Literature DB >> 27978765

A systematic review and checklist presenting the main challenges for health economic modeling in personalized medicine: towards implementing patient-level models.

Koen Degeling1, Hendrik Koffijberg1, Maarten J IJzerman1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ongoing development of genomic medicine and the use of molecular and imaging markers in personalized medicine (PM) has arguably challenged the field of health economic modeling (HEM). This study aims to provide detailed insights into the current status of HEM in PM, in order to identify if and how modeling methods are used to address the challenges described in literature. Areas covered: A review was performed on studies that simulate health economic outcomes for personalized clinical pathways. Decision tree modeling and Markov modeling were the most observed methods. Not all identified challenges were frequently found, challenges regarding companion diagnostics, diagnostic performance, and evidence gaps were most often found. However, the extent to which challenges were addressed varied considerably between studies. Expert commentary: Challenges for HEM in PM are not yet routinely addressed which may indicate that either (1) their impact is less severe than expected, (2) they are hard to address and therefore not managed appropriately, or (3) HEM in PM is still in an early stage. As evidence on the impact of these challenges is still lacking, we believe that more concrete examples are needed to illustrate the identified challenges and to demonstrate methods to handle them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27978765     DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1273110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  8 in total

Review 1.  Overview and Use of Tools for Selecting Modelling Techniques in Health Economic Studies.

Authors:  Huajie Jin; Stewart Robinson; Wenru Shang; Evanthia Achilla; David Aceituno; Sarah Byford
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Addressing Challenges of Economic Evaluation in Precision Medicine Using Dynamic Simulation Modeling.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Luiza R Grazziotin; Dean A Regier; Sarah Wordsworth; James Buchanan; Kathryn Phillips; Maarten Ijzerman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Guidance for the Harmonisation and Improvement of Economic Evaluations of Personalised Medicine.

Authors:  Heleen Vellekoop; Simone Huygens; Matthijs Versteegh; László Szilberhorn; Tamás Zelei; Balázs Nagy; Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova; Apostolos Tsiachristas; Sarah Wordsworth; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  How to Address Uncertainty in Health Economic Discrete-Event Simulation Models: An Illustration for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Isaac Corro Ramos; Martine Hoogendoorn; Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Health economic evidence for the use of molecular biomarker tests in hematological malignancies: A systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Vu; Koen Degeling; Ella R Thompson; Piers Blombery; David Westerman; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Accounting for parameter uncertainty in the definition of parametric distributions used to describe individual patient variation in health economic models.

Authors:  Koen Degeling; Maarten J IJzerman; Miriam Koopman; Hendrik Koffijberg
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  Emerging Use of Early Health Technology Assessment in Medical Product Development: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Maarten J IJzerman; Hendrik Koffijberg; Elisabeth Fenwick; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  James Love-Koh; Alison Peel; Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla; Kate Ennis; Rosemary Lovett; Andrea Manca; Anastasia Chalkidou; Hannah Wood; Matthew Taylor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.981

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.