Literature DB >> 27979086

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for meat analysis.

Burhanettin Yalçınkaya1, Eylem Yumbul2, Erkan Mozioğlu3, Muslum Akgoz3.   

Abstract

Preventing adulteration of meat and meat products with less desirable or objectionable meat species is important not only for economical, religious and health reasons, but also, it is important for fair trade practices, therefore, several methods for identification of meat and meat products have been developed. In the present study, ten different DNA extraction methods, including Tris-EDTA Method, a modified Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) Method, Alkaline Method, Urea Method, Salt Method, Guanidinium Isothiocyanate (GuSCN) Method, Wizard Method, Qiagen Method, Zymogen Method and Genespin Method were examined to determine their relative effectiveness for extracting DNA from meat samples. The results show that the salt method is easy to perform, inexpensive and environmentally friendly. Additionally, it has the highest yield among all the isolation methods tested. We suggest this method as an alternative method for DNA isolation from meat and meat products.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adulteration; Biometrology; Fluorometric analysis; Genomic DNA extraction; Meat and meat products; Spectrophotometric analysis; qPCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27979086     DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem        ISSN: 0308-8146            Impact factor:   7.514


  7 in total

1.  The Influence of DNA Extraction Methods on Species Identification Results of Seafood Products.

Authors:  Rosalía Rodríguez-Riveiro; Amaya Velasco; Carmen G Sotelo
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 2.  Point-of-Need DNA Testing for Detection of Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria.

Authors:  Jasmina Vidic; Priya Vizzini; Marisa Manzano; Devon Kavanaugh; Nalini Ramarao; Milica Zivkovic; Vasa Radonic; Nikola Knezevic; Ioanna Giouroudi; Ivana Gadjanski
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Improving sustainable use of genetic resources in biodiversity archives.

Authors:  E J Tuschhoff; Carl R Hutter; Richard E Glor
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Rapid Full-Cycle Technique to Control Adulteration of Meat Products: Integration of Accelerated Sample Preparation, Recombinase Polymerase Amplification, and Test-Strip Detection.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Ivanov; Demid S Popravko; Irina V Safenkova; Elena A Zvereva; Boris B Dzantiev; Anatoly V Zherdev
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy.

Authors:  Haoyi Xu; Hangzhen Lan; Daodong Pan; Junfeng Xu; Xiaofu Wang
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-05

6.  Insight into Rapid DNA-Specific Identification of Animal Origin Based on FTIR Analysis: A Case Study.

Authors:  Yahong Han; Lin Jian; Yumei Yao; Xinlei Wang; Lujia Han; Xian Liu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Association of IFNA16 and TNFRSF19 Polymorphisms with Intramuscular Fat Content and Fatty Acid Composition in Pigs.

Authors:  Supamit Mekchay; Nanthana Pothakam; Worrarak Norseeda; Pantaporn Supakankul; Tawatchai Teltathum; Guisheng Liu; Watcharapong Naraballobh; Trisadee Khamlor; Korawan Sringarm; Patcharin Krutmuang
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.