Literature DB >> 27979604

Differences in Behavior and Brain Activity during Hypothetical and Real Choices.

Colin Camerer1, Dean Mobbs2.   

Abstract

Real behaviors are binding consequential commitments to a course of action, such as harming another person, buying an Apple watch, or fleeing from danger. Cognitive scientists are generally interested in the psychological and neural processes that cause such real behavior. However, for practical reasons, many scientific studies measure behavior using only hypothetical or imagined stimuli. Generalizing from such studies to real behavior implicitly assumes that the processes underlying the two types of behavior are similar. We review evidence of similarity and differences in hypothetical and real mental processes. In many cases, hypothetical choice tasks give an incomplete picture of brain circuitry that is active during real choice.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  affective realism; choice; decision making; decision neuroscience; hypothetical bias; valuation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27979604      PMCID: PMC7769501          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  57 in total

1.  Neural valuation of environmental resources.

Authors:  Nik Sawe; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange.

Authors:  Brooks King-Casas; Damon Tomlin; Cedric Anen; Colin F Camerer; Steven R Quartz; P Read Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Hypothetical and real choice differentially activate common valuation areas.

Authors:  Min Jeong Kang; Antonio Rangel; Mickael Camus; Colin F Camerer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Are we more moral than we think? Exploring the role of affect in moral behavior and moral forecasting.

Authors:  Rimma Teper; Michael Inzlicht; Elizabeth Page-Gould
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03-17

6.  fMRI reactivity to high-calorie food pictures predicts short- and long-term outcome in a weight-loss program.

Authors:  Donna L Murdaugh; James E Cox; Edwin W Cook; Rosalyn E Weller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Individual differences in nucleus accumbens activity to food and sexual images predict weight gain and sexual behavior.

Authors:  Kathryn E Demos; Todd F Heatherton; William M Kelley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Cueing the personal future to reduce discounting in intertemporal choice: Is episodic prospection necessary?

Authors:  Donna Kwan; Carl F Craver; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Fuqiang Gao; Sandra E Black; R Shayna Rosenbaum
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Looming animate and inanimate threats: the response of the amygdala and periaqueductal gray.

Authors:  Dionne S Coker-Appiah; Stuart F White; Roberta Clanton; Jiongjong Yang; Alex Martin; R J R Blair
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Neural activity associated with monitoring the oscillating threat value of a tarantula.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Rongjun Yu; James B Rowe; Hannah Eich; Oriel FeldmanHall; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  20 in total

1.  Neural Correlates of Drug-Biased Choice in Currently Using and Abstinent Individuals With Cocaine Use Disorder.

Authors:  Scott J Moeller; Anna Zilverstand; Anna B Konova; Prantik Kundu; Muhammad A Parvaz; Rebecca Preston-Campbell; Keren Bachi; Nelly Alia-Klein; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-11-11

2.  Low Striatal Dopamine D2-type Receptor Availability is Linked to Simulated Drug Choice in Methamphetamine Users.

Authors:  Scott J Moeller; Kyoji Okita; Chelsea L Robertson; Michael E Ballard; Anna B Konova; Rita Z Goldstein; Mark A Mandelkern; Edythe D London
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  The real deal: Willingness-to-pay and satiety expectations are greater for real foods versus their images.

Authors:  Carissa A Romero; Michael T Compton; Yueran Yang; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Graspable Objects Grab Attention More Than Images Do.

Authors:  Michael A Gomez; Rafal M Skiba; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-12-07

Review 5.  Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Pete C Trimmer; Daniel T Blumstein; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 6.  Mentalizing during social InterAction: A four component model.

Authors:  Haiyan Wu; Xun Liu; Cindy C Hagan; Dean Mobbs
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Individual-specific mortality is associated with how individuals evaluate future discounting decisions.

Authors:  Anthony J Lee; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Finding the neural correlates of collaboration using a three-person fMRI hyperscanning paradigm.

Authors:  Hua Xie; Iliana I Karipidis; Amber Howell; Meredith Schreier; Kristen E Sheau; Mai K Manchanda; Rafi Ayub; Gary H Glover; Malte Jung; Allan L Reiss; Manish Saggar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Neuro-Computational Foundations of Moral Preferences.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ugazio; Marcus Grueschow; Rafael Polania; Claus Lamm; Philippe Tobler; Christian Ruff
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Human Responses to Visually Evoked Threat.

Authors:  Melis Yilmaz Balban; Erin Cafaro; Lauren Saue-Fletcher; Marlon J Washington; Maryam Bijanzadeh; A Moses Lee; Edward F Chang; Andrew D Huberman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.