Kaname Kawajiri1, Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama2. 1. Research Institute for Clinical Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, 818 Komuro, Ina-machi, Saitama 362-0806, Japan. 2. Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Abstract
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a pivotal chemical sensor that transduces extrinsic and intrinsic signals into cellular responses. AHR was originally thought to be involved in not only drug metabolism but also carcinogenic and toxicological responses against environmental contaminants, such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. However, recent studies demonstrate that the AHR plays multiple intrinsic roles in host defense and homeostasis as well, including immunity, stem cell maintenance, and cell differentiation, upon binding with an increasing number of newly defined dietary, cellular, and microbe-derived ligands. In addition, AHR is a convergence point for several signaling cascades, which may be involved in the diverse diseases caused by binding of the persistent ligand TCDD with extremely high affinity to AHR. A comprehensive understanding of physiological and pathological processes initiated by endogenous AHR agonists and antagonists may allow for the therapeutic regulation of AHR activity. Thus, the AHR can be a valuable diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for human diseases.
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a pivotal chemical sensor that transduces extrinsic and intrinsic signals into cellular responses. AHR was originally thought to be involved in not only drug metabolism but also carcinogenic and toxicological responses against environmental contaminants, such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. However, recent studies demonstrate that the AHR plays multiple intrinsic roles in host defense and homeostasis as well, including immunity, stem cell maintenance, and cell differentiation, upon binding with an increasing number of newly defined dietary, cellular, and microbe-derived ligands. In addition, AHR is a convergence point for several signaling cascades, which may be involved in the diverse diseases caused by binding of the persistent ligand TCDD with extremely high affinity to AHR. A comprehensive understanding of physiological and pathological processes initiated by endogenous AHR agonists and antagonists may allow for the therapeutic regulation of AHR activity. Thus, the AHR can be a valuable diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for human diseases.
Introduction: A Short History of TCDD and AHR Research
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a toxic byproduct of various
industrial, combustion, and natural processes that is now a persistent and ubiquitous
environmental contaminant in air, water, soil, and food. TCDD exerts a broad spectrum of
toxic effects even at very low concentrations. Lethal doses of TCDD cause slow death as a
result of a wasting syndrome, while reproductive and developmental effects, tumor promotion,
immune suppression, and skin lesions called chloracne are observed at nonlethal doses [53]. TCDD is probably best known as a contaminant in
Agent Orange, a mixture of N-butyl esters of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic (2,4-D) and
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic (2,4,5-T) acids widely used as defoliants by the United States
during the war in Vietnam (1962–1971) [88]. In 1968,
a mass food poisoning termed “Yusho” occurred in western Japan, and the causal agent of
“Yusho” was thought to be polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) [65]. In 1976, a severe industrial accident occurred in Seveso, Italy, and
up to kilogram quantities of TCDD and additional TCDD-like chemicals were dispersed into the
air, with adverse health consequences for the local population [30]. In 2004, Viktor Yushchenko, who was the president of Ukraine at that
time and had been exposed to TCDD at a single oral dose 5 million-fold higher than the
accepted daily exposure for the general population, became a widely recognized victim of
TCDD poisoning [81]. Since the summer of 2013, more
than 100 rusty barrels have been unearthed from land in Okinawa City that was formerly part
of Kadena Air Base. Tests on the barrels’ contents have revealed ingredients of Vietnam-era
defoliants, including 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and TCDD [60].The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is traditionally defined as a ligand-dependent
transcription factor involved in the biotransformation and carcinogenic/teratogenic effects
of environmental toxins, such as TCDD and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The AHR
was first identified in the mid-1970s as the cytoplasmic receptor that binds TCDD with an
extremely high affinity [72], and it was further
revealed that PAHs also bind to the receptor followed by induction of drug-metabolizing P450
(CYP1A1) [25]. In the first few decades after its
discovery, AHR studies focused largely on the responses to xenobiotics.In 1991, Bradfield el al. [10]
reported a partial N-terminal 27 amino acid sequence of the purified fragment of mouseAHR,
and cDNA clones for the Ahr were soon isolated independently by two
research groups [12, 20] using oligonucleotide probes synthesized according to the determined
N-terminal partial sequence. At the same time, Reyes et al. isolated a cDNA
for AHR Nuclear Translocator (ARNT), a factor required for nuclear translocation of the AHR
by the cytogenetic methods [79]. The amino acid
sequences of AHR and ARNT revealed the presence of a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) motif and
Period-ARNT-Single minded homology region (PAS) domains. The isolation of
Ahr and Arnt cDNAs and their cognate genes greatly
accelerated our understanding of the molecular mechanisms concerning the regulatory
functions of the AHR in response to chemicals, including TCDD and 3MC. In 1999, Mimura
et al. [58] isolated a cDNA for
AhR Repressor (AHRR), a negative regulator of the AHR signaling pathway. In the mid-1990s,
Ahr-deficient mice were generated by three independent groups [21, 59, 82] with the homologous recombination method, and
experiments using these mutant mice have substantially extended the knowledge about the
regulatory functions of the AHR in immunology and physiology as well as pharmacology and
toxicology [22].Information regarding AHR phylogeny in the animal kingdom has expanded rapidly with the
recent development and increased accessibility of advanced gene cloning technology. The
presence of Ahr homologs in most major groups of animals, including
representatives of the bilaterians, cnidarians, and placozoans, provides strong evidence
that the original eumetazoa, whose last common ancestor lived approximately 600 million
years ago (MYA), possessed an Ahr homolog [27]. The Ahr orthologs in C. elegans [73] and D. melanogaster [19], respectively, contribute to the development of
specific neurons and sensory neurons, but they exhibit no ligand binding. Thus, the ligand
binding may be a secondary and acquired function of this receptor that arose during
vertebrate evolution, and the primary function of the mammalianAHR is probably related to
normal development and homeostasis. In fact, AHR has recently been revealed to be implicated
in immune responses, stem cell regulation, inflammation, cell differentiation and
proliferation, apoptosis, reproduction, and tumor suppression [22]. As these intrinsic functions of the AHR are performed largely in
response to endogenous ligands generated from the host cell, diet, or microbiota, AHR is
currently considered an environmental chemical senor, connecting external environmental
signals to cellular processes. In addition, the AHR is a convergence point of multiple
signaling pathways that may contribute to the pathogenesis of diseases caused by toxic
ligands such as TCDD. In this review, we will summarize and discuss our recent advances in
the studies on the regulatory mechanisms and physiological functions of the AHR, with
emphasis on immunity, stem cell maintenance, and cell differentiation.
AHR Signaling Pathways
Structure of AHR, ARNT, and AHRR
AHR and ARNT are members of a structurally related gene family within the bHLH/PAS
superfamily, whose members have critical functions in gene expression networks underlying
many essential physiological and developmental processes, particularly those requiring
responses to environmental signals [55]. As is
already known, the bHLH motif in the N-terminal region is involved in DNA binding and
dimerization of proteins. This domain specific for AHR contains both nuclear localization
(NLS) and nuclear export signals (NES) for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling (Fig. 1A). In contrast, ARNT contains only an NLS in the bHLH domain for constitutive
nuclear localization. The AHRPAS domain consisting of two imperfect repeats, PAS A and
PAS B, is considered to be an interactive surface for protein-protein interactions in
dimer formation, and the PAS B region is overlapped in part with a minimal ligand-binding
domain (LBD) and the binding site for heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), a chaperone that
maintains the ligand-binding conformation of AHR. In addition to the PAS B domain, HSP90
interacts with the bHLH region to mask the NLS, resulting in cytoplasmic localization of
AHR. The C-terminal segments of AHR and ARNT both contain transcriptional activation
domains (TADs), the activities of which are mediated through CBP/p300 and RIP140
coactivators. On the other hand, AHRR is structurally similar to the AHR in the bHLH
region, which allows it to dimerize with ARNT and binds Xenobiotic Responsive Element
(XRE; 5′-TNGCGTG-3′) [23]. The C-terminal
repression domain of the AHRR has three SUMOylation sites, all of which must be SUMOylated
for full suppressive activity on the AHR target genes [22].
Fig. 1.
A: A schematic representation of the mouse C57BL/6 AHR. The characterized domains
represented are the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH), Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS), and
transactivation domains. DBD, DNA binding domain; HSP90, HSP90 interaction domain;
LBD, ligand binding domain; Q, glutamine-rich transcription activation domain; A and
B, weakly homologous repeated regions. Signals for nuclear import (NLS: red) and
export (NES: yellow) are shown. B: A schematic model for the transcriptional
regulation of the AHR/ARNT activator complex and AHRR/ARNT repressor complex.
Unmodified ARNT forms a heterodimer with AHR and recruits coactivators, such as
CBP/p300, to form the transcriptional activator complex. Meanwhile, ARNT forms a
heterodimer with AHRR, which significantly enhances the SUMOylation of both
proteins. SUMOylated AHRR recruits corepressors, such as HDAC4, HDAC5, and ANKRA2,
to form the transcriptional repressor complex.
A: A schematic representation of the mouse C57BL/6 AHR. The characterized domains
represented are the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH), Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS), and
transactivation domains. DBD, DNA binding domain; HSP90, HSP90 interaction domain;
LBD, ligand binding domain; Q, glutamine-rich transcription activation domain; A and
B, weakly homologous repeated regions. Signals for nuclear import (NLS: red) and
export (NES: yellow) are shown. B: A schematic model for the transcriptional
regulation of the AHR/ARNT activator complex and AHRR/ARNT repressor complex.
Unmodified ARNT forms a heterodimer with AHR and recruits coactivators, such as
CBP/p300, to form the transcriptional activator complex. Meanwhile, ARNT forms a
heterodimer with AHRR, which significantly enhances the SUMOylation of both
proteins. SUMOylated AHRR recruits corepressors, such as HDAC4, HDAC5, and ANKRA2,
to form the transcriptional repressor complex.
Ligand diversity of AHR
Environmental chemicals such as synthetic PAHs and halogenated PAHs are considered
classic AHR ligands [18, 64]. Increasing interest in the intrinsic functions of the AHR has led
to the identification of many natural AHR ligands generated by cells and microbiota or
derived from dietary sources [37].
6-Formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ) is an ultraviolet photoproduct of
L-tryptophan that can also be generated by other metabolic pathways [86]. Indolo[3,2-b]carbazole (ICZ) is generated with
3,3-diindolylmethane (DIM) from indole-3-carbinol (I3C) under acidic conditions in the
stomach [37]. I3C is enzymatically generated from
glucobrassicin, an L-tryptophan-derived glucosinolate contained in cruciferous vegetables,
such as broccoli and cabbage. Kynurenine (Kyn) is a tryptophan metabolite generated by the
enzymes indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) [37]. Organic extractions from porcine lung tissues led
to the discovery of the high-affinity AHR ligand
2-(1’H-indole-3′-carbonyl)-thiazole-4-carboxylic acid methyl ester (ITE)
[37]. Both indigo and indirubin are AHR ligands
that have been identified in human urine [1]. Some
microbe-derived ligands can also bind the AHR and activate AHR signaling;
Malassezia, a commensal yeast in human skin, can metabolize tryptophan
into AHR ligands including FICZ and ICZ [52], and
Lactobacillus converts tryptophan into indole-3-aldehyde (IAld) [98]. Bacterial pigmented virulence factors, such as
phenazines and naphthoquinone phthiocol, have recently been shown to bind the AHR [62]. Several naturally occurring marine-derived
brominated indoles also bind to the AHR [17]. In
addition, a variety of AHR antagonists with heterogenous characteristics have been
reported [18, 64].
Transcriptional regulation mediated by the AHR
In the absence of a ligand, AHR exists in a latent state complexed with HSP90, hepatitis
B virus X-associated protein 2 (XAP2, also known as AIP or ARA9), and p23 chaperone (p23)
in the cytoplasm. Ligand binding results in a conformational change that in turn leads to
nuclear translocation of the AHR complex in association with importins. In the nucleus,
the translocated AHR exchanges the HSP90 complex for ARNT present there. Thus, the formed
AHR/ARNT complex then binds to XRE to initiate transcription of the target genes.The mechanisms of AHR-mediated transcription are best characterized for the
Cyp1a1 gene. In the approximately 1-kb sequence upstream of the
Cyp1a1 gene, a cluster of XREs function as an enhancer. Furthermore, a
basic transcription element (BTE), a GC box sequence located immediately upstream of the
gene, and the transcription factor SP1 that binds to the GC box sequence are required for
full Cyp1a1 expression because the binding of the two transcription
factors to their cis-elements is synergistic. Chromatin remodeling is
initiated by the liganded AHR/ARNT heterodimer binding to XREs in the enhancer region,
which leads to increased DNase sensitivity and the appearance of a DNase hypersensitive
site within 300 bp upstream of the transcription initiation sites. Studies have shown that
when the AHR/ARNT complex binds to the XRE sequences, the heterodimer recruits CBP/p300,
NCOA1, NCOA2, NCOA3, and other coactivators, including RIP140, as well as components of
the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes such as BRG-1, p-TEFβ, and RNA elongation
factors. In addition, the TRAP/DRIP/ARC/Mediator complex must be recruited to the
Cyp1a1 promoter to activate the target gene expression in response to
xenobiotic stress. AHR signaling can be downregulated by negative feedback inhibition
through an AHRR transcription factor whose expression is activated by the AHR. Newly
synthesized AHRR then translocates into the nucleus and forms a heterodimer with ARNT, and
this heterodimer competitively binds to the XRE sequences, followed by recruitment of
corepressors such as ANKLA2, HDAC4, and HDAC5 (Fig.
1B) [6, 22, 28, 89].
AHR in Immunity
The AHR is an important regulator of the development and function of both innate and
adaptive immune cells through its ability to respond to cellular, dietary, and environmental
exogenous ligands [99]. The innate immune system
represents the first line of defense against infections by microbial pathogens and is
mediated primarily by myeloid lineage cells, such as macrophages and neutrophils, while
adaptive immune responses are dependent on the activation, differentiation, and clonal
expansion of antigen-specific T and B lymphocytes over a period of several days after
infection. The AHR is induced in several immune cell types by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and
microbial infection, and the promoters of many genes involved in the immune responses
contain multiple XRE sequences [43].
AHR in the innate immune system
Antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as macrophages and dendritic cells, are important
for innate immune defense and for the generation and regulation of adaptive immunity
against various pathogens. Upon LPS treatment, the serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and
IL-1β were significantly elevated in Ahr-deficient mice as compared with
those in wild-type mice [45, 83, 93]. Moreover, peritoneal
macrophages isolated from Ahr-deficient mice exhibited much higher IL-6
secretion in response to LPS treatment than those from wild-type mice. These results
indicate that AHR suppresses the expression of inflammatory cytokines to protect against
persistent inflammation. In addition, peritoneal macrophages showed markedly enhanced AHR
expression in response to LPS treatment. The AHR-dependent repression of IL-6 production
may be caused via two independent mechanisms. First, AHR appears to play
a suppressive role by forming a complex with STAT1 and NF-κB in macrophages, leading to
the inhibition of Il6 gene promoter activity [45]. In addition, an interaction between the AHR and SP1 in LPS-treated
macrophages can inhibit histidine decarboxylase expression and reduce the production of
histamine, an important signal molecule involved in the inflammation [54]. In the case of IL-1β secretion, the AHR activates
the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2) [83], an inhibitor of caspase-1 activation that functions in the process
of IL-1β secretion [26]. AHR ligands markedly
enhanced PAI-2 expression in wild-type macrophages, and transfection of the
Ahr-deficient macrophages with PAI-2 restored suppression of IL-1β
secretion. Using compound mutant mice lacking both genes for the AHR and ASC, which is an
essential for caspase-1 activation in inflammasomes, we demonstrated a functional
association between the ASC- and AHR-directed pathways in the regulation of the
IL-1β-dependent inflammatory response in vivo [38].Kimura et al. [44] showed that
AHR is critical for the confinement and clearance of Listeria
monocytogenes(LM, the food-borne causative pathogen of listeriosis)in
vitro and in vivo. Ahr-deficient mice showed
high susceptibility to LM infection. The AHR contributes to macrophage survival by
inducing the apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages (AIM) and promoting the production of
reactive oxygen species (ROS) during LM infection, resulting in enhanced bacterial
clearance. p40phox, a member of NADPH oxidase subunits, was also reported to be
induced by the AHR [93]. Bessede et
al. [7] studied the roles of AHR and
tryptophan catabolism in primary LPS responsiveness and in the induction of endotoxin
tolerance. They showed that the hypersensitivity to a primary LPS challenge was mitigated
by the AHR activity through TDO2-dependent Kyn production. In contrast, endotoxin
tolerance required the combined effects of AHR, IDO1, and TGFβ. This protective,
LPS-triggered tolerance was not restricted to immunopathology induced by LPS or
Gram-negative bacteria, but it also specifically targeted inflammatory cytokine production
in a Streptococcus-induced multifocal septic arthritis model. Moura-Alves
et al. [62] demonstrated that
AHR senses multiple bacterial virulence factors from pulmonary pathogens, including
phenazines produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and naphthoquinone
phthiocol from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Upon ligand binding, AHR
activation regulates cytokine and chemokine production and leads to virulence factor
degradation, inducing the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes such as CYP1A1 and
CY1B1. In Ahr-deficient mice, infection with P.
aeruginosa induced more aggressive disease characteristics and
increased bacterial load compared with in wild-type mice.
AHR in the adaptive immune system
Regulatory T cells (Treg) and Th17 cells are newly identified subpopulations
of CD4+ T lymphocytes defined by the expression of FOXP3 and RORγt
transcription factors, respectively. Th17 cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines such as
IL-17 and IL-22, which are implicated in autoimmune conditions including multiple
sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis [53]. The
production of TGFβ and IL-10 family anti-inflammatory cytokines prevents the development
of autoimmune diseases in part by increasing Treg polarization. The functions
of the AHR in CD4+ naïve T cell differentiation have been extensively studied
[46, 76,
92]. These studies show a reciprocal relationship
between the production of Th17 and Treg cells. While TGFβ1 in
combination of IL-6 boosts the differentiation of Th17 cells, TGFβ1 alone
induces the differentiation of Treg cells from CD4+ naïve T cells
under T cell differentiation conditions. AHR expression is remarkably accelerated in the
induced Th17 cells, with approximately 10-fold higher expression than in the induced
Treg cells. Ligand-activated AHR binds to STAT1 and STAT5, transcription
factors that suppresses Th17 generation, suggesting that the AHR may regulate the
generation of Th17 cells by modifying the activity of these two STATs [46]. AHR activation by TCDD induces Treg
cells, which in turn suppresses experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model
of multiple sclerosis, by a TGFβ1-dependent mechanism. Conversely, AHR
activation by FICZ interferes with Treg cell differentiation and boosts Th17
cell differentiation, resulting in worsening EAE [76, 77, 92]. The promoter of the Foxp3 gene contains functional XREs,
and ChIP analysis revealed that TCDD-activated AHR was recruited to the
Foxp3 promoter [76].
TCDD-dependent Foxp3 gene induction may also occur via
epigenetic regulation [85]. Thus, the AHR activity
is a critical regulator of T cell differentiation, particularly of the balance between
Th17 and Treg cells, depending on the presence of specific ligands and the
cytokine milieu. Moreover, lack of the AHR specifically in T cells suppresses Th17 cell
generation and collagen-induced arthritis development [66].While both Th1 and Th2 cells are CD4+ helper T cells, there are fundamental
differences between these two cell types [29]. Th1
cells mainly secrete interferon (INF)-γ, a cytokine that promotes the differentiation of
CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), thereby providing effective cellular
immunity against intracellular pathogens. In contrast, Th2 cells produce cytokines such as
IL-4 and IL-5, leading to an IgE-mediated humoral immune response against extracellular
pathogens. The AHR signaling pathway activated by M50354, an active metabolite of an
anti-allergic agent, M50367, skews the Th1/Th2 balance toward Th1 cell dominance,
resulting in immunological responses with anti-allergic effects [67]. In addition, type 1 regulatory T cells (Tr1 cells) that produce
IL-10 are instrumental in the prevention of tissue inflammation, autoimmunity, and
graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). During T cell activation under Tr1-skewing conditions,
ligand-activated AHR, induced by IL-27, physically associated in synergy with the master
transcription factor c-MAF and transactivated the Il10 and
Il21 promoters, resulting in development of Tr1 cells and amelioration
of EAE [2]. A recent report by Gagliani et
al. [24] suggested that Th17 cells can
transdifferentiate into Tr1 cells during resolution of inflammation by a change in
signature transcription profile and acquisition of potent regulatory capacity. This study
also revealed a role for canonical TGFβ and for the AHR signaling pathways in conversion.
These results suggest that Th17 cell phenotype instability and plasticity may present a
therapeutic opportunity for treatment of inflammatory diseases.Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is an immunosuppressive enzyme, conserved throughout
the past ~600 MYA [98], that catalyzes the rate
limiting step of tryptophan catabolism in the kynurenine pathway [56]. IDO is present in subsets of dendritic cells and is thought to be
a central effector of Treg generation from naïve T cells by dendritic cell-T
cell interactions based on the following observations [57]: 1) Exposure of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) to TCDD
increases IDO mRNA in an AHR-dependent manner, 2) induced IDO promotes generation of the
endogenous AHR agonist kynurenine (Kyn), 3) Kyn directly activates the AHR and induces
generation of FOXP3+ Treg cells in an AHR-dependent manner, 4)
TGFβ1 upregulates the AHR expression, further potentiating the transcription
activation of the XRE-dependent genes by Kyn, and 5) Kyn does not lead to Th17 cell
generation. Importantly, the AHR and IDO/TDO are closely interconnected; AHR regulates
IDO/TDO expression, and Kyn produced by IDO/TDO is an AHR agonist. Absence of the AHR in
BMDCs inhibited Treg development, facilitated Th17 generation from naïve T
cells, and promoted naïve T cell proliferation [68].
AHR in gut immunity
On the gut mucosal surfaces, constant integration of dietary and microbial signals is
required for the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis [33], and disturbance of this process increases susceptibility to intestinal
infections, inflammatory bowel diseases, and inflammation-induced cancers. Innate lymphoid
cells (ILCs) and intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) are two predominant cell types in the
mucosal immune system. ILC populations are classified into three subsets (ILC1, 2, and 3)
that serve distinct roles in the immune response [91]. Among them, ILC3 cells, which express the transcription factor RORγt and
produce IL-17 and IL-22, induce the postnatal formation of intestinal lymphoid follicles
and regulate intestinal homeostasis. These RORγt+ ILCs express AHR, which is
required for the postnatal expansion of intestinal RORγt+ ILCs and the
formation of intestinal lymphoid follicles [47,
49]. The AHR activity within RORγt+
ILCs can be induced by dietary ligands such as those found in cruciferous vegetables.
Production of IL-22 was reduced dramatically in Ahr-deficient mice,
reflecting a marked decrease in RORγt+ ILC number that eventually resulted in a
high susceptibility to Citrobacter rodentiuminfection. Direct
interaction between RORγt and AHR cooperatively promoted expression of IL-22 [75], a cytokine important for defense against
pathogenic intestinal infections.IELs are an important first line of defense and contribute to both epithelial barrier
organization and wound repair. In the gut, IELs consist of distinct subpopulations
according to expression of T cell receptor TCRγδ or TCRαβCD8 αα+. Li et
al. [50] showed that the AHR is crucial
for maintaining the IEL number in the intestine, as AHR deficiency or lack of an AHR
ligand compromised the maintenance of IELs and the control of the microbial load and
composition, resulting in heightened immune activation and increased vulnerability to
epithelial damage. AHR activity can be regulated by dietary-derived compounds, such as
those present in cruciferous vegetables, providing a mechanistic link between dietary
compounds, the intestinal immune system, and the microbiota.The vertebrate intestine is colonized by hundreds of distinct species of microorganisms
that have mutually beneficial relationships with their host animals. Intestinal microbiota
are known to influence the development and balance of the host immune system. Recent
reports have shown that segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) are localized in the terminal
ileum and cecum of mice and induce pro-inflammatory Th17 cells [40]. Alternatively, Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa
are most abundant in the cecum and proximal colon and are strongly associated with the
distribution of Treg cells [3]. Zelante
et al. [98] showed that a subset
of commensal Lactobacilli utilizes tryptophan (Trp) as an energy source
and produces indole-3-aldehyde (IAld) as a metabolite. IAld activated AHR to enhance the
expression of IL-22 in ILC3s, which in turn stimulated epithelial cells to produce
antimicrobial proteins, including REGIIIγ, lipocalin, and calprotectin. As a result,
Candida albicans colonization was reduced, possibly because of its
susceptibility to antimicrobial protein-mediated growth inhibition. Qiu et
al. [74] showed that AHR expression in
innate ILC3s plays a protective role in T cell-mediated experimental colitis by
suppressing pathogenic Th17 cells, suggesting that the intricate balance between ILCs and
Th17 cells is regulated by the AHR and commensal flora. These two studies provide
mechanistic insights into functional interactions between commensal microbes and innate
lymphoid cells mediated by the AHR [5].We previously reported that Ahr-deficient mice develop cecal tumors with
aberrant accumulation of β-catenin and severe inflammation [42] and that both germ-free (GF)Ahr-deficient mice and
compound mutant mice lacking genes for AHR and ASC show markedly reduced tumor development
compared to Ahr-deficient mice [38]. AHR-dependent degradation of β-catenin was induced by dietary AHR ligands
such as I3C and DIM, which suppressed tumor development in the small intestine of
Apc mice [42].
A recent report by Park et al. showed that FICZ also promotes β-catenin
degradation in crypt cells [71]. From these
results, it is suggested that the AHR plays dual roles in tumor suppression in the
intestine by acting as a regulator of β-catenin and as an inhibitor of inflammation.
AHR in Stem Cell Maintenance and Cell Differentiation
AHR in hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and differentiation
Several lines of evidence support the suggestion that the AHR is important for
hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) regulation and function [84]. Further evidence suggests that AHR expression is necessary for the proper
maintenance of quiescence in HSCs and that AHR downregulation allows HSCs to escape from
quiescence and subsequently proliferate. Boitano et al. [9] identified a purine derivative, StemRegenin 1 (SR1),
which acts as an AHR antagonist to promote expansion of CD34+ cells ex
vivo. Culture of HSCs with SR1 led to a 50-fold increase in cells expressing
CD34+ and a 17-fold increase in cells retaining compatibility for engraftment
in immunodeficientmice. Wagner et al. [94] showed the feasibility and safety of SR1-treated HSCs for transplantation
and observed marked expansion of CD34+ cells with absence of graft failure and
enhanced hematopoietic recovery. SR1 treatment of isolated CD34 progenitor cells also led
to an enriched CD34+CD41low fraction with an increased capacity to
generate proplatelet-producing megakaryocytes and platelet-like elements similar to
circulating platelets [90]. In addition, Rentas
et al. [78] showed that the
RNA-binding protein Musashi-2 mediates the posttranscriptional downregulation of the AHR
complex components in human HSPCs and progenitor cells, resulting in reduction of the
capacity of AHR signaling to expand human HSCs and progenitor cells. Pabst et
al. [69] identified a new pyrimidoindole
compound, UM729, that cooperates with SR1, a known AHR antagonist, in more efficiently
preventing AML cell differentiation. Since UM729 lacks AHR suppressor activity, these
results suggest that at least two different pathways contribute to the maintenance of
leukemia stem cell activity ex vivo.In 1995, our group provided the first report implicating the AHR in cell differentiation.
Studies using phorbol ester as an inducer revealed that differentiation of promyelocytic
HL-60 and erythroblastic HEL cells to monocytes increased the levels of transcriptionally
active AHR [31]. Retinoic acid (RA)-induced
differentiation of HL-60 depends on the AHR and its ability to downregulate the stem cell
factor OCT4 [11]. Further, the AHR directs
hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion and differentiation [87]. Several lines of evidence have suggested possible reciprocal
suppression in the expression between Ahr and Oct4
genes. Ko et al. [48] showed that
interactions between OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, and polycomb group (PcG) proteins at the
Ahr promoter lead to repression of the AHR expression in pluripotent
embryonic stem (ES) cells, while during differentiation, the AHR expression was activated
by reversal of repressive marks in Ahr promoter chromatin, release of the
pluripotency factors and PcG proteins, binding of SP factors, establishment of histone
marks of open chromatin, and subsequently, recruitment of active RNA polymerase II. On the
other hand, Cheng et al. [15]
demonstrated that the tryptophan derivative ITE enhanced binding of the AHR to the
Oct4 gene promoter to suppress Oct4 transcription.
Reduction of ITE levels in cancer cells by tryptophan deprivation or hypoxia led to OCT4
elevation, which was reversed by addition of synthetic ITE. Consequently, synthetic ITE
induced the differentiation of stem-like cancer cells and reduced their tumorigenic
potential.Morales-Hernandez et al. [61]
showed that differentiation of the pluripotent embryonic teratocarcinomaNTERA-2 with RA
produced a marked increase in AHR expression. This increase activated the transcription of
Alu retrotransposons located within the Oct4 and
Nanog promoters harboring XRE and RNA polymerase III binding sites in
the differentiated carcinoma cells. Noncoding RNA transcripts produced from these
Alu retrotransposons may repress Oct4 and
Nanog expression through the miRNA pathway. Thus, it is suggested that
the transcripts produced from AHR-regulated Alu may control the
retrotransposons expression of Oct4 and Nanog during
differentiation of carcinoma cells. On the other hand, miR-302 is highly expressed in ES
cells [35] and has the pivotal role in the
maintenance of pluripotency and the cell reprogramming process. Hu et al.
[36] found that an anti-allergy drug, tranilast,
which is an AHR agonist, promotes miR-302 expression in an XRE-dependent manner.
Sustaining miR-302 expression supported pluripotency of mouse ES cells due to increased
expression of pluripotency genes, such as Oct4 and
Nanog, and reduced expression of differentiation marker genes involving
Fgf5 and Gata4. Furthermore, tranilast and other AHR
agonists promoted somatic cell reprogramming through AHR-mediated miR-302 expression.
AHR in homeostatic function and TCDD-mediated diseases
Increasing evidence indicates that AHR has physiological functions in maintenance of
cellular homeostasis that do not require activation by xenobiotics. Thus, the AHR
activation by environmental chemicals, such as TCDD, may be expected to disrupt cell
differentiation and homeostasis. In fact, genome-wide expression profiling during
differentiation of mouse ES cells into cardiomyocytes revealed that TCDD-driven AHR
activation during the early stages maintained the pro-proliferative state of ES cells and
inhibited differentiation [95]. In addition, Wang
et al. [96] also reported that
TCDD exposure during the initial differentiation stages of mouse embryo cells (the period
of panmesoderm development) disrupted the TGFβ/BMP and WNT signaling pathways essential
for cardiac development. Further, cardiomyocyte contractility was a stage-specific
AHR-dependent TCDD target, and TCDD-induced impairment of contractility was successfully
reversed by addition of BMP4, WNT3a, or WNT5a during the first 3 days of differentiation
in culture. Carreira et al. [13]
showed that disruption of AHR signaling during mouse development leads to abnormal cardiac
structure and function in the adult mouse and also suggested [14] that the AHR signaling in the developing mammalian heart is crucial
for cellular metabolism and cardiac function, as it regulates mitochondrial structure and
function. Identification of the critical window of developmental exposure to an
environmental toxicant is of extreme importance for our understanding of the health
outcome resulting from such an exposure.The epidermis is maintained by a multipotent stem cell population, located in the bulge
region of the basal layer, that gives rise to cells of different fates, including those
forming hair follicles, interfollicular epidermis, and associated glands such as sebaceous
glands. The proto-oncogene c-MYC, which stimulates stem cell exit from quiescence and
transformation to proliferating sebocyte progenitors [8], can divert epidermal stem cells to a sebaceous gland fate at the expense of
hair follicles [32]. B lymphocyte maturation
protein 1 (Blimp 1) is expressed in a population of cells that act as unipotent precursors
of proliferative sebocytes, which in turn differentiate into lipid-containing sebocytes
[34]. Blimp 1 represses expression of c-MYC in
sebocyte progenitor cells and regulates the size and number of cells within the gland.
Chloracne, a severe and persistent skin disease, is the hallmark of TCDD-mediated toxicity
[53]. TCDD is known to accumulate persistently in
sebum, and we showed that AHR expression in the sebaceous gland co-localized with Blimp 1.
Expression of Blimp 1 was induced by the AHR ligand MC and by UVB treatment both in
sebocyte (SZ95) and keratinocyte (HaCaT) cell lines, although its expression was
AHR/ARNT-dependent but XRE-independent [39]. In
addition, TCDD treatment of SZ95 cells led to sebocyte atrophy and increased
keratinocyte-like differentiation [41]. Taken
together, sustained AHR activation dysregulates sebaceous gland homeostasis, leading to
exhaustion of stem/progenitors and apoptosis of sebocytes, as evidenced by the
consequences of severe dioxinpoisoning [70].The rapid turnover of the intestinal epithelium (3–5 days) is supported by stem cells
located around the base of the crypt. Genetic inducible fate mapping studies have
identified two principal epithelial stem cell populations, the LGR5-expressing crypt base
columnar cells (CBCs) that facilitate homeostatic self-renewal and cells localized at or
near the +4 cell position that mediate injury-induced regeneration [97]. However, the relative functions of these two stem cell populations
and their interrelationships are not well understood [4]. Since AHR has important roles in maintenance of cellular homeostasis, it is
of interest to investigate its function in intestinal epithelial regeneration. In this
context, we showed AHR expression in Paneth cells of the mouse small intestine and ileum
[42], while Park et al. showed
its localization in LGR5+ CBCs [71].
Paneth cells are interspersed between CBCs and serve as multifunctional guardians of stem
cells, both by secreting anti-microbial products and constituting the niche for
LGR5+ stem cells [80]. Two recent
studies suggested a critical function for immune cells expressing the AHR in crypt
homeostasis. ILC3s are crucial for maintaining gastrointestinal integrity and barrier
function, and Lindemans et al. [51] found that IL-22, produced by combined AHR and RORγt activation in ILC3s after
intestinal injury, promoted intestinal stem cell-mediated epithelial regeneration. Using
ex vivo organoid cultures, they showed that ILC3s increase the growth
of mouse small intestine organoids in an IL-22-dependent fashion. Chng et
al. [16] reported that
Cre-mediated deletion of the Ahr gene in
CD11c-expressing dendritic cells was associated not only with aberrant mucosal immunity
but also altered epithelial morphogenesis. These findings reveal a fundamental mechanism
by which the immune cell system is involved in regeneration of the intestinal epithelium.
Further investigations into the roles of the AHR in intestinal homeostasis are
awaited.The AHR was first identified by Poland and his colleagues over 40 years ago as a
TCDD-binding cytosolic receptor controlling induction of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase.
However, substantial progress in the studies on the physiological functions of the AHR was
not been made until cDNA cloning and elucidation of the primary sequence of the AHR were
reported in 1992. Since then, an explosive increase of evidence has been reported
indicating that AHR plays multiple physiological roles in host defense and homeostasis,
including immunity, stem cell maintenance, and cell differentiation, as a mediator of
newly defined dietary, cellular, and microbe-derived ligands (Fig. 2). In addition, AHR interacts with a multitude of diverse signaling pathways in
cells, such as those of regulating cell proliferation and the cell cycle, cell morphology,
cell adhesion, and cell migration [63]. Thus, AHR
is now considered to function as an environmental sensor, connecting external
environmental signals to internal cellular responses.
Fig. 2.
The AHR functions as a pivotal sensor connecting external and internal
environments. AHR is involved in drug metabolism, carcinogenesis, and toxicities of
classical ligands, such as TCDD and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, while it
mediates important functions for development, host defense, and homeostasis,
including stem cell maintenance, cell differentiation, and immunity, using newly
defined ligands from dietary, cellular, and microbe-derived products.
The AHR functions as a pivotal sensor connecting external and internal
environments. AHR is involved in drug metabolism, carcinogenesis, and toxicities of
classical ligands, such as TCDD and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, while it
mediates important functions for development, host defense, and homeostasis,
including stem cell maintenance, cell differentiation, and immunity, using newly
defined ligands from dietary, cellular, and microbe-derived products.The AHR is an important bHLH-PAS transcription factor not only in innate and adaptive
immunity but also in gut immune responses (Fig.
3). AHR activation suppresses the expression of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6
and IL-1β, to protect against persistent inflammation. AHR is also involved in LM
clearance by inducing AIM and ROS production, in tolerance to LPS shock by interacting
with TDO2/IDO1, and in pathogen virulence factor degradation. Importantly, AHR regulates
naïve T cell differentiation, thereby controlling the balance of pro-inflammatory Th17
cells and anti-inflammatory Treg cells in a specific cytokine milieus. The AHR
also participates in Tr1 cell differentiation in conjunction with c-MAF and mediates Th17
cell transdifferentiation into regulatory T cells during resolution of inflammation. TCDD
exposure causes profound suppression of immune activity, mainly due to AHR/IDO1
axis-derived Treg generation and IL-10 expression. In mucosal immune responses,
AHR expressed by ILC3s participates in postnatal formation of intestinal lymphoid
follicles and gut homeostasis, while AHR in IELs regulates cell number and microbial load
control. In the intestines, particular commensal bacteria, SFB, induce pro-inflammatory
Th17 cells, while Clostridia associate with Treg cells.
Commensal Lactobacilli utilize tryptophan as an energy source and produce
an AHR ligand, Iald, as a metabolite, resulting in AHR activation and IL-22 expression in
ILC3s. In turn, IL-22 induces anti-microbial proteins that control bacterial infections.
Thus, the AHR functions in host defense not only via drug metabolism of
external chemicals but also by prevention of bacterial infection at multiple steps in the
infection process. Deeper mechanistic insights into the functional association between
commensal microbes and immune cells through AHR activation are expected. Furthermore,
identification and characterization of dietary, endogenous, and microbe-derived AHR
ligands will promote the discovery of novel therapeutics targeting the AHR pathway.
Fig. 3.
Roles of the AHR in gut immunity. A mechanistic link between AHR ligands, the gut
immune system, and the microbiota. SFB, segmented filamentous bacteria; SAA, serum
amyloid A; SFF, spore-forming fraction; DCs, dendritic cells; ILC3, group 3 innate
lymphoid cells; IEL, intraepithelial lymphocytes; IDO, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase;
TLR, toll-like receptor; Th17, IL-17-producing T helper cells; Treg,
regulatory T cells; ROR-γt, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor γt;
FOXP3, forkhead box P3; I3C, indole-3-carbinol; Kyn, kynurenine. See text for
details.
Roles of the AHR in gut immunity. A mechanistic link between AHR ligands, the gut
immune system, and the microbiota. SFB, segmented filamentous bacteria; SAA, serum
amyloid A; SFF, spore-forming fraction; DCs, dendritic cells; ILC3, group 3 innate
lymphoid cells; IEL, intraepithelial lymphocytes; IDO, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase;
TLR, toll-like receptor; Th17, IL-17-producing T helper cells; Treg,
regulatory T cells; ROR-γt, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor γt;
FOXP3, forkhead box P3; I3C, indole-3-carbinol; Kyn, kynurenine. See text for
details.Another recent discovery is the importance of the AHR in regulation of cell pluripotency
and differentiation. The finding indicating that an AHR antagonist SR1 promotes HSCs
expansion ex vivo suggests that AHR is necessary for proper maintenance
of quiescence in HSCs. Involvement of AHR in maintenance of HSCs was further confirmed by
different AHR antagonists and by downregulation of HSP90, a component of the AHR complex.
An interesting possibility is reciprocal suppression in the expression of
Ahr and Oct4 genes. In addition, AHR-directed
transcripts of Alu retrotransposons or miR-302 may regulate the
expression of pluripotent factors. The AHR also regulates organogenesis and tissue repair
by controlling cell differentiation, such as cardiac and sebocyte differentiation.
Cardiomyocyte contractility is a stage-specific AHR-dependent TCDD target, and disruption
of AHR signaling during development leads to abnormal cardiac structure and function.
Sustained activation of the AHR by TCDD dysregulates sebaceous gland homeostasis and leads
to TCDD-induced chloracne. Taken together, a myriad of deficits induced by disruption of
AHR signaling implicates this receptor in multiple developmental, physiological, and
pathophysiological processes and underscores the therapeutic potential of drugs targeting
AHR-associated pathways.
Authors: Anthony E Boitano; Jian Wang; Russell Romeo; Laure C Bouchez; Albert E Parker; Sue E Sutton; John R Walker; Colin A Flaveny; Gary H Perdew; Michael S Denison; Peter G Schultz; Michael P Cooke Journal: Science Date: 2010-08-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: John E Wagner; Claudio G Brunstein; Anthony E Boitano; Todd E DeFor; David McKenna; Darin Sumstad; Bruce R Blazar; Jakub Tolar; Chap Le; Julie Jones; Michael P Cooke; Conrad C Bleul Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2015-12-05 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Daniel J Kim; Arvind Venkataraman; Priyanka Caroline Jain; Eleanor P Wiesler; Melody DeBlasio; Jonathan Klein; Stephanie S Tu; Seohyuk Lee; Ruslan Medzhitov; Akiko Iwasaki Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Erika L Garcia-Villatoro; Jennifer A A DeLuca; Evelyn S Callaway; Kimberly F Allred; Laurie A Davidson; Martha E Hensel; Rani Menon; Ivan Ivanov; Stephen H Safe; Arul Jayaraman; Robert S Chapkin; Clinton D Allred Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Jennifer K Heppert; James M Davison; Cecelia Kelly; Gilberto Padilla Mercado; Colin R Lickwar; John F Rawls Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 46.802