Literature DB >> 27978595

Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

Khalid Benkhadra1,2, Fares Alahdab1,2, Shrikant Tamhane3, Zhen Wang1, Larry J Prokop4, Irl B Hirsch5, Denis Raccah6, Jean-Pierre Riveline7, Olga Kordonouri8, Mohammad Hassan Murad1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RTCGM) may help in the management of individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM); however, the evidence supporting its use is unclear. The available meta-analyses on this topic use aggregate data which weaken inference.
OBJECTIVE: Individual patient data were obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to conduct a meta-analysis and synthesize evidence about the effect of RTCGM on glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), hypoglycaemic events and time spent in hypoglycaemia in T1DM.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus through January 2015. We included RCTs that enrolled individuals with T1DM and compared RTCGM vs control group. A two-step regression model was used to pool individual patient data.
RESULTS: We included 11 RCTs at moderate risk of bias. Meta-analysis suggests that the use of RTCGM is associated with a statistically significant but modest reduction in HbA1c (-0·276; 95% confidence interval -0·465 to -0·087). The improvements in HbA1c were primarily seen in individuals over age 15 years. We were unable to identify a statistically significant difference in time spent in hypoglycaemia or the number of hypoglycaemic episodes although these analyses were imprecise and warrant lower confidence. There was no difference between males and females.
CONCLUSION: RTCGM in T1DM is associated with a reduction in HbA1c primarily in individuals over 15 years of age. We were unable to identify a statistically significant difference in the time spent in hypoglycaemia or the incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27978595     DOI: 10.1111/cen.13290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  11 in total

1.  REAL-WORLD IMPLICATIONS OF HYBRID CLOSE LOOP (HCL) INSULIN DELIVERY SYSTEM.

Authors:  Eileen R Faulds; Janet Zappe; Kathleen M Dungan
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Analysis of the ADA's Standard of Diabetes Care Recommendation for Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; Ana Brañez-Condorena; David R Soriano-Moreno; Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-29

3.  Type 1 Diabetes Management With Technology: Patterns of Utilization and Effects on Glucose Control Using Real-World Evidence.

Authors:  Ran Sun; Imon Banerjee; Shengtian Sang; Jennifer Joseph; Jennifer Schneider; Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2021-07

4.  Paediatric type 1 diabetes 2018: Clinical and research insights.

Authors:  Stephen J Zborovski; Farid H Mahmud
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Use of Personal Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device Is Associated With Reduced Risk of Hypoglycemia in a 16-Week Clinical Trial of People With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion.

Authors:  Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen; Peter Vestergaard; Irl B Hirsch; Ole Hejlesen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-18

6.  Level of Digitalization in Germany: Results of the Diabetes Digitalization and Technology (D.U.T) Report 2020.

Authors:  Timm Roos; Sabine Hochstadt; Winfried Keuthage; Jens Kröger; Andreas Lueg; Hansjörg Mühlen; Lisa Schütte; Nikolaus Scheper; Dominic Ehrmann; Norbert Hermanns; Lutz Heinemann; Bernhard Kulzer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-27

7.  Technological Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Study Type 1 Diabetes in Youth: Viewpoint of Methodologies.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Ray; Alana McMichael; Maria Rivera-Santana; Jacob Noel; Tamara Hershey
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2021-06-03

8.  Current Eligibility Requirements for CGM Coverage Are Harmful, Costly, and Unjustified.

Authors:  John E Anderson; James R Gavin; Davida F Kruger
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 9.  Current treatment options and challenges in patients with Type 1 diabetes: Pharmacological, technical advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Federico Boscari; Angelo Avogaro
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 6.514

10.  Use of FreeStyle Libre Flash Monitor Register in the Netherlands (FLARE-NL1): Patient Experiences, Satisfaction, and Cost Analysis.

Authors:  M J Fokkert; A Damman; P R van Dijk; M A Edens; S Abbes; J Braakman; R J Slingerland; L D Dikkeschei; J Dille; H J G Bilo
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.