Literature DB >> 27981565

A multicentre snapshot study of the incidence of serious procedural complications secondary to central venous catheterisation.

R K Lathey1, R E Jackson2, A Bodenham1, D Harper3, V Patle4.   

Abstract

Despite the high number of central venous access devices inserted annually, there are limited data on the incidence of the associated procedural complications, many of which carry substantial clinical risk. This point was highlighted in the recently published Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland 'Safe vascular access 2016' guidelines. This trainee-led snapshot study aimed to identify the number of central venous catheter insertions and the incidence of serious complications across multiple hospital sites within a fixed two-week period. Secondary aims were to identify the availability of resources and infrastructure to facilitate safe central venous catheter insertion and management of potential complications. Fifteen hospital sites participated, completing an initial resource survey and daily identification of all adult central venous catheter insertions, with subsequent review of any complications detected. A total of 487 central venous catheter insertions were identified, of which 15 (3.1%) were associated with a significant procedural complication. The most common complication was failure of insertion, which occurred in seven (1.4%) cases. Facilities to enable safer central venous catheter insertion and manage complications varied widely between hospitals, with little evidence of standardisation of guidelines or protocols.
© 2016 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Keywords:  central venous catheterisation; complications; vascular access

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27981565     DOI: 10.1111/anae.13774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  5 in total

1.  The provision of central venous access, transfer of critically ill patients and advanced airway management.: Are advanced critical care practitioners safe and effective?

Authors:  Gavin Denton; Lindsay Green; Marion Palmer; Anita Jones; Sarah Quinton; Simon Giles; Andrew Simmons; Andrew Choyce; Sean Munnelly; Daniel Higgins; Gavin D Perkins; Nitin Arora
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2018-10-01

2.  Coronary sinus catheter placement via left cubital vein for phrenic nerve stimulation during pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Akio Chikata; Takeshi Kato; Kazuo Usuda; Shuhei Fujita; Michiro Maruyama; Kan-Ichi Otowa; Shin-Ichiro Takashima; Hisayoshi Murai; Soichiro Usui; Hiroshi Furusho; Shuichi Kaneko; Masayuki Takamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  'It's learned on the job and it depends who you're with.' An observational qualitative study of how internal jugular cannulation is taught and learned.

Authors:  Clifford L Shelton; Maggie M Mort; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2017-09-06

4.  Central venous pressure monitoring in living donor kidney recipients does not affect immediate graft function: A propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Dieter Adelmann; Leonie Bicknell; Claus U Niemann; John Feiner; Garrett R Roll; Lyle Burdine; Elizabeth L Whitlock
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Insertion rates and complications of central lines in the UK population: A pilot study.

Authors:  Adrian Vk Wong; Nitin Arora; Olusegun Olusanya; Ben Sharif; Robert M Lundin; A Dhadda; S Clarke; R Siviter; M Argent; Gavin Denton; Anna Dennis; Angela Day; Tamas Szakmany
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2017-08-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.