Literature DB >> 27980279

Shock Index More Sensitive Than Cardiogenic Shock in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Veemal V Hemradj1, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Menko Jan de Boer, Harry Suryapranata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but there is evidence that shock index (SI), taking into account both blood pressure and heart rate, is a more sensitive and powerful predictor. We investigated the independent impact of SI and CS on 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients with STEMI, treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and 
Results: In 7,412 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI, the predictive value of either SI or CS on 1-year mortality was assessed. Best cut-off value of SI, determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, was 0.7, with an ROC AUC of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.65-0.67), compared with an ROC AUC of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.59-0.61) for CS (P<0.001). At admission, 387 patients (5.2%) had CS and 1,567 patients (21.1%) had SI ≥0.7. The adjusted hazard ratio of mortality in patients with SI ≥0.7 and in CS patients was, respectively, 3.3 (95% CI: 2.4-4.6) and 3.1 (95% CI: 2.1-4.6) after 30 days, and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.8-2.9) and 3.1 (95% CI: 2.2-4.2) after 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: SI identifies more patients with increased risk of mortality, and seems to be a more sensitive prognostic predictor than CS in patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27980279     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  8 in total

1.  Asymptomatic Hypotension in a Patient with Catheter-related Right Atrial Thrombus.

Authors:  Hillary E Davis; Michael Lu; Scott J Cameron; Ryan Bodkin
Journal:  Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med       Date:  2018-01-09

2.  Derivation and Validation of Shock Index as a parameter for Predicting Long-term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Tongtong Yu; Chunyang Tian; Jia Song; Dongxu He; Zhijun Sun; Zhaoqing Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparison of shock index-based risk indices for predicting in-hospital outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Guoyu Wang; Ruzhu Wang; Ling Liu; Jing Wang; Lei Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Shock index and modified shock index are predictors of long-term mortality not only in STEMI but also in NSTEMI patients.

Authors:  Timo Schmitz; Eva Harmel; Jakob Linseisen; Inge Kirchberger; Margit Heier; Annette Peters; Christa Meisinger
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 4.709

5.  Modified Shock Index as Simple Clinical Independent Predictor of In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Miftah Pramudyo; Vani Marindani; Chaerul Achmad; Iwan Cahyo Santosa Putra
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-09

6.  Novel scoring system based on clinical examination for prediction of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Miftah Pramudyo; Transiska Liesmadona Bijaksana; Achmad Fauzi Yahya; Iwan Cahyo Santosa Putra
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-10

7.  Clinical Validation of the Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, Delta Shock Index, and Shock Index-C for Emergency Department ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Charng-Yen Chiang; Chien-Fu Lin; Peng-Huei Liu; Fu-Cheng Chen; I-Min Chiu; Fu-Jen Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  The value of shock index in prediction of cardiogenic shock developed during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Zhonghai Wei; Jian Bai; Qing Dai; Han Wu; Shuaihua Qiao; Biao Xu; Lian Wang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.