene-bearing (functional or not) and non-toxin gene-bearing C. diphtheriae strains. Continued surveillance is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corynebacterium diphtheriae; Corynebacterium infections; Diphtheria; bacteria; bacterial infections; diphtheria toxin; gram-positive bacterial infections; leg ulcer; skin diseases; wound infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27983494      PMCID: PMC5176206          DOI: 10.3201/eid2301.160584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Pharyngeal diphtheria caused by toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae is well-controlled in Australia due to a vaccine administered as part of the national immunization program. Rare cases of cutaneous and pharyngeal diphtheria have been reported in the country; however, the disease remains endemic in other regions of the world, and the potential for cases among travelers and their contacts remains (–). Historical data suggest that cutaneous diphtheria could be more contagious than respiratory diphtheria because environmental contamination from the skin is more common (). Detection of diphtheria toxin genes in either C. ulcerans or C. diphtheriae is notifiable in Queensland, regardless of the site of infection (). Extrapharyngeal disease, such as cutaneous infection or endocarditis, caused by either toxigenic or nontoxigenic strains can be clinically notable, however, and is not prevented by vaccination (). Our reference laboratory (Queensland Health Forensic and Scientific Services, Brisbane) receives isolates of C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans from clinical laboratories in Queensland and surrounding areas for toxin gene testing. PCR is used to test for the presence of the toxin gene, which encodes for both subunits of the AB exotoxin. However, the functionality of the gene is not routinely examined (,). Previous studies in the United Kingdom and Russia have reported nonsense mutations in the toxin gene; those strains are described as nontoxigenic toxin gene–bearing (NTTB) (,). We aimed to identify potential mutations in the toxin gene in a selection of isolates in Australia, as well as describe the recent epidemiology of C. diphtheriae isolations in the local area after the annual number of isolates referred to the laboratory had increased 10-fold from 2012 (n = 9) through 2015 (n = 108). During the 2-year period from July 1, 2013, until June 30, 2015, a total of 136 isolates of C. diphtheriae were referred to our laboratory for toxin gene screening; these isolates included 2 that were second isolations from patients, 2 and 3 months after the initial specimens were collected. Primary identification by diagnostic referring laboratories was confirmed by the presence of dtxR (). We did not determine patient vaccination status, biotype of isolates, presence of co-infecting organisms, and antimicrobial susceptibility and treatment as part of this study. Of the 136 isolates we received, 129 (95%) were from cutaneous wound swab specimens; 93 (72%) of 129 wounds were located on the lower limbs. Six isolates were respiratory system–associated, including 1 from the ear swab specimen of a patient with otitis media. Four isolates, including 1 nontoxigenic isolate from a blood culture, were from hospitalized patients, with the remainder presumed not to be. How this systemic case developed clinically is unknown. In most cases (71%), travel history or evidence on how the infection was acquired was not provided; however, when such information was given, tropical travel locations and injuries involving seawater or coral were typically noted. Isolates were collected from patients in both urban and rural areas. Five of the 136 isolates had both A and B subunits of diphtheria toxin (tox), detected by multiplex PCR, all of which appeared to be functional by sequence analysis (). These 5 isolates were obtained from lower limb wound specimens from patients with a history of travel in a tropical travel area. Whole-genome sequencing with the Ion Torrent platform (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) was performed on the 5 isolates with toxin genes detected by PCR and 1 historical isolate. We de novo assembled reads in Geneious R7 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand) and used Ridom Seqsphere+ (Ridom GmbH, G Würzburg, Germany) to extrapolate in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST) results and the sequences of diphtheria toxin repressor (dtxR) gene and tox genes. We also sequenced and analyzed the tox genes of an additional 8 historical C. diphtheriae isolates from our culture collection using methods described (,). MLST results for 3 historical isolates known to be related to each other were determined as described (). We analyzed a total of 14 tox-positive isolates (Table). All of those with MLST results had unique sequence types, except for the 3 known linked historical isolates. Novel sequences for dtxR and tox were submitted to GenBank (accession nos. KU869770–5). The novel dtxR sequences contained silent mutations and the novel frame-shift, missense, and/or nonsense mutations of the novel tox sequences. We predicted that 2 historical isolates would have nonfunctional tox genes, with single nucleotide deletions at positions 55 and 226 in fragment A, causing frame-shift mutations and premature stop codons at aa 38 and aa 92, respectively. These strains were isolated in 2006 or earlier and are considered to be NTTB strains. One of these strains has previously been reported as toxigenic; however, tox functionality was not assessed in that study by either sequence analysis or Elek testing ().
Table

Analysis of tox gene–positive Corynebacterium diphtheria isolates, Australia*

Strain no.GenBank accession no.
Predicted diphtheria
toxin peptide sequenceMLSTYear isolatedSitePatient travel historyClinical note
dtxR genetox gene
WM960461361Detected, NPKX702990CompleteNPUnknown (1996 or prior)UnknownUnknownHistorical isolate
WM960431373Detected, NPKX702991CompleteNPUnknown (1996 or prior)UnknownUnknownHistorical isolate
WM00M102Detected, NPKX702992CompleteNPUnknown (2000 or prior)UnknownUnknownHistorical isolate
WM00M103Detected, NPKX702993TruncatedNPUnknown (2000 or prior)UnknownUnknownHistorical isolate
2006M0083Detected, NPKX702994CompleteNP2005Lower limbIndonesiaCoral cut
2006M2336KU869770KU869773TruncatedST3792006Lower limbIndonesiaCoral cut
2011M2688Detected, NPKX702995CompleteST1252011ThroatNo travelContact of carrier
2011M2777Detected, NPKX702996CompleteST1252011ThroatPapua New GuineaCarrier
2011M2861Detected, NPKX702997CompleteST1252011ThroatNo travelContact of case
2013M7922KX702987KU869774CompleteST3812013Lower limbPapua New GuineaWound
2014M5840KU869772KX702998CompleteST2432014Lower limbCambodiaWound
2014M7492KX702988KX702999CompleteST3822014Lower limbIndonesiaSurf injury
2014M8143KX702989KU869775CompleteST1202014Lower limbUnknownCoral cut
2015M2871KU869771KX703000CompleteST3802015Lower limbSolomon IslandsWound

*MLST, multilocus sequence typing; NP, sequencing not performed.

*MLST, multilocus sequence typing; NP, sequencing not performed. The introduction of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry as a routine identification tool in clinical microbiology laboratories has likely been a factor responsible for the continued increase in referral of isolates to our laboratory in recent years, possibly in addition to increased awareness after the fatal case of respiratory diphtheria in Australia in 2011. The 5 recent cases of functional toxin gene–bearing cutaneous C. diphtheriae infection more likely reflect an increase in testing cutaneous isolates rather than a true increase in incidence. Extrapharyngeal infections, particularly cutaneous, with both toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains are more common in this geographic region than is classical pharyngeal diphtheria, and their incidence is likely to have been historically underestimated. Repeat isolates from the same patient months after previous isolation reflect the chronic nature of cutaneous infection. This observation is also supported by most patients receiving care through outpatient settings. Any difference in the severity of disease caused by strains included this study is unknown, although we presume that functional toxin gene–bearing strains cause more severe disease. Because of the theoretical possibility that NTTB stains and non–toxin gene–bearing strains could gain functional toxin expression by spontaneous mutation reversion or homologous recombination between different corynebacteriophages, these strains should be considered tox gene reservoirs (). These strains also can cause systemic infections, as the blood culture isolate included in this study demonstrates. The genetic variation among the 5 recent functional toxin gene–bearing isolates indicates the absence of a particular circulating clone in the area. We recommend continued surveillance of C. diphtheriae and identification of NTTB strains.
  10 in total

1.  Toxigenic cutaneous diphtheria in a returned traveller.

Authors:  Nur R Abdul Rahim; Ann P Koehler; Doug D Shaw; Caitlin R Graham
Journal:  Commun Dis Intell Q Rep       Date:  2014-12-31

2.  Development of a direct PCR assay for detection of the diphtheria toxin gene.

Authors:  H Nakao; T Popovic
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Corynebacterium diphtheriae and the returned tropical traveler.

Authors:  Meryta L A May; Rodney J McDougall; Jennifer M Robson
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 8.490

4.  Emergence and molecular characterisation of non-toxigenic tox gene-bearing Corynebacterium diphtheriae biovar mitis in the United Kingdom, 2003-2012.

Authors:  K Zakikhany; S Neal; A Efstratiou
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2014-06-05

5.  Multilocus sequence typing identifies evidence for recombination and two distinct lineages of Corynebacterium diphtheriae.

Authors:  Frances Bolt; Pamela Cassiday; Maria Lucia Tondella; Aruni Dezoysa; Androulla Efstratiou; Andreas Sing; Aleksandra Zasada; Kathryn Bernard; Nicole Guiso; Edgar Badell; Marie-Laure Rosso; Adam Baldwin; Christopher Dowson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Identification and molecular discrimination of toxigenic and nontoxigenic diphtheria Corynebacterium strains by combined real-time polymerase chain reaction assays.

Authors:  Fabiola Mancini; Monica Monaco; Marco Pataracchia; Christina von Hunolstein; Annalisa Pantosti; Alessandra Ciervo
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  The role of cutaneous diphtheria infections in a diphtheria epidemic.

Authors:  J S Koopman; J Campbell
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  A PCR for dtxR gene: application to diagnosis of non-toxigenic and toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae.

Authors:  Fabricia P Pimenta; Gisele A M Matias; Gabriela A Pereira; Thereza C F Camello; Gabriela B Alves; Ana C P Rosa; Raphael Hirata; Ana L Mattos-Guaraldi
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  [Corynebacterium diphtheriae nontoxigenic strain carrying the gene of diphtheria toxin].

Authors:  V G Mel'nikov; S Iu Kombarova; O Iu Borisova; N V Volozhantsev; V V Verevkin; K I Volkovoĭ; I K Mazurova
Journal:  Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

10.  The return of Corynebacterium diphtheriae: the rise of non-toxigenic strains.

Authors:  A P Wilson
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.926

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Whole-Genome Sequencing of Corynebacterium diphtheriae Isolates Recovered from an Inner-City Population Demonstrates the Predominance of a Single Molecular Strain.

Authors:  Samuel D Chorlton; Gordon Ritchie; Tanya Lawson; Marc G Romney; Christopher F Lowe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection and Characterization of Diphtheria Toxin Gene-Bearing Corynebacterium Species through a New Real-Time PCR Assay.

Authors:  Margaret M Williams; Jessica L Waller; Janessa S Aneke; Michael R Weigand; Maureen H Diaz; Katherine E Bowden; Ashley K Simon; Yanhui Peng; Lingzi Xiaoli; Pamela K Cassiday; Jonas Winchell; M Lucia Tondella
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Geographically Diverse Clusters of Nontoxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae Infection, Germany, 2016-2017.

Authors:  Alexandra Dangel; Anja Berger; Regina Konrad; Heribert Bischoff; Andreas Sing
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Genome-wide comparison of Corynebacterium diphtheriae isolates from Australia identifies differences in the Pan-genomes between respiratory and cutaneous strains.

Authors:  Verlaine J Timms; Trang Nguyen; Taryn Crighton; Marion Yuen; Vitali Sintchenko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Diphtheria Outbreaks in Schools in Central Highland Districts, Vietnam, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Noriko Kitamura; Thao T T Le; Lien T Le; Luong D Nguyen; Anh T Dao; Thanh T Hoang; Keisuke Yoshihara; Makiko Iijima; Tran M The; Hung M Do; Huy X Le; Hung T Do; Anh D Dang; Mai Q Vien; Lay-Myint Yoshida
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 6.883

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.