| Literature DB >> 27981255 |
Sanaz Fathizadeh1, Reza Amani2, Mohammad Hossein Haghighizadeh3, Razieh Hormozi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is one of the important health problems with high incidence in young women. The exact cause of this syndrome is not clear and some theories have been declared from hormonal factors to nutritional disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Premenstrual syndrome; Serum zinc concentrations; Total antioxidant capacity; Young women
Year: 2016 PMID: 27981255 PMCID: PMC5153575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) ISSN: 2476-3772
Basic characteristics of the study group
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 24.17 ± 0.55 | 23.64 ± 0.60 | 0.52 |
| TAC ( mmol/L) | 0.81 ± 0.041 | 1.075 ± 0.06 | 0.00 |
| Serum zinc ( μg/dL) | 108.20 ± 3.73 | 153.8 ± 18.77 | 0.026 |
| BMR (Kcal) | 1297.16 ±20.01 | 1256.43 ±16.05 | 0.12 |
| PMS score | 33.91 ± 1.80 | 11.92 ± 1.11 | < 0.00 |
TAC: total antioxidant capacity
BMR: Basal metabolic rate
P<0.05;
P<0.001 PMS vs. healthy group, Independent t-test was used. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
Comparison of anthropometric indices between the study groups
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | 21.19 ± 0.61 | 22.90 ± 0.67 | 0.7 |
| Body fat percent (%) | 30.24 ± 1.27 | 34.29 ± 1.39 | 0.08 |
| Muscle mass (%) | 27.24 ± 0.50 | 25.58 ± 0.48 | 0.04 |
| Visceral fat (%) | 4.00 ±0.20 | 3.43 ±0.25 | 0.08 |
| Waist (cm) | 82.78 ±1.84 | 77.44 ±1.64 | 0.07 |
| Hip (cm) | 98.48 ±1.18 | 90.56 ± 0.98 | 0.06 |
BMI: Body mass index
P<0.05 PMS vs. healthy group, Independent t-test was used Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
Intake of selected food items as servings in study groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cakes | Daily | 1.07 ± 0.15 | 1.09 ± 0.16 | 0.9 |
| Snacks | Daily | 2.91 ± 0.90 | 2.19 ± 0.67 | 0.5 |
| Butter | Weekly | 0.90 ± 0.35 | 1.40 ± 0.40 | 0.4 |
| Fruits | Daily | 1.64 ± 0.16 | 1.10 ±0.15 | 0.2 |
| Fresh vegetables | Daily | 5.03 ± 0.85 | 5.03 ± 0.73 | 0.9 |
| Cooked vegetables | Daily | 2.47 ± 0.32 | 2.84 ± 0.44 | 0.5 |
| Soft drinks | Weekly | 3.51 ± 1.14 | 7.58± 1.99 | 0.09 |
| Eggs | Weekly | 3.22± 0.54 | 2.48 ± 0.47 | 0.3 |
| Red meats | Daily | 1.24± 0.16 | 1.79 ± 0.28 | 0.1 |
| Chicken | Daily | 2.35± 0.43 | 1.80 ± 0.22 | 0.3 |
| Fish | Monthly | 7.78 ± 2.06 | 5.90 ± 1.17 | 0.4 |
| Fats | Daily | 0.86 ± 0.24 | 0.40 ± 0.114 | 0.06 |
| Refined grains | Daily | 5.43 ± 2.85 | 4.40 ± 1.11 | 0.7 |
| Whole grains | Daily | 9.17± 0.93 | 8.90 ± 0.89 | 0.8 |
| Sweets/candies | Weekly | 3.88 ± 0.88 | 6.80 ± 1.36 | 0.7 |
| Sugars | Daily | 3.72 ± 1.35 | 4.00 ± 1.01 | 0.8 |
| ice creams | Weekly | 5.10 ± 1.37 | 3.70 ± 1.07 | 0.4 |
| Tea and coffee | Daily | 1.95 ± 0.193 | 1.70 ± 0.39 | 0.5 |
| Olive oils | Daily | 3.40 ± 1.2 | 3.70 ± 1.51 | 0.3 |
| Hydrogenated oils | Daily | 0.48 ± 0.28 | 2.37 ± 0.58 | 0.00 |
| Vegetables oils | Daily | 7.01 ± 0.61 | 8.01 ± 0.60 | 0.3 |
P<0.01 PMS vs. healthy group, Independent t-test was used
Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
Figure 1Correlation between PMS scores and serum total antioxidant capacity (µg/deciliter) in PMS patients (r=-0.39; p<0.05).
Figure 2Correlation between PMS scores and serum zinc concentrations (µg/deciliter) in PMS patients (r=-0.36; p<0.05).