Mesoporous silica nanoparticles functionalized with folic acid/methionine for active targeted delivery of docetaxel.

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) are known as carriers with high loading capacity and large functionalizable surface area for target-directed delivery. In this study, a series of docetaxel-loaded folic acid- or methionine-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (DTX/MSN-FA or DTX/MSN-Met) with large pores and amine groups at inner pore surface properties were prepared. The results showed that the MSNs were successfully synthesized, having good pay load and pH-sensitive drug release kinetics. The cellular investigation on MCF-7 cells showed better performance of cytotoxicity and cell apoptosis and an increase in cellular uptake of targeted nanoparticles. In vivo fluorescent imaging on healthy BALB/c mice proved that bare MSN-NH2 are mostly accumulated in the liver but MSN-FA or MSN-Met are more concentrated in the kidney. Importantly, ex vivo fluorescent images of tumor-induced BALB/c mice organs revealed the ability of MSN-FA to reach the tumor tissues. In conclusion, DTX/MSNs exhibited a good anticancer activity and enhanced the possibility of targeted drug delivery for breast cancer.

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers among women, and its frequency has been shown to increase continuously.1,2 Although conventional chemotherapy methods could eliminate the majority of breast cancer cells, they are not always adequate and yet now breast cancer is one of the deadliest cancers. Unfortunately, traditional drug delivery systems for cancer therapy have numerous problems. One of the well-known problems is whole-body drug distribution before reaching cancer tissues, which in turn results in the use of high-dosage drugs and manifestation of serious toxic side effects. Therefore, it seems necessary to use new procedures for medicinal treatment.3,4 The use of nanoplatforms that contain specific ligands is becoming increasingly common to tackle the obstacles associated with conventional strategies. Nanoparticles accumulate in tumors with passive targeting effects, but particular ligands assist delivery systems to selectively recognize receptors at tumor cell surfaces and cause active targeted delivery.

As of now, several targeting agents, such as some types of recombinant proteins, vitamins, amino acids, and sugars, have been applied for active targeting in breast cancers.5 Identification of the best targeting agent for more effective and promising applications in the market should depend on stability, size uniformity, controlled release rate and large-scale manufacturing cost of fabricated nanoparticles.6 However, small targeting molecules are generally consumed in every cell and provide more uniform and stable nanodelivery systems with a greater chance to arrive at markets. Overexpression of folate receptors in breast cancer cells leads to specific uptake of nanoparticles that are conjugated with folate. Folic acid is a great putative marker and a target molecule for cancer diagnosis and therapy.7–10 Additionally, methionine (Met) is one of the essential amino acids and is a key factor in cell metabolism.11 Met is necessary for growth and differentiation of normal and the cancer cells. Therefore, tumor cells have a much greater requirement for Met than normal cells.12,13 Numerous lines of cancer cells such as MCF7 show Met-dependent phenotypes that are unable to survive and grow when the amino acid, Met, is replaced with homocysteine precursors in the medium.14,15 Moreover, it was proven that the rate of Met transfer is increased in tumor cells by over-expressed LAT1 and LAT2 receptors.16–18 Therefore, inhibition of these carriers can suppress the growth of tumor cells. It may be concluded that Met may be used as a selective target for detection of tumor cells by Met-dependent phenotype. Therefore, Met as a targeting agent has been conjugated with some drug and imaging delivery systems for cancer therapy and tumor molecular imaging.19–21

A drug carrier requires to traverse through the cell membrane by favorable biophysical interaction with the lipid bilayer or by modifying lipids that resist movement of nanoparticles through lipid bilayers.22 A suitable drug carrier also needs to have some properties such as high drug-loading capacity, controlled drug release kinetics and target-directed distribution.23,24 Among these features for drug carriers, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) exhibited some significant properties for targeted drug delivery such as controllable size and pore morphology, large inner and outer surface area to conjugate pH-sensitive and targeting agents, high biocompatibility and selective release of cargo at the target region.25 Pore expansion, fabricated pH-sensitive and targeting agents can endow MSNs with ideal properties to deliver their cargo toward cancerous cells.26–28

The aim of this study is to prepare MSN-Met or MSN-FA for active targeted delivery by improved MSNs that have large pores and pH-sensitive release kinetic properties. Docetaxel (DTX), which is a potent anticancer drug and has wide usage in various cancers especially breast cancer, was used as a model hydrophobic anticancer drug.29–31 Prepared DTX/MSN-FA or DTX/MSN-Met were examined for their release profile in different pH conditions, and in vitro cellular tests such as intracellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and apoptosis were performed. To study the targeting abilities of these MSNs, their biodistribution behavior was investigated in both healthy and tumor-induced BALB/c mice by in vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging.

Materials and methods

Materials

Anhydrous DTX was purchased from Jiangsu Yew (Jiangsu, China). Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 98%), 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTS), mesitylene, hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBT), folic acid, methionine, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and MTT dye were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 99%), 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)-propyl] carbodiimide (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide sodium salt (NHS) and 3a, 4, 5, 7a-tetrahydro-7-methyl-5-(tetrahydro-2, 5-dioxo-3-furanyl)-1, 3-isobenzofurandione (Epiclon B-4400) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) with high glucose, RPMI 1640, fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin, L-glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin were purchased from Biosera (Vienna, Austria). Ultra-purified water was used throughout the analyses, and all other chemicals were of analytical grades. Human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7), rat breast cancer cell line (4T1) and BALB/c mice were obtained from Pasteur Institute of Iran (Tehran, Iran).

Synthesis of MSNs and amine functionalization at inner and outer surfaces

The multistep synthesis of large-pore and amine functional MSNs, by one-pot and co-condensation of TEOS and APTS, is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. First, an aqueous solution of CTAB (1 g) and NaOH (0.28 g) was prepared with 480 mL of deionized water,24 and 7 mL of mesitylene was then added.32 After 5 hours of high-speed stirring at 80°C, TEOS (5 mL) and APTS (0.21 mL) were added dropwise into the solution, and the mixture was magnetically stirred for another 2 hours at the same temperature.33 The prepared MSNs were filtered and washed with deionized water and ethanol repeatedly. In the next step, MSNs (1 g) were redispersed in anhydrous ethanol (100 mL), and then APTS (1 mL) was added to the mixture gradually.34 The mixture was stirred for 12 hours and subsequently centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 25 minutes. The residue was washed several times with deionized water to remove unreacted APTS. Finally, MSN-NH2 with amine groups at the inner and outer surfaces were dried under vacuum.

Figure 1

Schematic illustration of multistep synthesis of MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, and MSN-Met.

Abbreviations: MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine; CTAB, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide; TEOS, tetraethyl orthosilicate; APTS, 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane.

Synthesis of MSN-FA

The N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of n class="Chemical">folic acid (NHS-folate) was initially prepared through esterification of folic acid (1 mmol) with NHS (1 mmol) in dry dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, 0.4 mL) solution of EDC (2 mmol) and HOBT (1 mmol).35 The mixture was stirred under N2 gas atmosphere for 30 minutes in an ice bath. Then, NHS-folate was added to the MSN-NH2 suspension (MSN-NH2 0.1 mg, DMSO 4 mL), and it was stirred under N2 gas atmosphere for 72 hours at room temperature. The mixture was washed with deionized water several times to produce MSN-FA (Figure 1).

Synthesis of MSN-Met

The surface of MSN-n class="Chemical">NH2 was modified with Met and epiclon as a cross linker. To do so, a mixture of epiclon (1 mmol) and L-Met (2 mmol) in 5 mL of acetic acid was stirred at room temperature for 3 hours and then refluxed for 8 hours. The solvent was removed under vacuum, and a pale yellow precipitate was collected.36 This precipitate was used for MSN-NH2 modification via the same procedure used for preparation of folic acid-modified MSNs (Figure 1).

Removing CTAB from MSNs

CTAB was removed according to a previously reported procedure by simple modification.37 Briefly, a mixture of NH4NO3 (10 mg/mL) and MSNs (1 mg/mL) was refluxed at 80°C for 6 hours under N2 gas atmosphere. The mixture was centrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 20 minutes and washed with deionized water several times. The procedure was repeated twice with renewal of NH4NO3 solution, and the removed MSNs were eventually obtained.

Characterization of nanoparticles

Different techniques were used to characterize prepared MSNs. The MSNs were tested by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques as well as Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses. SEM (FE-SEM, Tescan/Mira, Brno, Czech Republic) was employed to determine the shape and surface morphology of MSNs. The nanoparticles were coated with gold under vacuum before analysis. TEM was carried out on a Zeiss EM10C, 80 KV, Germany, transmission electron microscope to closely observe MSN morphology. The surface area and pore size of MSNs were calculated by the BET and the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) methods, respectively, on a N2 adsorption–desorption instrument (Quantachrome NOVA Automated Gas Sorption System, 2000e, USA). XRD patterns were collected on a STOE Theta-Theta Powder Diffraction System, STOE & cie GmbH, Germany. The presence of amorphous silica was analyzed from low-angle XRD pattern in the range of 2θ=0.5–8. The surface composition of the nanoparticles at each step of surface modification was determined by infrared (IR) spectra. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Magna IR-550, USA, using KBr pellets.

Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) curves were collected with a TGA STA PT 1600, Linseis, Germany, with a temperature ramp of 5°C/min or 10°C/min for the MSNs. The system was purged under N2 atmosphere with a rate of 50 mL/min. The particle size, size distribution, and zeta potential measurements of the MSNs were taken by dynamic light scattering (DLS; ZEN3600 Zetasizer; Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The surface elements of MSN-Met were determined by energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) with a scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Tescan/Mira) coupled with an EDAX detector. EDAX spectrum was measured at 20 kV accelerating voltage.

Drug entrapping and in vitro release

For drug loading, 50 mg of MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, or MSN-Met were soaked in 5 mL of DTX solution in methanol (50 mg/mL). After stirring for 24 hours under light-sealed conditions, the DTX-loaded MSNs were centrifuged and washed with 20 mL of methanol. To evaluate the DTX loading efficiency, the supernatant was collected, and the residual DTX content was determined by a UV–Vis spectrophotometer at 229.5 nm.38 The loading efficiency and loading capacity of DTX were calculated by Equations 1 and 2, respectively:

DTX release from drug-loaded MSNs was determined in two phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) media with pH values of 5.2 and 7.4 to simulate normal and tumor environments. Due to the poor aqueous solubility of DTX, Tween 80 (0.1% w/v) was added to the release medium to create the sink condition. Briefly, the 10 mg DTX-MSNs were dispersed in both media. These MSN dispersions were shaken at 37°C with a speed of 100 rpm under a light-sealed condition. At a predetermined sampling time, the suspension was centrifuged at 17,000 rpm for 10 minutes, and then, the supernatant was separated. Moreover, the MSNs were resuspended by adding adequate amounts of fresh media in order to continue the release profile, while maintaining the sink condition. Additionally, DTX quantities of the supernatant were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and were based on the calibration curve after filtration through a 0.22 µm membrane filter.39

MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, and MSN-Met labeling

To label MSN-n class="Chemical">NH2, MSN-FA, and MSN-Met, FITC was connected to their amine groups. A solution of 1 mL FITC (0.1 mg/mL) in acetonitrile was added to 10 mg of the particles, and it was stirred at room temperature in darkness for 2 hours.40 The modified MSNs were collected by centrifugation. After three times of washing, the FITC-MSNs were dried under vacuum and used for cellular and animal tests.

Cellular uptake

To reveal cellular uptake efficiency of FITC-MSNs, MCF-7 cells were seeded in 6-well plates with a density of 2×105 cells per well and incubated at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2 for 24 hours. FITC-MSNs (100 µM) and FITC (negative control) were added to each well, and cells were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 2 hours. The culture medium was removed, and cells were softly rinsed twice with PBS. At last, the cells were analyzed using a BD FACSCalibur four-color analysis cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and data were analyzed with WinMDI 2.9 Software.

Cellular cytotoxicity

In vitro cytotoxicity of MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, and MSN-Met containing DTX compared to that of free DTX and biocompatibility of drug-free MSNs were determined using the MTT assay. The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640, containing 10% FBS at 37°C in a humidified and 5% CO2 incubator. Then, MCF-7 cells (1×104) were cultured in a 96-well plate with 100 µL of growth medium per well. For treatment, free DTX stock solution was prepared in the growth medium (containing 0.1% DMSO) and was further serially diluted with the growth medium. Different dilutions of DTX-loaded MSNs were prepared with the same DTX concentration as for free DTX. Cells were incubated for 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours, and then 20 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was added to each well. After cells were incubated for another 4 hours, they were centrifuged and 100 µL of DMSO was added to each well. Supernatant was gathered, and the absorbance was monitored at 570 nm on a microplate ELISA reader (BIOHIT, Finland).41

Evaluation of MCF-7 cell death mechanisms

Annexin V–FITC apoptosis detection kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to quantify the apoptotic and necrotic cells by a standard fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) assay. First, MCF-7 cells were seeded into 6-well plates (2×106 cells per well). After incubation for 24 hours, cells were treated with 100 µL of Hank’s buffer solution containing DTX (positive control) or DTX/MSNs (40 nM) with the same drug concentration at pH 7.4. At the end of the incubation (24 hours), the culture medium was discarded, and cells were washed twice with the Hank’s solution. After monolayer trypsinization, the FITC-labeled Annexin V was added to each well. Cells were incubated at room temperature on the shaker (100 rpm) for 15 minutes in darkness. In the next step, the PI stock solution was added to each well. Finally, cells were incubated for another 5 minutes and washed twice with the Hank’s solution again. Cytometric analyses were carried out on FACSCalibur analysis cytometer by WinMDI 2.9 Software. Throughout early apoptosis, phosphatidylserine (PS) was translocated from the inner to the outer membrane surface. Then, cells with accessible PS were stained with Annexin V. Consequently, propidium iodide (PI) was used for identification of early and late apoptotic cells. Viable cells with undamaged membranes excluded PI, whereas the membranes of dead and damaged cells were permeable to PI.42,43 Therefore, cytometric analyses by FAC-SCalibur were represented of living cells (stained negative for both Annexin V and PI) at lower left quadrant, early apoptotic cells (stained positive for Annexin V and negative for PI) at lower right quadrant, late apoptotic cells at upper right quadrant (stained positive for both Annexin V and PI) and necrotic cells (stained positive for PI) at upper left quadrant.44

Tumor model handling

To develop 4T1 breast tumor model in BALB/c mice, 4T1 cells were cultured in DMEM medium containing 10% FBS, 0.03% l-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2. The murine cells were trypsinized and resuspended in the culture medium. After centrifugation, cells were resuspended in a serum-free medium, and 1×106 cells were injected in the left flank of BALB/c mice under ketamine and xylazine anesthesia. Tumor growth was visible 2–3 weeks postinjection.45

In vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging

An optical imaging system (F PRO, Kodak, US) was used for in vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging, and the excitation and emission wavelengths were set at 495 nm and 519 nm, respectively. In vivo fluorescence imaging was used to observe the real-time distribution of MSNs in healthy BALB/c mice to obtain highly visible intensity and find the proper time for the next stage of the biodistribution study by dissecting the mice organs. Briefly, BALB/c mice were treated with a single dose within heart injection of FITC-MSN-NH2, FITC-MSN-FA, FITC-MSN-Met or PBS (control) on triple groups. The near infrared (NIR) fluorescent images were obtained at 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours and 24 hours after injection of 0.2 mL of nanoparticles (10 mg/mL) by Kodak in vivo imaging system. At the best intensity time, the study was conducted on scarified organs of both healthy and tumor-induced BALB/c mice. Kodak Molecular Imaging Software 5.X was employed for fluorescence image analysis of each organ and tumor tissue in both healthy and tumor-induced BALB/c mice. Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. All animal-handling procedures were performed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (purchase, transportation, maintenance and slaughter) and followed the guidelines of the Animal Welfare Act and Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical analysis

The results were expressed as mean ± SD. The significance of differences between groups was determined via two-way analysis of variance followed by the Newman–Keuls multiple comparison tests. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. All statistics were conducted using GraphPad Prism 6.01 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) for Windows.

Results and discussion

According to the SEM image of MSN-NH2, samples were found to be uniform with a good dispersion and spherical shape (~50 nm in diameter), which was also revealed by TEM image (Figure 2A and B). Mesoporous structure of MCM-41 could also be confirmed with nanochannels of MSN-NH2 in the TEM image.46

Figure 2

Representative of SEM and TEM images, nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm, BJH size distribution plots, and XRD pattern of MSN-NH2.

Notes: (A) SEM image, (B) TEM image, (C) nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm, (D) BJH pore size distribution, (E) size distribution by number from DLS method, and (F) low–angle XRD pattern of MSN-NH2.

Abbreviations: SEM, scanning electron microscopy; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; BJH, Barrett–Joyner–Halenda; DLS, dynamic light scattering; XRD, X-ray diffraction; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle.

The synthesized MSN-NH2 exhibited an average diameter of 49 nm with a narrow size distribution (polydispersity index =0.222; Figure 2E). As DLS measures hydrodynamic diameter,47,48 the larger size was observed by DLS method in Figure 2E. DLS analysis of obtained MSNs showed satisfactory dispersion for cellular and animal tests.

The formation of a mesoporous structure was confirmed by BET analysis. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm of MSN-NH2 showed a typical type IV isotherm49 with a narrow hysteresis loop, and the ~700 m2/g of MSN-NH2 revealed the highest BET surface area (Figure 2C). BJH pore size distribution is depicted in Figure 2D. Average pore diameters of 3.8 nm were obtained for MSN-NH2, showing the fact that mesitylene was attributed to micelle composition and generated bigger pore sizes.

XRD analysis of n class="Gene">MSN-NH2 showed the pattern that is typical for mesoporous materials.49 The pattern at low-angle XRD demonstrated three main diffraction peaks at 2.1, 3.7, and 5.62 related to the (100), (110), and (200) lattice planes, respectively (Figure 2F).

The Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of the MSNs confirmed modification of the MSNs with different functional groups. Figure 3 exhibits FTIR spectra of MSN-NH2, MSN-Met, and MSN-FA. The strong peaks appeared at around 1,080, 950, and 800 cm−1 are due to the stretching vibration of Si–O–Si, Si–OH, and Si–O, respectively, which are specific peaks of the silica nanoparticles, and the broad band around 3,400 cm−1 can be attributed to the N–H or O–H groups. The band appeared at around 1,600 cm−1 is ascribed to the bending vibration of O–H or N–H. Additionally, the bands at about 2,900 cm−1 correspond to the C–H stretching vibration of amino propyl groups. The appearance of a peak at about 1,620–1,650 cm−1 could be attributed to the formation of amide bands after MSN-NH2 modification with folate or epiclon–Met. The stretching vibration at around 1,700 cm−1 implies the presence of acid groups of epiclon (Figure 3).

Figure 3

FTIR spectra of (A) MSN-NH2, (B) MSN-FA, and (C) MSN-Met.

Abbreviations: FTIR, Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine.

Zeta potentials demonstrated surface modifications of MSNs. The amine functionalization caused changes in zeta potential for MSN-NH2 (+5.9). Also, positively charged folate conjugation increased the zeta potential of MSN-FA to +8.11 mV. Surface modification with negatively charged epiclon–Met was confirmed by decreasing the zeta potential of the MSN-Met to −5.65 mV.

The surface composition of MSN-Met was qualitatively determined by energy dispersion spectrum (EDAX) as shown in Figure 4. It shows that C, N, O, Si, and S peaks were obtained with the atomic ratios (%) of 19.69, 9.81, 53.65, 16.14, and 0.71, respectively. Therefore, it is assumed that Met was carefully conjugated on the surface of MSN-NH2 by epiclon as the cross linker.

Figure 4

EDAX spectra obtained of MSN-Met.

Abbreviations: EDAX, energy dispersive X-ray analysis; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; Met, methionine; C, carbon; N, nitrogen; O, oxygen; Si, silicon; S, sulfur.

The incorporation of organic moieties was further confirmed by TGA of MSNs (Figure 5). Results showed that MSN-FA and MSN-Met lost up to 17.18% and 17.80% of their total mass at 800°C, while MSN-NH2 only lost up to 15.16% of its mass at the same temperature. These analyses confirm the higher carbon contents of folate and Met-modified silica than that of MSN-NH2. The difference in weight loss between MSN-FA and MSN-Met with MSN-NH2 can be attributed to decomposable folic acid and Met–epiclon groups, respectively. Based on TGA results, the calculated molar organic contents of folate and Met–epiclon are about 0.0457 mol/g and 0.0474 mol/g, respectively.

Figure 5

TGA curves for MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, and MSN-Met.

Abbreviations: TGA, thermogravimetric analysis; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine.

DTX loading and release

Previous studies showed that MSNs tend to have a high loading capacity, but low-loaded drug amounts are obtained for poorly water-soluble and large molecule drugs.40,50–53 However, in this study, the large-pore MSNs caused high pay loading of DTX.41,42 The drug-loading amounts of DTX in MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, and MSN-Met are shown in Table 1, which increased compared to the prior studies.54 Higher loading of DTX into MSN-NH2 and MSN-FA pores is related to the strong electrostatic attraction between the negative charge of DTX and the positive charge of MSNs surface. The zeta potential of MSN-NH2 and MSN-FA was found to be positive, but MSN-Met has shown negative zeta potential. Another possible reason for this phenomena (lower loading of DTX into MSN-Met) could be due to the steric hindrance of the epiclon–Met on the surfaces of MSNs resulting in acting as a band for entrance of DTX.55,56 In addition, the in vitro release profiles of DTX from MSNs under different pH conditions were drawn as shown in Figure 6. All MSNs showed a pH-dependent DTX release pattern in the buffer medium in neutral and acidic pH. Hence, amine groups at inner pore surfaces led to controlled and pH-sensitive release of the DTX molecules by electrostatic attraction. Considering the fact that the tumor tissues are more acidic than the normal tissues, the ideal pH sensitive system is the one in which drugs are hardly released in normal tissues and consequently inhibit toxic side effects but can be released in tumor tissues or cancer cells to the enhancement of drug efficiency.

Table 1

Loading efficiency percentage and loading capacity percentage of MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, and MSN-Met with DTX

Nanoparticles	Loading efficiency (%)	Loading capacity (%)
MSN-NH2	20.81±2.33	7.68±0.32
MSN-FA	18.19±2.74	6.78±0.33
MSN-Met	9.78±1.81	3.77±0.28

Note: Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Abbreviations: MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine; DTX, docetaxel.

Figure 6

In vitro DTX release profiles from MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, and MSN-Met.

Note: Results are expressed at pH =5.5 and 7.4, 37°C (n=3).

Abbreviations: DTX, docetaxel; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine; h, hours.

Intracellular uptake

MSN cellular uptake and accumulation after exposure of MCF-7 cells to MSNs-FITC were indicated by flow cytometry (FCM) results. Figure 7 shows the more affinity of MCF-7 cells to the MSNs-FITC in comparison with free FITC as negative control (1.4%±0.3% intracellular uptake). FCM studies on MCF-7 cells showed an 8.3%±0.09% intracellular uptake for MSN-NH2, but high intracellular uptake ratios of 23.2%±1.7% and 79.3%±1.9% were obtained for MSN-Met and MSN-FA, respectively. These outcomes indicated that the higher affinity of MCF-7 cells to targeted MSNs than MSN-NH2. On the other hand, these results corroborate the better cell viability of MSN-FA in MCF-7 cells than of other MSNs, which is confirmed by the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) results. According to the past studies, it seems that the cellular uptake of the MSNs may happen through macro pinocytosis.57–59 However, the exact mechanism of cellular uptake of MSNs is not completely clear and requires more research. The comparison of MSNs uptake in MCF-7 cells demonstrated that, although MCF-7 cells express a much higher level of LAT1, LAT2, and FA receptors, they internalized much more targeted MSNs (MSN-Met and MSN-FA) compared to MSN-NH2. Consequently, the uptake of MSNs can be enhanced by using folic acid and Met as targeting ligands, and data confirm the important role of the targeting moiety.60–63 These observations suggest that the intracellular uptake of MSN-Met and MSN-FA was more target-specific. Figure 7 shows that MSN-FA intracellular uptake in MCF-7 was higher than that found in MSN-Met. Further, it can be deduced that the uptake of MSN-FA in MCF-7 cells was 3–4 times higher than the MSN-Met uptake and 9–10 times more efficient than MSN-NH2. This indicates efficient uptake of the MSN-FA for breast cancer cells. Moreover, the results confirm that the MSN-FA was cell permeable, indicating a potential application in intracellular drug delivery.

Figure 7

Fluorescent intensity of (A) free FITC, (B) MSN-NH2, (C) MSN-FA, and (D) MSN-Met in MCF-7 cells analyzed by FACS.

Abbreviations: FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting. FL, logarithm of fluorescence intensity.

Inhibitory effect against tumor cells

MTT assay was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity. DTX/MSNs cytotoxicity compared with free DTX at equivalent concentrations is shown in Figure 8. After 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours of exposure, DTX-loaded MSNs exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxicity. All the DTX/MSN types exhibited significantly more cytotoxic effect than free DTX in all mentioned incubation times. The poor solubility of DTX may limit its internalization into cells, but the uptake of MSNs may lead to the more efficient DTX accumulation and higher cytotoxicity of DTX/MSNs. MTT assay results at different time periods indicate that pretreatment with free DTX and DTX/MSNs will cause lower cell viability at longer incubation period. Targeted DTX/MSNs were more cytotoxic compared to DTX/MSN-NH2, and DTX/MSN-FA toxicity was higher than DTX/MSN-Met. The MTT assay results show that targeted DTX/MSNs increased cytotoxicity and DTX/MSN-FA was more successful, which was confirmed by uptake and apoptosis outcomes. As shown in Table 2, the obtained IC50 results show no significant cytotoxicity after 24 hours of treatment of blank MSN-NH2, MSN-Met, and MSN-FA on MCF-7 cells. It can be concluded that MSNs are biocompatible carriers and play no role in toxicity in MCF-7 cells.64,65 Overall, results attest to the potential of DTX/MSNs for DTX delivery by increasing the effectiveness of targeted delivery.

Figure 8

Cytotoxicity of DTX/MSN-NH2, DTX/MSN-Met and DTX/MSN-FA compared to free DTX against MCF-7 cells after treatment for (A) 24 hours, (B) 48 hours, and (C) 72 hours. Data represent mean ± SD (n=3).

Abbreviations: DTX, docetaxel; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; Met, methionine; FA, folic acid; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2

Outcomes for IC50 calculations based on the linear model

Nanoparticles	IC50 (nM)
MSN-NH2	12,335±356.27
MSN-FA	12,890±499.11
MSN-Met	12,564±217.20
DTX/MSN-NH2	8.14±0.62
DTX/MSN-FA	5.72±0.58
DTX/MSN-Met	6.99±0.27
Free DTX	81.85±7.51

Note: Data represent mean ± SD (n=3).

Abbreviations: MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine; DTX, docetaxel; SD, standard deviation; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration.

Death mechanisms of MCF-7 cells

The death mechanisms of MCF-7 cells treated with the DTX/MSN-NH2, DTX/MSN-Met, and DTX/MSN-FA nanoparticles and free DTX for 24 hours were evaluated by FCM and FACS protocols (Figure 9). Early apoptosis was induced in 4.46%, 11.79%, and 14.13% of the MCF-7 cells after treatment with the DTX/MSN-NH2, DTX/MSN-Met, and DTX/MSN-FA nanoparticles, respectively. Treatment with DTX had a slight influence on the MCF-7 cells and induced early apoptosis in 1.32% of the cells, which could be attributed to the poor internalization of DTX into cells. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with the DTX/MSN-NH2, DTX/MSN-Met, and DTX/MSN-FA nanoparticles and free DTX induced late apoptosis and necrosis in 20.52%, 3.39%, 56.99%, and 3.82% of the cells, respectively. The free DTX shows very little influence on the apoptosis and necrosis of MCF-7 cells than other DTX-loaded nanoparticles. However, DTX/MSN samples with the same DTX concentration could simultaneously induce distinct early and late apoptosis of MCF-7 cells in 1 day (Figure 9). DTX/MSNs could induce more late apoptosis of MCF-7 cells than early apoptosis. Compared with DTX/MSNs, DTX/MSN-FA remarkably would induce early and late apoptosis of MCF-7 cells at the same particle concentrations, and DTX/MSN-Met showed higher early and late apoptotic cells than DTX/MSN-NH2, which is also dependent on the target group as showed in previous studies.24,66 To sum up, DTX/MSNs could induce MCF-7 cell apoptosis by a synergistic apoptosis effect, which could be attributed to an enhancement of DTX uptake with synergistic effects of target groups by MCF-7 cells (Table 3).

Figure 9

Evaluation of the death mechanisms for MCF-7 cells treated with (A) DTX, (B) DTX/MSN-NH2, (C) DTX/MSN-Met, and (D) DTX/MSN-FA for 1 day by FCM and FACS protocols.

Abbreviations: DTX, docetaxel; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; Met, methionine; FA, folic acid; FCM, flow cytometry; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FL, logarithm of fluorescence intensity.

Table 3

The percentages of the different types of cell deaths induced by DTX, DTX/MSN-NH2, DTX/MSN-Met, and DTX/MSN-FA as observed by FCM

Cell type concentration	DTX	MSN-NH2	MSN-FA	MSN-Met
Living cells (%)	94.07±1.08	74.77±2.22	47.22±2.62	29.64±1.50
Early apoptotic cells (%)	1.58±0.27	4.60±0.78	13.54±1.84	15.20±1.34
Late apoptotic cells (%)	2.32±0.42	14.81±1.49	34.91±3.08	52.42±1.22
Necrotic cells (%)	2.03±0.34	5.82±1.87	4.33±0.40	2.74±0.44

Note: Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n=3).

Abbreviations: DTX, docetaxel; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; Met, methionine; FA, folic acid; FCM, flow cytometry.

In vivo distribution of nanoparticles

For in vivo biodistribution analyses, first biodistribution behaviors of all MSNs were evaluated in healthy BALB/c mice by Kodak in vivo imaging system. At the next stage, NIR fluorescence images of ex vivo organs were obtained from scarified BALB/c mice 2 hours after injection. The biodistribution behavior of MSN-NH2, MSN-Met, and MSN-FA at equal concentrations (1 mg/0.1 mL) was assessed to compare the effect of the target-directed folic acid and Met agents for active targeted delivery, with MSN-NH2 as a passive delivery agent. A single dose of FITC-MSNs and PBS as the control group was injected within the heart in triple groups. Figure 10 displays the NIR fluorescence images of the healthy BALB/c mice at prescheduled time points after the injection of FITC-MSNs. The images show that the highest accumulation time point was 2 hours after injection. As shown in Figure 10, 2 hours after the administration of FITC-MSNs in healthy BALB/c mice, more MSN-NH2 were accumulated in the liver, but MSN-Met and MSN-FA were more observed in the kidney as confirmed by ex vivo results. At the best intensity time point of treatment, the animals were scarified in order to observe nanoparticle distributions. This examination was performed on both healthy and tumor-induced mice. Fluorescence intensities of ex vivo organs were measured by Kodak Molecular Imaging Software 5.X for image analysis. Organs and tumor-induced tissues that take different FITC-MSNs amounts are displayed in Figure 11. Among healthy BALB/c mice organs, higher accumulations of MSNs were accumulated in the lung, liver, and kidney than in other organs. Notably among tumor-induced BALB/c mice organs and tumor tissues, the highest fluorescence intensities of all FITC-MSNs were seen in the tumor tissues. Additionally, MSN-NH2 accumulation in the liver was much higher than that in the kidney. Conversely, targeted MSNs were more accumulated in the kidney than in the liver. This can be related to renal execration trends of targeted MSNs by surface modification.66

Figure 10

In vivo fluorescence imaging of healthy BALB/c mice after injection of (A) MSN-NH2, (B) MSN-FA, and (C) MSN-Met (n=3).

Abbreviations: MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine; h, hours.

Figure 11

Images of dissected organs of (A) healthy and (B) tumor-induced BALB/c mice after injection of MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, or MSN-Met (n=3).

Abbreviations: MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine.

The accumulations of MSNs in different organs were analyzed by calculating the mean fluorescence intensities. As plotted in Figure 12A and B, the most accumulated organ for all MSNs was the lung, whereas the accumulation of MSNs decreased in the liver, kidney, spleen, and heart, respectively. However, targeted MSNs had a tendency to be present more in the kidney that has less metabolic action than in the liver. Moreover, obviously higher fluorescence was observed in the tumor tissue compared with other tissues and fluorescence intensity in the tumor tissue was relatively high in MSN-FA (P<0.05). Higher accumulation of all MSNs in tumor tissues with high permeability completely confirmed passive targeted delivery by nanoparticles.67,68 On the other hand, folic acid modification on to the surface of the MSNs induced an efficient delivery, and this is while MSN-Met accumulation in tumor tissues was relatively small, which suggests folic acid as a suitable targeting agent for active target-directed delivery.39,69,70

Figure 12

Biodistribution of MSN-NH2, MSN-FA, and MSN-Met in (A) healthy and (B) tumor-induced BALB/c mice 2 hours following injection.

Notes: Obtained data were calculated as percentages of mean intensity and represented as mean ± SD (n=3). **P<0.05; ***P<0.01; ****P<0.001.

Abbreviations: MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FA, folic acid; Met, methionine; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SD, standard deviation.

Conclusion

Functionalized and DTX-loaded MSNs (DTX/MSN-NH2, DTX/MSN-Met, and DTX/MSN-FA) that were designed in this study have a high drug-loading capacity and pH-sensitive drug release kinetic. The examination of cytotoxicity and cell death mechanisms shows that cytotoxicity of targeted nanoparticles increased and more apoptosis and necrosis occurred. Biodistribution behavior by ex vivo fluorescent imaging on sacrificed tumor-induced BALB/c mice attested to the accumulation of MSNs in tumor tissues, which confirmed the targeting ability of MSN-FA compared with that of MSN-Met and MSN-NH2. Overall, the results showed that DTX/MSN-FA exhibited enhanced target-directed drug delivery for breast cancer, which can cause a decrease in dose, raise cytotoxic effects and efficiently repress cancer cells. In conclusion, DTX/MSN-FA exhibited enhanced antitumor efficacy, which makes them promising substances for cancer therapy.