Literature DB >> 27980840

Crystal structure of bis-(3,5-di-methyl-pyridine-κN)bis-(methanol-κO)bis-(thio-cyanato-κN)cobalt(II).

Stefan Suckert1, Inke Jess1, Christian Näther1.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title complex, [Co(NCS)2(C7H9N)2(CH3OH)2], comprises of one CoII cation located on a centre of inversion, one thio-cyanate ligand, one methanol ligand and one 3,5-di-methyl-pyridine ligand. The CoII cation is octa-hedrally coordinated by two terminal N-bonding thio-cyanate anions, two methanol mol-ecules and two 3,5-di-methyl-pyridine ligands into a discrete complex. The complex mol-ecules are linked by inter-molecular O-H⋯S hydrogen bonding into chains that elongate in the direction parallel to the b axis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3,5-di­methyl­pyridine ligand; cobalt(II) thio­cyanate complex; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding

Year:  2016        PMID: 27980840      PMCID: PMC5137618          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016018326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

For a long time, the synthesis of new mol­ecular magnetic materials with desired physical properties has been a topic of inter­est in coordination chemistry (Liu et al., 2015 ▸). To reach this goal, paramagnetic cations must be linked by small anionic ligands such as, for example, thio­cyanate anions that can mediate magnetic exchange between the cations (Palion-Gazda et al., 2015 ▸; Massoud et al., 2013 ▸). In this context, our group has already reported several thio­cyanato coordination polymers which – depending on the metal cation and the neutral co-ligand – show different magnetic phenomena including a slow relaxation of the magnetization (Werner et al., 2014 ▸, 2015a ▸,b ▸,c ▸). In this regard, discrete complexes are also of inter­est because a transformation into the desired polymeric compounds can be achieved through thermal decomposition, as shown in one of our previous studies (Näther et al., 2013 ▸). During our systematic work, compounds based on 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine as co-ligand should be prepared, for which only one thio­cyanato compound is known (Price & Stone, 1984 ▸; Nassimbeni et al., 1986 ▸). In the course of our investigations with CoII as the transition metal, crystals of the title compound, [Co(NCS)2(C7H9N)2(CH3OH)2], were obtained and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Unfortunately, no single-phase crystalline powder could be synthesized, which prevented further investigations of physical properties.

Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit of the title compound comprises of one CoII cation, one thio­cyanato anion, one methanol mol­ecule and one neutral 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine co-ligand. The CoII cation is located on a center of inversion; the thio­cyanate anion, the methanol mol­ecule as well as the 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine ligand are each located on general positions. The CoII cation is octa­hedrally coordinated by two terminal N-bonded thio­cyanato ligands, two methanol mol­ecules and two 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine ligands in an all-trans configuration (Fig. 1 ▸). The Co—N bond length to the thio­cyanate anion is significantly shorter [2.0898 (19) Å] than to the pyridine N atom of the 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine ligand [2.1602 (17) Å], which is in agreement with values reported in the literature (Goodgame et al., 2003 ▸; Wöhlert et al., 2014 ▸).
Figure 1

View of a discrete complex of the title compound, showing the atom labelling and anisotropic displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y + 1, −z + 1.]

Supra­molecular features

The discrete complexes in the crystal are linked by pairs of inter­molecular O—H⋯S hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl H atom of the methanol ligand and the thio­cyanato S atom of an adjacent complex into chains propagating parallel to the b axis (Fig. 2 ▸, Table 1 ▸). These pairs are located around centres of inversion.
Figure 2

The crystal structure of the title compound in a view along the a axis, showing the inter­molecular hydrogen bonding as dashed lines.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯S1i 0.842.453.2885 (17)175

Symmetry code: (i) .

Database survey

To the best of our knowledge, there is only one thio­cyanato coordination compound with 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine as a co-ligand deposited in the Cambridge Structure Database (Version 5.37, last update 2015; Groom et al., 2016 ▸). The structure consists of an NiII cation octa­hedrally coordinated by four 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine ligands and two N-bonded thio­cyanate anions (Price et al., 1984 ▸; Nassimbeni et al., 1986 ▸). A general search for coordination compounds with 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine resulted in 159 structures, including the aforementioned ones. Exemplary are two Co compounds: in the first, the cation is octa­hedrally coordinated by two 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine ligands as well as one μ-1,3-bridging and one μ-1,1-bridging azide anion, linking them into chains (Lu et al., 2012 ▸), whereas in the second compound, the CoII atom is octa­hedrally coordinated by four 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine ligands and two chloride anions, forming a discrete complex (Martone et al., 2007 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

Co(NCS)2 and 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Crystals of the title compound suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained by the reaction of 43.8 mg Co(NCS)2 (0.25 mmol) with 28.5 µl 3,5-di­methyl­pyridine (0.6 mmol) in methanol (1.5 ml) after a few days.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The C—H hydrogen atoms were positioned with idealized geometry and were refined with fixed isotropic displacement parameters U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) using a riding model. The O—H hydrogen atom was located in a difference map. For refinement, the bond length was constrained to 0.84 Å, with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O), using a riding model.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Co(NCS)2(C7H9N)2(CH4O)2]
M r 453.48
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P
Temperature (K)170
a, b, c (Å)7.7027 (5), 7.8688 (5), 9.1970 (5)
α, β, γ (°)87.403 (5), 81.419 (5), 76.295 (5)
V3)535.48 (6)
Z 1
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)1.02
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.09 × 0.04
 
Data collection
DiffractometerStoe IPDS2
Absorption correctionNumerical (X-SHAPE and X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2008)
T min, T max 0.885, 0.923
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections6258, 2431, 2052
R int 0.024
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.648
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.034, 0.094, 1.08
No. of reflections2431
No. of parameters127
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.37, −0.37

Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2008 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016018326/wm5338sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016018326/wm5338Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1517370 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Co(NCS)2(C7H9N)2(CH4O)2]Z = 1
Mr = 453.48F(000) = 237
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.406 Mg m3
a = 7.7027 (5) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 7.8688 (5) ÅCell parameters from 6258 reflections
c = 9.1970 (5) Åθ = 2.2–27.4°
α = 87.403 (5)°µ = 1.02 mm1
β = 81.419 (5)°T = 170 K
γ = 76.295 (5)°Block, blue
V = 535.48 (6) Å30.15 × 0.09 × 0.04 mm
Stoe IPDS-2 diffractometer2052 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω scansRint = 0.024
Absorption correction: numerical (X-SHAPE and X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2008)θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 2.2°
Tmin = 0.885, Tmax = 0.923h = −9→9
6258 measured reflectionsk = −10→10
2431 independent reflectionsl = −11→11
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.094w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0503P)2 + 0.2412P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2431 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.37 e Å3
127 parametersΔρmin = −0.37 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Co10.00000.50000.50000.02492 (13)
N10.1343 (3)0.6688 (3)0.3719 (2)0.0319 (4)
C10.2064 (3)0.7782 (3)0.3253 (2)0.0282 (4)
S10.30808 (9)0.93060 (7)0.25699 (6)0.03616 (16)
O10.2263 (2)0.2834 (2)0.45808 (19)0.0347 (4)
H10.24160.19170.40980.042*
C20.4115 (3)0.2961 (4)0.4380 (3)0.0406 (6)
H2A0.44550.33400.33700.061*
H2B0.48910.18160.45660.061*
H2C0.42610.38150.50690.061*
N110.1118 (3)0.5678 (2)0.68521 (19)0.0268 (4)
C110.1607 (3)0.4492 (3)0.7899 (2)0.0281 (4)
H110.15140.33270.77750.034*
C120.2242 (3)0.4871 (3)0.9156 (2)0.0282 (4)
C130.2358 (3)0.6584 (3)0.9313 (2)0.0291 (4)
H130.27800.69001.01580.035*
C140.1865 (3)0.7841 (3)0.8251 (2)0.0287 (4)
C150.1263 (3)0.7319 (3)0.7033 (2)0.0272 (4)
H150.09370.81650.62910.033*
C160.2780 (3)0.3476 (3)1.0281 (2)0.0343 (5)
H16A0.38820.26400.98670.051*
H16B0.18070.28641.05540.051*
H16C0.30010.40141.11550.051*
C170.1983 (4)0.9710 (3)0.8375 (3)0.0374 (5)
H17A0.21791.02180.73880.056*
H17B0.29910.97470.88990.056*
H17C0.08551.03820.89170.056*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Co10.0324 (2)0.0230 (2)0.0224 (2)−0.01104 (16)−0.00600 (15)−0.00096 (14)
N10.0419 (11)0.0315 (9)0.0264 (9)−0.0160 (8)−0.0056 (8)0.0007 (7)
C10.0330 (11)0.0299 (10)0.0226 (9)−0.0070 (9)−0.0062 (8)−0.0034 (8)
S10.0456 (4)0.0304 (3)0.0358 (3)−0.0184 (3)−0.0004 (3)−0.0018 (2)
O10.0328 (9)0.0303 (8)0.0428 (9)−0.0089 (7)−0.0054 (7)−0.0103 (7)
C20.0308 (12)0.0427 (13)0.0512 (14)−0.0114 (10)−0.0092 (10)−0.0056 (11)
N110.0334 (10)0.0255 (9)0.0240 (8)−0.0101 (7)−0.0064 (7)−0.0018 (7)
C110.0367 (12)0.0226 (10)0.0278 (10)−0.0104 (9)−0.0071 (8)−0.0014 (8)
C120.0304 (11)0.0300 (11)0.0252 (10)−0.0089 (9)−0.0037 (8)−0.0014 (8)
C130.0320 (11)0.0314 (11)0.0261 (10)−0.0098 (9)−0.0051 (8)−0.0059 (8)
C140.0322 (11)0.0260 (10)0.0292 (10)−0.0096 (9)−0.0027 (8)−0.0045 (8)
C150.0323 (11)0.0249 (10)0.0261 (10)−0.0091 (8)−0.0051 (8)−0.0008 (8)
C160.0418 (13)0.0339 (12)0.0299 (11)−0.0110 (10)−0.0114 (9)0.0027 (9)
C170.0480 (14)0.0283 (11)0.0410 (13)−0.0161 (10)−0.0097 (11)−0.0050 (9)
Co1—N12.0898 (19)C11—C121.390 (3)
Co1—N1i2.0898 (19)C11—H110.9500
Co1—O1i2.1311 (16)C12—C131.388 (3)
Co1—O12.1311 (16)C12—C161.502 (3)
Co1—N11i2.1602 (17)C13—C141.386 (3)
Co1—N112.1602 (17)C13—H130.9500
N1—C11.164 (3)C14—C151.388 (3)
C1—S11.636 (2)C14—C171.505 (3)
O1—C21.438 (3)C15—H150.9500
O1—H10.8399C16—H16A0.9800
C2—H2A0.9800C16—H16B0.9800
C2—H2B0.9800C16—H16C0.9800
C2—H2C0.9800C17—H17A0.9800
N11—C111.342 (3)C17—H17B0.9800
N11—C151.342 (3)C17—H17C0.9800
N1—Co1—N1i180.0C15—N11—Co1121.16 (14)
N1—Co1—O1i87.76 (7)N11—C11—C12123.78 (19)
N1i—Co1—O1i92.24 (7)N11—C11—H11118.1
N1—Co1—O192.24 (7)C12—C11—H11118.1
N1i—Co1—O187.76 (7)C13—C12—C11116.89 (19)
O1i—Co1—O1180.0C13—C12—C16122.06 (19)
N1—Co1—N11i92.30 (7)C11—C12—C16121.05 (19)
N1i—Co1—N11i87.70 (7)C14—C13—C12120.79 (19)
O1i—Co1—N11i89.25 (6)C14—C13—H13119.6
O1—Co1—N11i90.75 (6)C12—C13—H13119.6
N1—Co1—N1187.70 (7)C13—C14—C15117.59 (19)
N1i—Co1—N1192.30 (7)C13—C14—C17122.42 (19)
O1i—Co1—N1190.75 (6)C15—C14—C17120.0 (2)
O1—Co1—N1189.25 (6)N11—C15—C14123.23 (19)
N11i—Co1—N11180.0N11—C15—H15118.4
C1—N1—Co1167.28 (17)C14—C15—H15118.4
N1—C1—S1179.04 (19)C12—C16—H16A109.5
C2—O1—Co1124.49 (14)C12—C16—H16B109.5
C2—O1—H197.4H16A—C16—H16B109.5
Co1—O1—H1131.5C12—C16—H16C109.5
O1—C2—H2A109.5H16A—C16—H16C109.5
O1—C2—H2B109.5H16B—C16—H16C109.5
H2A—C2—H2B109.5C14—C17—H17A109.5
O1—C2—H2C109.5C14—C17—H17B109.5
H2A—C2—H2C109.5H17A—C17—H17B109.5
H2B—C2—H2C109.5C14—C17—H17C109.5
C11—N11—C15117.71 (17)H17A—C17—H17C109.5
C11—N11—Co1121.05 (13)H17B—C17—H17C109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···S1ii0.842.453.2885 (17)175
  8 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Thermodynamically metastable thiocyanato coordination polymer that shows slow relaxations of the magnetization.

Authors:  Julia Werner; Michał Rams; Zbigniew Tomkowicz; Tomče Runčevski; Robert E Dinnebier; Stefan Suckert; Christian Näther
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Synthesis, structure and properties of [Co(NCS)2(4-(4-chlorobenzyl)pyridine)2]n, that shows slow magnetic relaxations and a metamagnetic transition.

Authors:  Julia Werner; Zbigniew Tomkowicz; Michał Rams; Stefan G Ebbinghaus; Tristan Neumann; Christian Näther
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  A Co(II) thiocyanato coordination polymer with 4-(3-phenylpropyl)pyridine: the influence of the co-ligand on the magnetic properties.

Authors:  Julia Werner; Michał Rams; Zbigniew Tomkowicz; Christian Näther
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 4.390

5.  Influence of the co-ligand on the magnetic and relaxation properties of layered cobalt(II) thiocyanato coordination polymers.

Authors:  Susanne Wöhlert; Zbigniew Tomkowicz; Michał Rams; Stefan G Ebbinghaus; Lothar Fink; Martin U Schmidt; Christian Näther
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.165

6.  trans-Dichloridotetrakis(3,5-dimethylpyridine)copper(II).

Authors:  Daniel P Martone; Andrew W Maverick; Frank R Fronczek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

8.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.