Literature DB >> 2798030

Efficiency of graphical perception.

G E Legge, Y C Gu, A Luebker.   

Abstract

The term graphical perception refers to the part played by visual perception in analyzing graphs. Computer graphics have stimulated interest in the perceptual pros and cons of different formats for displaying data. One way of evaluating the effectiveness of a display is to measure the efficiency (as defined by signal-detection theory) with which an observer extracts information from the graph. We measured observers' efficiencies in detecting differences in the means or variances of pairs of data sets sampled from Gaussian distributions. Sample size ranged from 1 to 20 for viewing times of 0.3 or 1 sec. The samples were displayed in three formats: numerical tables, scatterplots, and luminance-coded displays. Efficiency was highest for the scatterplots (approximately equal to 60% for both means and variances) and was only weakly dependent on sample size and exposure time. The pattern of results suggests parallel perceptual computation in which a constant proportion of the available information is used. Efficiency was lowest for the numerical tables and depended more strongly on sample size and viewing time. The results suggest serial processing in which a fixed amount of the available information is processed in a given time.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2798030     DOI: 10.3758/bf03204990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  Brightness function: effects of adaptation.

Authors:  J C STEVENS; S S STEVENS
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1963-03

2.  Brightness function: effect of area and duration.

Authors:  R J Mansfield
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1973-08

3.  The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots.

Authors:  A Burgess; H B Barlow
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Effect of quantization noise on visual signal detection in noisy images.

Authors:  A Burgess
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

6.  The statistical efficiency for detecting sinusoidal modulation of average dot density in random figures.

Authors:  A van Meeteren; H B Barlow
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.

Authors:  A E Burgess; R F Wagner; R J Jennings; H B Barlow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays.

Authors:  H B Barlow; B C Reeves
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns.

Authors:  H B Barlow
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Statistical efficiency for the detection of visual noise.

Authors:  D Kersten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  5 in total

1.  Numeracy and communication with patients: they are counting on us.

Authors:  Andrea J Apter; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Janine T Remillard; Ian M Bennett; Elana Pearl Ben-Joseph; Rosanna M Batista; James Hyde; Rima E Rudd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The surprisingly high human efficiency at learning to recognize faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Better sensitivity to linear and nonlinear trends with position than with color.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Amelia C Warden
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The nature of correlation perception in scatterplots.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

5.  Distorted optical input affects human perception.

Authors:  Gad Serero; Maria Lev; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.