Literature DB >> 27979666

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Treatment with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization.

Juhua Xiao1, Zhen Shi2, Jinshui Zhou3, Jun Ye4, Jianfang Zhu3, Xin Zhou5, Fang Wang6, Shouhua Zhang7.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy compared with uterine artery embolization (UAE) and intra-arterial methotrexate infusion combined with uterine curettage. In this retrospective cohort study, 31 patients were treated with HIFU (HIFU group), and 45 patients were treated with UAE (UAE group). We compared the treatment and recovery of the patients, including follow-up. After UAE treatment, serum levels of the β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin declined significantly on the first day, and the residual lesions disappeared in 3-17 wk. One patient underwent hysterectomy; intrauterine adhesions were found by hysteroscopic examination after 6 mo in 2 patients, whose menstrual function did not return to normal. The remainder of the 42 patients recovered normal menstrual functioning during the 3- to 18-wk follow-up. In the patients who underwent HIFU treatment, serum β-HCG levels did not decline rapidly; serum β-HCG levels increased in many patients and then declined to normal steadily within 2-12 wk. Lesions detached in 3-14 wk in all patients, and menstrual functioning was recovered in 3-9 wk without uterine curettage. Compared with the UAE group, the HIFU group had less pain and fewer complications; the patients in the HIFU group were not hospitalized or anesthetized and had lower costs. HIFU is an efficient, tolerable and non-invasive treatment.
Copyright © 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar pregnancy; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Non-invasive treatment; Uterine artery embolization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27979666     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  3 in total

1.  HIFU Drive System Miniaturization Using Harmonic Reduced Pulsewidth Modulation.

Authors:  Chris Adams; Thomas M Carpenter; David Cowell; Steven Freear; James R McLaughlan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  The diagnostic value of 3.0T MRI in cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Shuning Guo; Haitao Wang; Xiuying Yu; Yang Yu; Chunguo Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Xi Xiong; Chun-Yan Gao; De-Mei Ying; Ping Yan; Zhi-Jia Zhang; Na Kuang; Hong-Ju Tian; Li Luo; Shu-Yu Long; Zheng-Qiong Chen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.161

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.