Literature DB >> 27981608

Contrasting results from molecular and pedigree-based population diversity measures in captive zebra highlight challenges facing genetic management of zoo populations.

Hideyuki Ito1,2, Rob Ogden1,3, Tanya Langenhorst4, Miho Inoue-Murayama1,5.   

Abstract

Zoo conservation breeding programs manage the retention of population genetic diversity through analysis of pedigree records. The range of demographic and genetic indices determined through pedigree analysis programs allows the conservation of diversity to be monitored relative to the particular founder population for a species. Such approaches are based on a number of well-documented founder assumptions, however without knowledge of actual molecular genetic diversity there is a risk that pedigree-based measures will be misinterpreted and population genetic diversity misunderstood. We examined the genetic diversity of the captive populations of Grevy's zebra, Hartmann's mountain zebra and plains zebra in Japan and the United Kingdom through analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Very low nucleotide variability was observed in Grevy's zebra. The results were evaluated with respect to current and historic diversity in the wild, and indicate that low genetic diversity in the captive population is likely a result of low founder diversity, which in turn suggests relatively low wild genetic diversity prior to recent population declines. Comparison of molecular genetic diversity measures with analogous diversity indices generated from the studbook data for Grevy's zebra and Hartmann's mountain zebra show contrasting patterns, with Grevy's zebra displaying markedly less molecular diversity than mountain zebra, despite studbook analysis indicating that the Grevy's zebra population has substantially more founders, greater effective population size, lower mean kinship, and has suffered less loss of gene diversity. These findings emphasize the need to validate theoretical estimates of genetic diversity in captive breeding programs with empirical molecular genetic data. Zoo Biol. 36:87-94, 2017.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  captive breeding; genetic diversity; molecular genetic analysis; pedigree analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27981608     DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoo Biol        ISSN: 0733-3188            Impact factor:   1.421


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the Genetic Diversity of the Captive and Wild Populations of the Tsushima Leopard Cat Using a GRAS-Di Analysis.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ito; Nobuyoshi Nakajima; Manabu Onuma; Miho Inoue-Murayama
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Studbook and molecular analyses for the endangered black-lion-tamarin; an integrative approach for assessing genetic diversity and driving management in captivity.

Authors:  Paola Andrea Ayala-Burbano; Pedro Manoel Galetti Junior; Dominic Wormell; Alcides Pissinatti; Mara Cristina Marques; Patrícia Domingues de Freitas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  White-naped mangabeys' viable insurance population within European Zoo Network.

Authors:  Carlos Iglesias Pastrana; Francisco Javier Navas González; María Josefa Ruiz Aguilera; José Antonio Dávila García; Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo; María Teresa Abelló
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Genetic Diversity and Relatedness among Captive African Painted Dogs in North America.

Authors:  Cassandra M Miller-Butterworth; Karen Vacco; Amy L Russell; Joseph C Gaspard
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Factors affecting reproductive traits in male snow leopards (Unciauncia).

Authors:  Jason R Herrick; Cayla J Iske; Rachel M Santymire; Colleen Lynch; Mattina Alonge; Rebecca L Krisher; Cheryl L Morris
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2020-11-11

6.  Insights from the rescue and breeding management of Cuvier's gazelle (Gazella cuvieri) through whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Marina Alvarez-Estape; Claudia Fontsere; Aitor Serres-Armero; Lukas F K Kuderna; Pavel Dobrynin; Héla Guidara; Budhan S Pukazhenthi; Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Eulalia Moreno; Esther Lizano
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Comparison of divergent breeding management strategies in two species of semi-captive eland in Senegal.

Authors:  Anna Kubátová; Kateřina Štochlová; Karolína Brandlová; Pavla Jůnková Vymyslická; Barbora Černá Bolfíková
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.