Literature DB >> 27982701

Dutch Adolescents' Motives, Perceptions, and Reflections Toward Sex-Related Internet Use: Results of a Web-Based Focus-Group Study.

Suzan M Doornwaard1, Fedde den Boer1, Ine Vanwesenbeeck1, Carol H C J van Nijnatten1, Tom F M Ter Bogt1, Regina J J M van den Eijnden1.   

Abstract

The Internet offers adolescents unique opportunities to actively shape their own sexual media environment. The aim of this study was to gain in-depth insight into Dutch adolescents' motives, perceptions, and reflections toward Internet use for (a) finding information or advice related to romance and sexuality; (b) searching for and viewing pornographic or erotic material; and (c) romantic and sexual communication (i.e., cybersex/sexting). Data were collected through 12 Web-based focus groups (36 adolescents aged 16 to 19 years, 72.2% girls) and analyzed through three stages of open, axial, and selective coding. The themes that emerged from the focus-group discussions suggest that sex-related Internet use is a complex and ambivalent experience for adolescents. Sex-related Internet use seems an increasingly normalized and common phenomenon. Participants perceived the Internet as a useful source of sexual information, stimulation, inspiration, and communication. Yet they discussed a range of negative consequences and risks related to sex-related online behaviors, particularly concerning pornography's potential to create unrealistic expectations about sex and sexual attractiveness. Participants generally believed they had the necessary skills to navigate through the online sexual landscape in a responsible way, although they believed other young people could be influenced inadvertently and adversely by sex-related online content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27982701     DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1255873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  8 in total

1.  Exposure to Sexually Explicit Materials and Feelings after Exposure among Adolescents in Nine European Countries: The Role of Individual Factors and Social Characteristics.

Authors:  Michaela Lebedíková; Vojtěch Mýlek; Kaveri Subrahmanyam; David Šmahel
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-08-29

2.  The pornography use and its addiction among emerging adults in Malaysia: Perceived realism as a mediator.

Authors:  Soon Aun Tan; Samantha Hui Li Ng; Juliana Ju Yun Hoo; Su Wan Gan; Sarvarubini Nainee; Chin Choo Yap; Ling Khai Lee; Norzarina Mohd Zaharim; Yee Shan Goh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Not all Online Sexual Activities Are the Same.

Authors:  Juan Ramón Barrada; Paula Ruiz-Gómez; Ana Belén Correa; Ángel Castro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26

4.  Computer-Mediated Communication to Facilitate Synchronous Online Focus Group Discussions: Feasibility Study for Qualitative HIV Research Among Transgender Women Across the United States.

Authors:  Andrea L Wirtz; Erin E Cooney; Aeysha Chaudhry; Sari L Reisner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Conducting Virtual, Synchronous Focus Groups Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Derek T Dangerfield Ii; Charleen Wylie; Janeane N Anderson
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2021-02-08

6.  Pornography Use Profiles and the Emergence of Sexual Behaviors in Adolescence.

Authors:  Davide Pirrone; Mariëlle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg; Ellen Reitz; Regina J J M van den Eijnden; Tom F M Ter Bogt
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-22

7.  Development of a Measure to Assess What Young Heterosexual Adults Say They Learn About Sex from Pornography.

Authors:  Kate Dawson; Saoirse Nic Gabhainn; Malachi Willis; Pádraig MacNeela
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-10

8.  Consensual Sexting among College Students: The Interplay of Coercion and Intimate Partner Aggression in Perceived Consequences of Sexting.

Authors:  Tara L Cornelius; Kathryn M Bell; Tylor Kistler; Michelle Drouin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.