| Literature DB >> 27980699 |
Abstract
Umu test have been widely used to predict the detection and assessment of DNA- damaging chemicals in environmental genotoxicity field for three decades. This test system is more useful with respect to simplicity, sensitivity, rapidity, and reproducibility. A review of the literature on the development of the umu test is presented in this article. The contents of this article are included a description of numerous data using the umu test. This test have been fully evaluated and used in many directions. Different genetically engineered umu systems introducing bacterial and rat or human drug metabolizing enzymes into the umu tester strains, have been successfully established and are considered as useful tools for genotoxicity assays to study the mechanisms of biotransformation in chemical carcinogenesis. Actually, we developed that two types of bacterial metabolizing enzymes and 4 types of rat and human metabolizing enzyme DNAs are expressed in these strains such as nitroreductase and O-acetyltransferase, cytochrome P450, N-acetyltransferases, sulfotransferases, and glutathione S-transferases, respectively. Due to increasing numbers of minute environmental samples and new pharmaceuticals, a high-throughput umu test system using Salmonella typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002, NM2009, and NM3009 strains provides a useful for these genotoxicity screening. I also briefly describe the first attempts to incorporate such umu tester strain into photo-genotoxicity test.Entities:
Keywords: Cytochrome P450; Genotoxicity; Glutathione S-transferase; Metabolic activation; O-acetyltransferase; SOS response; Sulfotransferase; umu test
Year: 2016 PMID: 27980699 PMCID: PMC5131509 DOI: 10.1186/s41021-016-0054-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Environ ISSN: 1880-7046
Fig. 1Schema showing the principle of umu test using umuC”lacZ fusion gene. In uninduced cells, the LexA repressor protein, acts to repress by binding to operator sequences (called an SOS box) upstream from umu operon. On the other hand, in induced cells: when the DNA is damaged by genotoxins, or when replication is blocked by various ways, the cell induces an SOS signal. The SOS signal activates a coprotease activity of the RecA protein, and this protease (RecA filaments) activate the autocleavage of the LexA repressor, allowing umuC” lacZ fusion gene expression, and the chimeric UmuC”LacZ fused protein is produced. Since the umuC gene is fused with the lacZ gene for β-galactosidase activity, the induction of umuC gene can be estimated by determination of the β-galactosidase activity
Comparison of umu test results and chemicals tested for rodent carcinogenicity [22]
| Carcinogenicity |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | — | ± | Total | |
| + | 119 | 72 | 2 | 193 |
| — | 11 | 39 | 0 | 50 |
| ± | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 130 | 116 | 2 | 248 |
| Sensitivity | 65 % | (119/193) | ||
| Specificity | 78 % | (39/50) | ||
| Accuracy | 65 % | (158/243) | ||
Standard methods for the determination of the genotoxicity of water and wastewater using umu test
| Year | Description | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | An official method of the water supply test method | Japan |
| 1995 | A standard method of the genotoxicity of water and wastewater (DIN 38415T3) [ | Germany |
| 1997 | An official method of the wastewater test method | Japan |
| 2000 | A genotoxicity test of water and wastewater in International standardization Organization (ISO) Standards (ISO/CD 13829) [ | ISO |
| 2008 | A standard method of the genotoxicity of water and wastewater (MS ISO13829) | Malaysia |
Establishment of umu tester strains overexpressing bacterial and mammalian metabolic enzymes
|
| Character | Detection | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NM1011 | Nitroreductase-overexpressing | Nitroarenes | [ |
| NM2009 |
| Arylamines | [ |
| NM3009 | Nitroreductase- and | Nitroarenes, Arylamines | [ |
| OY1002/1A1 | Human P4501A1 and NPR, and | PAH, Arylamines | [ |
| OY1002/1A2 | Human P4501A2 and NPR, and | Arylamines | [ |
| OY1002/1B1 | Human P4501B1 and NPR, and | PAH, Arylamines | [ |
| OY1002/2C9 | Human P4502C9 and NPR, and | [ | |
| OY1002/2D6 | Human P4502D6 and NPR, and | [ | |
| OY1002/2E1 | Human P4502E1 and NPR, and | Nitrosoamines | [ |
| OY1002/3A4 | Human P4503A4 and NPR, and | Aflatoxins | [ |
| NM6001 | Human | Arylamines, Nitroarenes | [ |
| NM6002 | Human | Arylamines, Nitroarenes | [ |
| NM7001 | Human sulfotransferase 1A1 overexpressing | Arylamines Benzylic alcohols | [ |
| NM7002 | Human sulfotransferase 1A2 overexpressing | Arylamines | [ |
| NM7003 | Human sulfotransferase 1A3 overexpressing | Alkenylbenzenes | [ |
| NM5004 | Rat glutathione | Dihaloalkenes | [ |
NPR, NADPH-P450 reductase; O-AT, O-acetyltransferase; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
Comparison of the sensitivity of NM2009, NM3009, and TA1535/pSK1002 strains to nitroarenes and arylamines [7, 36]
| Chemicals | S9 | TA1535/pSK1002 | NM2009 | NM3009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimal concentration (ng/ml)a | ||||
| 1-nitropyrene | − | 13 | ND | 0.2 |
| 3-nitrofluoranthene | − | 10 | ND | 0.08 |
| 1,3-dinitropyrene | − | 0.4 | ND | 0.1 |
| 1,6-dinitropyrene | − | 1.4 | ND | 0.04 |
| 3,7-dinitrofluoranthene | − | 1.2 | ND | 0.05 |
| 3,9-dinitrofluoranthene | − | 1.8 | ND | 0.06 |
| 2-aminoanthracene | + | 8,400 | 400 | ND |
| 6-aminochrysene | + | 200 | 260 | ND |
| Glu-P-1 | + | 100 | 80 | ND |
| Trp-P-1 | + | 80 | 6 | ND |
| MeAαC | + | 800 | 180 | ND |
| MeIQ | + | 1 | 0.009 | ND |
aThe concentration of chemicals that induced umuC gene expression by twofold over background levels
ND, not determined
Fig. 2Pathway from metabolic activation to mutagenesis. P450, cytochrome P450; NR, nitroreductase; NAT, N-acetyltransferase; SULT, sulfotransferase, GST glutathione S-transferase
Comparison of genotoxicity activities of various chemicals in S. typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002 and NM5004 strains a [9, 60]
| Chemicals | NM5004 [GST(+)] | TA1535/pSK1002 [GST(−)] |
|---|---|---|
| 1,2-dibromoethane | +++ | − |
|
| +++ | + |
| 1,3-dichloroacetone | ++ | + |
| CH2I2 | ++ | − |
| 1,2-epoxy-3-phenoxypropane | + | − |
| 2,3-epoxypropyl | + | − |
| 1-bromo-2-chloroethane | + | − |
| 1-bromo-2,3-dichloropropane | + | − |
| CH2BrCl | + | − |
| CH2Br2 | + | − |
| 1,2-epoxy-3-(4′-nitrophenoxy)-propane | − | ++ |
| 2,3-dibromo-1-chloropropane | ± | + |
| 1,4-dibromo-2,3-epoxybutane | + | ++ |
| 1,2-epoxy-3-bromopropane | − | + |
| 1,2-epoxy-3-chloropropane | − | ± |
| 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane | + | + |
| 2,3-dibromopropionaldehyde | + | + |
| 1,4-dibromo-2,3-dihydroxybutane | ± | − |
| 1,4-dibromobutane | − | − |
| 1,3-dibromoacetone | + | + |
| 2,3-dibromo-1-propanol | ± | ± |
| 1,2-epoxy-4-bromobutane | ± | ± |
| CH2Cl2 | ++ | − |
| 1,3-dibromo-2-propanol | − | − |
| 1-bromo-2,3-propanediol | − | − |
| 4-vinylcyclohexene dioxide | − | − |
| eyclohexene oxide | − | − |
| 1,2-epoxybutane | − | − |
| 1-bromo-2-fluoroethane | − | − |
a Potencies of chemicals in umu systems were ranked as follows: (−) 0–50; (±) 50–100; (+) 100–250; (++) 250–450; (+++) 450 for umu gene expression (units)
Comparison of substrate specificity of human sulfotransferases expressed in S. typhimurium TA1538/1,8-DNP/pSK1002 towards a variety of chemicals [11]
| Chemicals | S9 | SULT isoforms |
|---|---|---|
| Arylamines | ||
| 2-Aminoanthracene | + | 1A1 = 1A2 |
| 2-Aminofluorene | + | 1A2 |
| 2-Acetylaminofluorene | + | 1A1 < 1A2 |
| 4-Aminobiphenyl | + | 1A1 = 1A2 |
| 6-Aminochrysene | + | SR |
| Aminophenylnorharman | + | 1A1 < 1A2 |
| AαC | + | 1A3 = 1A2 < 1A1 |
| Glu-P-1 | + | 1A1 |
| IQ | + | SR |
| MeAαC | + | 1A2 < 1A1 |
| MeIQ | + | SR |
| 3-MeO-AAB | + | 1A1 = 1A2 |
| β-Naphthylamine | + | 1A3 < 1A2 = 1A1 |
| PhIP | + | 1A1 < 1A2 |
| Trp-P-1 | + | SR |
| Trp-P-2 | + | SR |
| Nitroarenes | ||
| Furylfuramide | − | 1A2 |
| 5-Nitroacenaphthene | − | 1A1 |
| 3-Nitrobenzanthrone | − | 1A2 < 1A1 |
| 2-Nitrofluorene | − | 1A2 |
| Nitrofurazone | − | SR |
| 3-Nitrofluoranthene | − | 1A1 |
| 1-Nitronaphthalene | − | SR |
| 1-Nitropyrene | − | 1A2 |
| 2-Nitropropane | − | 1A2 |
| 4-Nitroquinoline 1-oxide | − | SR |
| 2-Nitrotriphenylene | − | SR |
| 4,4′-Dinitrobiphenyl | − | 1A1 = 1A2 |
| 3,7-Dinitrofluoranthene | − | 1A2 < 1A1 |
| 3,9-Dinitrofluoranthene | − | 1A2 < 1A1 |
| 1,6-Dinitropyrene | − | SR |
| Benzylic and allylic alcohols | ||
| Estragole | + | 1A3 |
| Hycanthone | − | 1A1 = 1A3 |
| 1′-Hydoxysafrole | − | 1A3 |
| 1-Hydroxymethylpyrene | − | 1A3 < 1A2 < 1A1 |
SR presents same response in all strains
AαC, 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole; Glu-P-1, 2-amino-6-methyl-dipyrido[1,2-α:3′,2′-d]imidazole; IQ, 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline; MeAαC, 2-amino-3-methyl9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole; MeIQ, 2-amino-3,5-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline; 3-MeO-AAB, 3-methoxy-4-aminoazobenzene; PhIP, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine; Trp-P-1, 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole; Trp-P-2, 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole