Literature DB >> 27979041

Acute cardioversion vs a wait-and-see approach for recent-onset symptomatic atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: Rationale and design of the randomized ACWAS trial.

Elton Dudink1, Brigitte Essers2, Wouter Holvoet3, Bob Weijs3, Justin Luermans1, Hemanth Ramanna4, Anho Liem5, Jurren van Opstal6, Lukas Dekker7, Vincent van Dijk8, Timo Lenderink9, Otto Kamp10, Lennert Kulker11, Michiel Rienstra12, Bas Kietselaer1, Marco Alings13, Jos Widdershoven14, Joan Meeder15, Martin Prins2, Isabelle van Gelder12, Harry Crijns16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current standard of care for patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in the emergency department aims at urgent restoration of sinus rhythm, although paroxysmal AF is a condition that resolves spontaneously within 24 hours in more than 70% of the cases. A wait-and-see approach with rate-control medication only and when needed cardioversion within 48 hours of onset of symptoms is hypothesized to be noninferior, safe, and cost-effective as compared with current standard of care and to lead to a higher quality of life.
DESIGN: The ACWAS trial (NCT02248753) is an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, 2-arm noninferiority trial that compares a wait-and-see approach to the standard of care. Consenting adults with recent-onset symptomatic AF in the emergency department without urgent need for cardioversion are eligible for participation. A total of 437 patients will be randomized to either standard care (pharmacologic or electrical cardioversion) or the wait-and-see approach, consisting of symptom reduction through rate control medication until spontaneous conversion is achieved, with the possibility of cardioversion within 48 hours after onset of symptoms. Primary end point is the presence of sinus rhythm on 12-lead electrocardiogram at 4 weeks; main secondary outcomes are adverse events, total medical and societal costs, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness for 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: The ACWAS trial aims at providing evidence for the use of a wait-and-see approach for patients with recent-onset symptomatic AF in the emergency department.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27979041     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  2 in total

1.  Is delayed cardioversion the better approach in recent-onset atrial fibrillation? Yes.

Authors:  Giovanni Luca Botto; Giovanni Tortora
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Impact of a Multidisciplinary Treatment Pathway for Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department on Hospital Admissions and Length of Stay: Results of a Multi-Center Study.

Authors:  Leon M Ptaszek; Christopher W Baugh; Steven A Lubitz; Jeremy N Ruskin; Grace Ha; Margaux Forsch; Samer A DeOliveira; Samia Baig; E Kevin Heist; Jason H Wasfy; David F Brown; Paul D Biddinger; Ali S Raja; Benjamin Scirica; Benjamin A White; Moussa Mansour
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 5.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.