Crystal structure of catena-poly[di-ammonium [di-μ-oxalato-cuprate(II)]].

The structure of the title compound, {(NH4)2[Cu(C2O4)2]} n , at 100 K has monoclinic (P21/c) symmetry with the CuII atom on an inversion center. The compound has a polymeric structure due to long Cu⋯O inter-actions which create [Cu(C2O4)2] chains along the a axis. The structure also displays inter-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bonding, which links these chains into a three-dimensional network.

Chemical context

Metal oxalate salts are ubiquitous in nature (Baran, 2014 ▸) and are also of great inter­est to synthetic chemists and materials scientists because they often display unusual magnetic and conductive properties (Nenwa et al., 2015 ▸; Robinson et al., 2015 ▸; Zhang et al., 2012 ▸; Clemente-León et al., 2011 ▸; Gruselle et al., 2006 ▸). Other areas of study for metal oxalates include, but are not limited to, metallogels (Feldner et al., 2016 ▸), coordination polymers and networks (Guo et al., 2016 ▸; Mizzi & LaDuca, 2016 ▸; Yeşilel et al., 2010 ▸), and precursors for nanomaterials and metallic inks (Yadav et al., 2013 ▸; Cheng et al., 2016 ▸). The properties of metal oxalates are often tuned by using a combination of different cations. These may be simply metal cations, but often they are more complex, such as quaternary nitro­gen cations. Surprisingly, the structure of the simplest of the (NR 4)2[Cu(C2O4)2] family, (NH4)2[Cu(C2O4)2], has not previously been reported.

Structural commentary

The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c with the copper atom on an inversion center (Fig. 1 ▸). As is true for all but one copper oxalate complex (Gu & Xue, 2007 ▸) found in the CSD (Version 5.37, May 2016 update; Groom et al., 2016 ▸), the copper atom is chelated by oxygen atoms from the adjacent carbon atoms to form a five membered ring, rather than oxygen atoms from the same carbon. The coordination environment of copper is nearly perfectly square planar, with the O1—Cu1—O2 bond angle measuring 85.44 (3)° within the asymmetric unit, and 94.56 (3)° across the inversion center. Within the plane of the oxalate ligand, O1 and O2 form bonds to Cu1 measuring 1.9326 (7) and 1.9301 (7) Å, respectively. O3 inter­acts weakly, at a distance of 2.7057 (8) Å, with the symmetry-related Cu atoms above and below the ligand plane, giving an elongated octa­hedron. O4 has no bonding inter­actions with Cu, but does engage in hydrogen bonding with the ammonium cation (see below). The different ways that the oxygen atoms do or do not inter­act with copper is reflected in the C—O bonds. The two oxygen atoms that are strongly bound to copper, O1 and O2, have slightly longer bonds to carbon of 1.2798 (11) and 1.2895 (12) Å for C1—O1 and C2—O2, respectively. The weakly inter­acting O3 and non-bonded O4 have shorter C—O bonds of 1.2355 (12) and 1.2249 (12) Å for C1—O3 and C2—O4, respectively.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, with non-H atoms shown as displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features

As noted above, the coordination sphere of the copper atoms is completed by a long inter­action of 2.7057 (8) Å between O3 and Cu1 in the planes above and below the ligand, giving rise to polymeric copper oxalate chains along the a axis (Fig. 2 ▸). These chains do not inter­act directly with one another. Instead, they are linked into a three-dimensional network by partly bifurcated N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Fig. 3 ▸) between all four protons of the ammonium cation and the oxalate oxygen atoms indicated by the symmetry operations in Table 1 ▸.

Figure 2

A single chain of the copper oxalate complex with the ammonium cation omitted.

Figure 3

Packing viewed along the a axis, showing the polymeric complex formed by hydrogen bonding between the ammonium cations and oxalate ligands.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O1i	0.824 (17)	2.230 (17)	2.8667 (11)	134.2 (16)
N1—H1⋯O4ii	0.824 (17)	2.475 (17)	3.0503 (12)	127.8 (15)
N1—H2⋯O2iii	0.865 (18)	1.991 (18)	2.8507 (11)	172.5 (16)
N1—H3⋯O3iv	0.854 (19)	2.053 (19)	2.8884 (11)	165.7 (17)
N1—H4⋯O3	0.85 (2)	2.43 (2)	3.0015 (11)	124.7 (16)
N1—H4⋯O4	0.85 (2)	2.04 (2)	2.8330 (12)	155.1 (18)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

Database survey

There are three published reports of hydrated ammonium copper oxalate but to the best of our knowledge, the anhydrous title compound has not been reported previously. The earliest report, for (NH4)4[Cu2(C2O4)4(H2O)2]·2nH2O (Viswamitra, 1962 ▸) was re­inter­preted (Novosad et al., 2000 ▸) as a polymeric complex with the repeat unit consisting of two [Cu(C2O4)2] moieties. One copper atom forms long Cu—O bonds to the next unit, similar to the way in which the title compound forms its chains, while the other is capped by two water mol­ecules. A different hydrate, (NH4)8[Cu4(C2O4)8(H2O)2·4H2O, has also been reported (Kadir et al., 2006 ▸), but it does not feature chains of polymeric copper oxalate. Instead, it exists as a discrete water-capped tetra­mer. In each case, these hydrates also display hydrogen bonding between the oxalate, ammonium and water molecules. Besides the simple hydrates, structures of ammonium copper oxalates with polyoxidometalates based on tungsten (Reinoso et al., 2005 ▸, 2007 ▸) or molybdenum (Li et al., 2011 ▸) have been reported.

Synthesis and crystallization

A solution of bis­(diiso­propyl­phosphan­yl)amine (0.25 g, 1.0 mmol) in 1 mL MeOH was added to a slurry of copper(II) oxalate hemihydrate (0.15 g, 1.0 mmol) in 1 mL MeOH. The mixture was heated to reflux for 5 min and then allowed to cool to room temperature. After three days, the blue supernatant solution was deca­nted from an insoluble powder and cooled to 248 K. Block-like blue crystals of the title compound were isolated after six weeks. The mechanism by which bis(diiso­propyl­phosphan­yl)amine decomposes into ammonium is under investigation.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸.

Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	(NH4)2[Cu(C2O4)2]
M r	275.66
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)	100
a, b, c (Å)	4.8564 (2), 13.5188 (5), 6.7205 (3)
β (°)	96.992 (2)
V (Å3)	437.94 (3)
Z	2
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm−1)	2.53
Crystal size (mm)	0.43 × 0.28 × 0.28
Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015 ▸)
T min, T max	0.41, 0.54
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	8277, 1672, 1537
R int	0.017
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)	0.769
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S	0.018, 0.051, 1.08
No. of reflections	1672
No. of parameters	86
H-atom treatment	All H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)	0.37, −0.51

Computer programs: BIS and SAINT (Bruker, 2015 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016017631/pj2038sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016017631/pj2038Isup2.hkl

Click here for additional data file.

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016017631/pj2038Isup3.cdx

CCDC reference: 1515161

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

2(H4N+)·C4CuO82−	F(000) = 278
Mr = 275.66	Dx = 2.090 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/c	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.8564 (2) Å	Cell parameters from 5449 reflections
b = 13.5188 (5) Å	θ = 3.0–33.1°
c = 6.7205 (3) Å	µ = 2.53 mm−1
β = 96.992 (2)°	T = 100 K
V = 437.94 (3) Å3	Block, blue
Z = 2	0.43 × 0.28 × 0.28 mm

Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer	1672 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus tube	1537 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	Rint = 0.017
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1	θmax = 33.2°, θmin = 3.0°
φ and ω scans	h = −7→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015)	k = −20→18
Tmin = 0.41, Tmax = 0.54	l = −9→10
8277 measured reflections

Refinement on F2	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018	All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.051	w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0263P)2 + 0.1971P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08	(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1672 reflections	Δρmax = 0.37 e Å−3
86 parameters	Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3
0 restraints

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

	x	y	z	Uiso*/Ueq
Cu1	0	0.5	0	0.00661 (5)
O1	0.32614 (14)	0.44779 (5)	0.15885 (10)	0.00795 (12)
O2	0.15437 (14)	0.62834 (5)	0.07337 (11)	0.00968 (13)
O3	0.72392 (16)	0.50253 (5)	0.32622 (12)	0.01101 (14)
O4	0.52948 (15)	0.69388 (5)	0.25066 (12)	0.01245 (14)
C1	0.4930 (2)	0.51573 (7)	0.23064 (14)	0.00716 (15)
C2	0.39072 (19)	0.62308 (7)	0.18343 (14)	0.00800 (15)
N1	0.95132 (18)	0.67395 (6)	0.57854 (13)	0.00966 (14)
H1	0.840 (3)	0.6723 (13)	0.662 (3)	0.020 (4)*
H2	1.027 (3)	0.7319 (13)	0.582 (3)	0.019 (4)*
H3	1.072 (4)	0.6285 (14)	0.607 (3)	0.023 (4)*
H4	0.849 (4)	0.6643 (14)	0.468 (3)	0.029 (5)*

	U11	U22	U33	U12	U13	U23
Cu1	0.00454 (8)	0.00426 (8)	0.01054 (8)	−0.00002 (5)	−0.00113 (5)	0.00048 (5)
O1	0.0065 (3)	0.0063 (3)	0.0106 (3)	0.0002 (2)	−0.0011 (2)	0.0008 (2)
O2	0.0068 (3)	0.0060 (3)	0.0153 (3)	0.0005 (2)	−0.0026 (2)	−0.0002 (2)
O3	0.0084 (3)	0.0099 (3)	0.0136 (3)	0.0011 (2)	−0.0033 (2)	−0.0005 (2)
O4	0.0125 (3)	0.0075 (3)	0.0160 (3)	−0.0016 (2)	−0.0035 (2)	−0.0014 (2)
C1	0.0071 (3)	0.0064 (3)	0.0081 (3)	0.0007 (3)	0.0013 (3)	0.0003 (3)
C2	0.0074 (3)	0.0070 (4)	0.0094 (3)	0.0009 (3)	0.0005 (3)	0.0000 (3)
N1	0.0100 (3)	0.0075 (3)	0.0110 (3)	−0.0017 (3)	−0.0007 (3)	0.0004 (3)

Cu1—O2i	1.9301 (7)	O4—C2	1.2249 (12)
Cu1—O2	1.9301 (7)	C1—C2	1.5541 (13)
Cu1—O1i	1.9326 (7)	N1—H1	0.824 (17)
Cu1—O1	1.9326 (7)	N1—H2	0.865 (18)
O1—C1	1.2798 (11)	N1—H3	0.854 (19)
O2—C2	1.2895 (12)	N1—H4	0.85 (2)
O3—C1	1.2355 (12)
O2i—Cu1—O2	180.00 (4)	O1—C1—C2	114.91 (8)
O2i—Cu1—O1i	85.44 (3)	O4—C2—O2	125.44 (9)
O2—Cu1—O1i	94.56 (3)	O4—C2—C1	120.44 (8)
O2i—Cu1—O1	94.57 (3)	O2—C2—C1	114.12 (8)
O2—Cu1—O1	85.43 (3)	H1—N1—H2	108.8 (16)
O1i—Cu1—O1	180.0	H1—N1—H3	108.4 (16)
C1—O1—Cu1	112.64 (6)	H2—N1—H3	111.5 (16)
C2—O2—Cu1	112.83 (6)	H1—N1—H4	103.3 (16)
O3—C1—O1	125.83 (9)	H2—N1—H4	111.1 (16)
O3—C1—C2	119.23 (8)	H3—N1—H4	113.3 (17)
Cu1—O1—C1—O3	−175.08 (8)	O3—C1—C2—O4	−4.51 (14)
Cu1—O1—C1—C2	2.83 (9)	O1—C1—C2—O4	177.43 (9)
Cu1—O2—C2—O4	−179.39 (8)	O3—C1—C2—O2	176.24 (9)
Cu1—O2—C2—C1	−0.18 (10)	O1—C1—C2—O2	−1.82 (12)

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N1—H1···O1ii	0.824 (17)	2.230 (17)	2.8667 (11)	134.2 (16)
N1—H1···O4iii	0.824 (17)	2.475 (17)	3.0503 (12)	127.8 (15)
N1—H2···O2iv	0.865 (18)	1.991 (18)	2.8507 (11)	172.5 (16)
N1—H3···O3v	0.854 (19)	2.053 (19)	2.8884 (11)	165.7 (17)
N1—H4···O3	0.85 (2)	2.43 (2)	3.0015 (11)	124.7 (16)
N1—H4···O4	0.85 (2)	2.04 (2)	2.8330 (12)	155.1 (18)