| Literature DB >> 27980257 |
Ayako Doi1, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Yuko Omori, Yumiko Oyamada, Koki Kumano, Naohito Yoshizaki, Michiaki Hirayama, Yoshinori Suzuki, Syunichi Okushiba, Takahiro Kogawa, Toshihiko Doi, Hitoshi Kondo.
Abstract
A 56-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a growing gastric submucosal tumor. An upper endoscopic examination revealed two gastric tumors, an original polypoid tumor and a newly diagnosed superficial tumor. Boring biopsied specimens of the submucosal tumor showed gastric plasmacytoma; however, the other specimens showed no malignancy. Blood diseases were ruled out using various examinations; therefore, we diagnosed the tumor as extramedullary gastric plasmacytoma. The patient underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, and both tumors were thus revealed to be plasmacytomas. We experienced a rare case with two differently shaped extramedullary gastric plasmacytomas without significant morphologic change during the follow-up.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27980257 PMCID: PMC5283957 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.6889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.271
Figure 1.a: Endoscopic findings in 2005 revealed an elevated lesion resembling a submucosal tumor with slight depression on the posterior wall of the middle body. b: Endoscopic findings in 2009 showed no change in the tumor size or shape. c: Endoscopic findings in 2010 showed a marked tumor growth and central depression. d: Endoscopic findings in 2011 showed tumor growth with a reddish appearance and a styloid form of the tumor root and deeper depression at the center.
Figure 2.a: An endoscopic examination revealed an elevated lesion, similar to a submucosal tumor, with erosion on the posterior wall of the middle body. b: A retroflexion picture of a showed a styloid form of the tumor root. c: An endoscopic examination revealed a distinct elevated lesion with a depressed area on the lesser curvature of the middle body (arrows). d: A retroflecion image of c showed an erythrogenic tumor without ulcerative change (arrows).
Figure 3.Histological findings of the resected specimen revealed diffuse proliferation of the plasmacytoid cells with Dutcher bodies. a: A histological examination of the biopsied samples taken from superficial type plasmacytoma [Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining, 400×]. b: A histological examination of biopsied samples taken from nodular/SMT type plasmacytoma (H&E staining, 400×). c: Immunohistochemistry of b showing positivity for Kappa chains in tumor cells (immunoperoxidase stain, 400×). d: Immunohistochemistry of b showing positivity for IgA chains in tumor cells (immunoperoxidase stain, 400×). e: A high-power field of a represents Dutcher bodies (arrow) (H&E staining, 400×).
Reported Cases of Gastric Plasmacytoma in Japan (depth ≤ sm).
| Reference | Age | Sex | Pre. Dx | Type | Depth | Ig | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 41 | F | Ca | n | sm | 36 m alive | |
| 4 | 33 | M | RLH | s | sm | alive | |
| 5 | 28 | M | Ca | s | sm | 19 m alive | |
| 4 | 78 | F | Ca | u | sm | 18 m alive | |
| 4 | 38 | M | PL | s | m | IgA | alive |
| 4 | 46 | M | PL | s | sm | κ | alive |
| 4 | 16 | F | ML | u | sm | IgM-λ | alive |
| 4 | 50 | M | PL | s | m | IgA-λ | 8 m alive |
| 4 | 81 | F | PL | s | m | IgM-λ | alive |
| 4 | 40 | F | ML | s | sm | IgM-κ | 20 m alive |
| 4 | 35 | M | ML | u | m | IgM-λ | |
| 4 | 60 | F | ML | s | sm | IgM-κ | 24 m alive |
| 4 | 63 | F | PL | s | sm | IgA-λ | |
| 4 | 73 | F | PL | s | sm | IgA-κ | |
| 4 | 61 | F | PL | u | sm | IgM-λ | 12 m alive |
| 4 | 81 | F | PL | s | m | IgA-κ | 13 m alive |
| 4 | 61 | F | PL | p | m | IgM-κ | 26 m alive |
| 4 | 61 | F | PL | s | sm | IgM-κ | |
| 4 | 53 | F | PL | s | sm | IgM-λ | |
| 4 | 60 | M | PL | s | m | IgM-λ | 25 m alive |
| 4 | 39 | M | SMT | n | sm | IgG-κ | 16 m alive |
| 4 | 51 | F | PL | s | m | IgM-κ | 6 m alive |
| 4 | 67 | F | PL | s | sm | IgM-λ | |
| 4 | 42 | M | Ca | n | sm | IgM-λ | |
| 4 | 67 | F | PL | s | sm | IgM-λ | |
| 4 | 59 | M | PL | s | m | IgM-λ | 18 m alive |
| 4 | 48 | M | PL | s | sm | IgG-κ | |
| 4 | 73 | F | PL | n | sm | IgG,A-κ | 24 m alive |
| 4 | 40 | F | Ca | s | sm | IgG-λ | 10 m alive |
| 4 | 56 | M | PL | s | m | IgM-κ | |
| 4 | 61 | F | PL | s | m | IgM-κ | |
| 4 | 39 | M | PL | u | sm | IgM-λ | alive |
| 4 | 65 | F | PL | s | sm | IgA-λ | alive |
| 4 | 49 | M | PL | s | sm | IgA-κ | |
| 6 | 54 | F | SMT | n | sm | IgM-κ | 20 m alive |
| 7 | 34 | F | PL | s | sm | IgM-κ | alive |
| 8 | 66 | F | PL | s | sm | IgM-λ | alive |
| 5 | 51 | F | PL | s | m | IgA-κ | |
| 5 | 55 | M | PL | s | sm | IgA-κ | alive |
| 9 | 51 | F | PL | s | m | IgM-κ | 6 m alive |
| 10 | 77 | M | PL | s | sm | IgA-κ | 12 m alive |
| 11 | 78 | F | PL | s | m | IgM-λ | 10 m alive |
| 12 | 77 | M | PL | u | sm | IgA-κ | 17 m alive |
| 13 | 57 | M | PL | p | m | IgA-λ | |
| 14 | 55 | F | Amy | s | m | IgM-λ | 67 m alive |
| 15 | 71 | M | PL | s | sm | IgA-λ | 13 Y alive |
| 16 | 62 | M | PL | s | m | IgA-κ | 6 m alive |
| 17 | 44 | M | PL | s | m | κ | |
| 18 | 49 | F | PL | s | sm | λ | 72 m alive |
| 19 | 66 | F | PL | s | m | λ | 38 m alive |
| Our case | 56 | F | PL | p, s | sm, m | IgA-κ | 42 m alive |
M: male, F: female, Pre Dx: prediagnosis, Ca: cancer, RLH: reactive lymphoreticular hyperplasia, SMT: submucosal tumor, ML: malignant lymphoma, PL: plasmacytoma, Amy: amyloidosis, n: nodular, u: ulcer, p: polypoid, s: superficial, m: mucosa, sm: submucosa