Literature DB >> 27977741

Analysis of Sequence Variation and Risk Association of Human Papillomavirus 52 Variants Circulating in Korea.

Youn Jin Choi1, Eun Young Ki1, Chuqing Zhang2, Wendy C S Ho2, Sung-Jong Lee1, Min Jin Jeong1, Paul K S Chan2, Jong Sup Park1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Human papillomavirus (HPV) 52 is a carcinogenic, high-risk genotype frequently detected in cervical cancer cases from East Asia, including Korea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sequences of HPV52 detected in 91 cervical samples collected from women attending Seoul St. Mary's Hospital were analyzed. HPV52 genomic sequences were obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based sequencing and analyzed using Seq-Scape software, and phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA6 software.
RESULTS: Of the 91 cervical samples, 40 were normal, 22 were low-grade lesions, 21 were high-grade lesions and 7 were squamous cell carcinomas. Four HPV52 variant lineages (A, B, C and D) were identified. Lineage B was the most frequently detected lineage, followed by lineage C. By analyzing the two most frequently detected lineages (B and C), we found that distinct variations existed in each lineage. We also found that a lineage B-specific mutation K93R (A379G) was associated with an increased risk of cervical neoplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we are the first to reveal the predominance of the HPV52 lineages, B and C, in Korea. We also found these lineages harbored distinct genetic alterations that may affect oncogenicity. Our findings increase our understanding on the heterogeneity of HPV52 variants, and may be useful for the development of new diagnostic assays and therapeutic vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27977741      PMCID: PMC5158036          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the major causative agent of cervical cancer, a leading cause of death among women worldwide [1]. The virus genome is divided into three functional regions: an upstream regulatory region, an early region, and a late region. The upstream regulatory region is a non-coding region, referred as the long control region (LCR), which regulates transcriptional and replication activities. In comparison, the early and late regions are coding regions. Early regions (E1, E2, E4, E5, E6 and E7) encode for non-structural proteins while late regions (L1 and L2) encode for structural proteins [2]. HPV is markedly heterogeneous with more than 200 genotypes which are classified into types, lineages, and sub-lineages based on the L1 sequence. The L1 sequences among different types differ by at least 10%, and those of lineages differ by >1% [3, 4]. The persistence of HPV contributes to the progression of cervical infection to cervical cancer. In particular, oncogenicity varies according to the HPV genotype, as well as the lineage of some genotypes [4-6]. Eight most common high-risk HPV genotypes (HPV16, HPV18, HPV31, HPV33, HPV35, HPV45, HPV52 and HPV58) are responsible for 91% of cervical cancers [7, 8]. Of these, HPV52 is a high-risk genotype and one of the nine HPV types (HPV6, HPV11, HPV16, HPV18, HPV31, HPV33, HPV45, HPV52 and HPV58) targeted by the recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved HPV 9-valent vaccine [9]. Given that HPV52 is recognized as a high-risk genotype commonly found in cervical cancers from East Asia [10-12], we attempted to characterize HPV52 variants circulating in Korea and to investigate their association with cervical cancer development.

Materials and Methods

Cervical samples

Altogether, 91 cervical cytology/tissue samples that had tested positive for HPV52 were used for this study. These samples had been collected as part of the routine clinical management at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital (Seoul, Korea) and all were treatment-naive. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine and the participants provided written informed consent. Pathologic features of patients are summarized in Table 1. The quality of DNA extracted from cytology/tissue samples was assessed by amplifying a 932-bp fragment of the long-control region (LCR). The HPV genotype was ascertained by demonstrating a nucleotide sequence similarity of >90%, compared with the HPV52 prototype (GenBank accession no. X74481).
Table 1

Cervical pathologies of study subject.

Cervical pathologyNumber of subjects (percentage) (n = 91)LineagesMean age (years) (±SD)
A (n = 5)B (n = 79)C n = 6)D (n = 1)
Normal40 (44.0)3352040.2 (±9.6)
Low-grade lesions22 (24.2)2190139.6 (±10.7)
ASCUS2
LGSIL20
High-grade lesions21 (23.1)0174046.7 (±11.9)
HGSIL14
CIN34
CIS3
SCC7 (7.7)070057.6 (±18.0)
Unknown1 (1.1)0100

ASCUS: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; CIN3: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3; CIS: carcinoma in situ; LGSIL: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; HGSIL: high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma.

ASCUS: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; CIN3: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3; CIS: carcinoma in situ; LGSIL: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; HGSIL: high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma.

Nucleotide sequencing

E6, E7, L1 and LCR sequences were amplified with long- or short-fragment polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Long-fragment PCR was performed on good-quality samples with primers 5′-ATG TCC ATT GAG TCA GGT CC-3′ and 5′-TGC ATT TTC ATC CTC GTC C-3′. When the first-round PCR product was not strong enough for sequencing, a second-round PCR was performed using inner primers 5′-GGT CCT GAC ATT CCA TTA CC-3′ and 5′-CCT CTA CTT CAA ACC AGC CT-3′ when necessary ′ (S1 Table). Each PCR was conducted in a 50-μL reaction mixture containing 1 unit of Phusion Hot Start II High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA), 200 μM of dNTPs and 0.25 μM of each primer. An aliquot of 5 μL of extracted DNA was added as template. The thermal cycling began with a 30-sec initial denaturation and enzyme activation at 98°C, followed by 35 cycles of 10-sec denaturation at 98°C, 30-sec annealing at 62°C and 100-sec extension at 72°C, and ended with an 10-min final extension at 72°C. When long-fragment PCR was not successful, short-fragment PCR was performed with primer pairs E6/E7 (5′-TGC ACT ACA CGA CCG GTT A-3′ and 5′-CAT CCT CGT CCT CTG AAA TG-3′), L1A (5′-ATG TCC ATT GAG TCA GGT CC-3′ and 5′-GCA CAG GGT CAC CTA AGG TA-3′), L1B (5′-AGG ATG GGG ACA TGG TAG AT-3′ and 5′-CAC AGA CAA TTA CCC AAC AGA C-3′) and LCR (5′-GTC TGC ATC TTT GGA GGA CA-3′ and 5′-TGC GTT AGC TAC ACT GTG TTC-3′), respectively. When necessary, a second-round PCR, using inner primers E6/E7 (5′-TTA CCG TAC CCA CAA CCA CT-3′ and 5′-CCT CTA CTT CAA ACC AGC CT-3′), L1A (5′-GGT CCT GAC ATT CCA TTA CC-3′ and 5′-GGG CAC ATC ACT TTT ACT AGC-3′), L1B (5′-ACA GGA TTT GGT TGC ATG G-3′ and 5′-TTC TTT GTG GAG GTA CGT GG-3′) and LCR (5′-TTT GTT ACA GGC AGG GCT AC-3′ and 5′-CGT TTT CGG TTA CAC CCT A-3′), was performed (S2 Table). Each PCR was conducted in a 30-μL reaction mixture containing 0.75 unit of HotStarTaq Plus DNA Polymerase (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), 200 μM of dNTPs and 0.25 μM of each primer. An aliquot of 3 μL of extracted DNA was added as template. The thermal cycling began with a 5-min initial denaturation and enzyme activation at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 1-min denaturation at 94°C, 1-min annealing at 58°C and 40-sec extension at 72°C, and ended with an 8-min final extension at 72°C. PCR products were sequenced from both directions and analyzed using Seq-Scape software (version 2.5, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Repeated sequencing was performed as a confirmation when mutations occurred only once.

Phylogenetic tree construction

A maximum-likelihood tree was constructed using MEGA6 (Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis software program, version 6.0; http://www.megasoftware.net) [13]. The tree was comprised of concatenated E6-E7-L1-LCR sequences of unique HPV52 strains collected in this study and from a published reference strain of each lineage (A1: X74481, A2: HQ537739, B1: HQ537740, B2: HQ537743, C1: HQ537744, C2: HQ537746, D: HQ537748). Bootstrap values of key nodes were generated by 1000 resamplings. To root the tree, HPV67 prototype sequences (NCBI accession no. NC_004710) were set as the outgroup.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using a commercially available statistical software package (SPSS statistical software version 18.0 [SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA]). Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze categorical data. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of cervical samples

Of the 91 cervical cytology samples, 40 (44.0%) showed normal pathologic findings (normal squamous cell epithelium; Table 1). We separated pre-malignant lesions into ‘low-grade lesions’ and ‘high-grade lesions’. ‘Low-grade lesions’ (n = 22) included ASCUS (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) and LGSIL (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions), while ‘high-grade lesions’ (n = 21) included HGSIL (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions), CIN3 (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3) and CIS (carcinoma in situ). For malignant lesions, seven (7.7%) squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) were included.

Lineage identification

Altogether, four HPV52 variant lineages were identified based on the phylogenetic tree topology (Fig 1). Lineages A, B and C were closely related, while lineage D was relatively distant. Lineage B was most frequently detected (86.8%, 79 of 91 samples; Table 1). The majority of high-grade lesions (80.9%, 17 of 21 samples) belonged to lineage B, and the remaining high-grade lesions belonged to lineage C (19.1%). Lineage B harbored all of the seven SCCs and their association was significant (P = 0.02).
Fig 1

HPV52 variant lineage distribution of study samples.

(A) Lineages A (sublineages: A1 and A2), B (sublineage: B2), C (sublineage: C2) and D were detected. (B) A phylogenetic tree was constructed from 57 HPV52 variants using concatenated L1, LCR, E6 and E7. A maximum-likelihood tree was constructed using the program, MEGA6. Bootstrap values of key nodes generated by 1,000 resamplings are shown. The length of the scale bar represents 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position. To root the tree, HPV67 prototype sequences (NCBI accession no. NC_004710) were set as outgroup. The GenBank accession no. of study samples are KY077824-KY077901.

HPV52 variant lineage distribution of study samples.

(A) Lineages A (sublineages: A1 and A2), B (sublineage: B2), C (sublineage: C2) and D were detected. (B) A phylogenetic tree was constructed from 57 HPV52 variants using concatenated L1, LCR, E6 and E7. A maximum-likelihood tree was constructed using the program, MEGA6. Bootstrap values of key nodes generated by 1,000 resamplings are shown. The length of the scale bar represents 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position. To root the tree, HPV67 prototype sequences (NCBI accession no. NC_004710) were set as outgroup. The GenBank accession no. of study samples are KY077824-KY077901.

HPV52 sequence variations

In this study, 40.6% (3226 nucleotides) of the HPV52 genome (7942bps, X74481) was sequenced (S3–S6 Tables). Nine E6 variants with 11 nucleotide positions showing sequence polymorphisms were identified, encompassing three nonsynonymous mutations (S3 Table). Five variants with 12 nucleotide positions showing sequence polymorphisms with seven nonsynonymous mutations were identified in E7 (S4 Table). L1 harbored 26 variants and 54 nucleotide sequence polymorphisms with 11 nonsynonymous mutations (S5 Table). The noncoding LCR was the most heterogeneous, encompassing 38 variants showing 87 nucleotide sequence variations (S6 Table). An analysis of sequences for the E6, E7, L1 and LCR genes suggested that HPV52 harbors lineage-specific variations. Lineage B, the most frequently detected lineage, harbored a number of lineage-specific variations (Table 2). Of the 91 samples, K93R (A379G), the most frequently detected nonsynonymous mutation (85.71%) in E6, was only found in lineage B. In addition, a novel mutation, 7935_7936 insT in LCR was significantly associated with lineage B (P < 0.0001). Lineage C also harbored lineage-specific variations (Table 3), of which an E6 nonsynonymous mutation (L83V, concurrent mutations of C348G and G350T) and five E7 nonsynonymous mutations, S52D (concurrent mutations of A706G and G707A), Y55D (T727G), H61Y (C733T), D64N (G742A) and L99R (T848G), showed significant associations with the lineage (P < 0.0001).
Table 2

List of nucleotide variations associated with HPV52 lineage B.

Non-B lineages (n = 12)B lineage (n = 79)P value*Adjust odds ratio (95% CI)P value
E6 nucleotide change
G350T779<0.000177.31 (12.39 –Infinity)<0.0001
A379G078<0.0001186.39 (48.04 –Infinity)<0.0001
E7 nucleotide change
C751T079<0.000192.87 (35.35 –Infinity)<0.0001
A801G779<0.000177.31 (12.39 –Infinity)<0.0001
L1 nucleotide change
A5771G076<0.0001350.56 (59.44–Infinity)<0.0001
T5972C078<0.0001186.39 (48.04– Infinity)<0.0001
G6110A079<0.000192.87 (35.35–Infinity)<0.0001
G6218A779<0.000177.31 (12.39–Infinity)<0.0001
T6710G079<0.000192.87 (35.35–Infinity)<0.0001
T6764C079<0.000192.87 (35.35–Infinity)<0.0001
A6794G078<0.0001186.25 (47.99–Infinity)<0.0001
C6824T079<0.000192.87 (35.35–Infinity)<0.0001
C6917A778<0.000184.04 (7.25–974.61)0.0004
G7052A278<0.0001166.80 (21.96–Infinity)<0.0001
LCR nucleotide change
G7168C6710.00258.89 (2.31–34.20)0.0015
C7207A7730.00519.32 (2.17–40.10)0.0027
G7371T477<0.0001171.31 (14.34–Infinity)<0.0001
G7622A779<0.000177.31 (12.39–Infinity)<0.0001
T7624G779<0.000177.31 (12.39–Infinity)<0.0001
A7657C079<0.000192.87 (35.35–Infinity)<0.0001
T7659C679<0.0001105.84 (17.45–Infinity)<0.0001
G7712C779<0.000177.31 (12.39–Infinity)<0.0001
G7861A779<0.000177.31 (12.39–Infinity)<0.0001
A7865G177<0.0001225.24 (41.70–Infinity)<0.0001
7935_7936 insT779<0.000177.31 (12.39–Infinity)<0.0001
A7938G148<0.000118.05 (2.19–148.62)0.0071
T13C079<0.000192.87 (35.35–Infinity)<0.0001

Statistical analyses were performed using *Fisher's exact test, †multivariable logistic regression (age-adjusted).

Table 3

List of nucleotide variations associated with HPV52 lineage C.

Non-C lineages (n = 85)C lineage (n = 6)P value*Adjust odds ratio (95% CI)P value
E6 nucleotide change
A530G06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
C348G and G350T03<0.000152.83 (7.31–Infinity)0.0011
E7 nucleotide change
T573A06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
C662T06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
A706G and G707A06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
T727G06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
C733T06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
G742A06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
T848G06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
L1 nucleotide change
T5578C03<0.0001140.86 (16.81–Infinity)0.0001
G5720A03<0.000152.83 (7.31–Infinity)0.0011
A5909G05<0.0001155.81 (26.17–Infinity)<0.0001
G6083A06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
C6443T06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
G6698A06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001
G7112A06<0.000141.78 (14.64–Infinity)<0.0001

Statistical analyses were performed using *Fisher's exact test, †multivariable logistic regression (age-adjusted).

Statistical analyses were performed using *Fisher's exact test, †multivariable logistic regression (age-adjusted). Statistical analyses were performed using *Fisher's exact test, †multivariable logistic regression (age-adjusted).

Discussion

HPVs are circular double-stranded DNA viruses that consist of heterogeneous variants with different pathogenicities [4, 14]. HPV52 is one of the most frequently detected carcinogenic high-risk genotypes in East Asia [15-17] and is one of the genotypes targeted by the recent, USA FDA-approved HPV 9-valent vaccine [9]. However, only a few studies on the pathogenicity of HPV52 are available [18]. In this regard, we attempted to achieve three aims. Firstly, we aimed at identifying HPV52 variants and lineages based on E6, E7, L1 and LCR sequences. Secondly, we attempted to delineate lineage-specific variations. Lastly, we sought to examine the risk association of various lineages, variants and mutations. As a result, we identified four HPV52 variant lineages (A, B, C and D), with lineage B (86.8%) being the most frequently detected, followed by lineages C (6.6%), A (5.5%), and D (1.1%). By further analyzing the two most frequently detected lineages, we found distinct sequence variations in each lineage. Of note, one of lineage B-specific mutations was found to associate with a higher risk for cervical cancer. Our findings of the two most frequently detected lineages in HPV52, B and C, also confirm previous observations [19, 20]. These two lineages are associated with high-grade lesions [19, 21], and we have shown that they harbor a number of lineage-specific variations (Tables 2 and 3). Lineage B-specific mutations included the most frequently detected nonsynonymous mutation K93R (A379G) in E6, while lineage C-specific mutations included an E6 nonsynonymous mutation (L83V, concurrent mutations of C348G and G350T) and five E7 nonsynonymous mutations, S52D (concurrent mutations of A706G and G707A), Y55D (T727G), H61Y (C733T), D64N (G742A) and L99R (T848G)). Our findings suggest that lineage-specific mutations may contribute to the carcinogenicity of each HPV52 lineage. E6 is an oncogene that interacts with a well-known tumor suppressor, TP53, increasing the risk for the accumulation of genetic changes [22] and inhibiting cellular responses such as cell cycle arrest, induction of apoptosis and DNA damage repair [23, 24]. K93R (A379G) is a nonsynonymous mutation located in the E6 oncogene, which may have a specific role in carcinogenesis: it is not only the most frequently detected variation [25], but is also independently associated with high-grade lesions [26]. An alteration at nucleotide position 350 in E6 was found for both lineages B and C. However, lineage C harbored an additional alteration at nucleotide position 348, yielding a nonsynonymous mutation, L83V. L83V have been reported not only in HPV52, but also in HPV16 and HPV33 [25, 27, 28]. In addition, an association of HPV16 L83V with high-grade lesions has been shown [29], suggesting that it may contribute to the pathogenicity of lineage C [19]. It is noticeable that E7 nonsynonymous mutations (S52D, 55D, H61Y, D64N and L99R) were harbored by lineage C, but not by lineage B. E7 interacts with the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, causing uncontrolled cell division and inactivating its function as a tumor suppressor [30, 31].

Conclusions

HPV52 is the second to fifth most frequently detected high-risk HPV genotype in Korea [15, 32–34]. Our data demonstrated for the first time that HPV52 lineages (B and C) circulating in Korea harbor distinct genetic alterations that may affect pathogenicity. We also observed that most of the cervical samples (ranging from normal cervix to SCC) were infected with HPV52 lineages B or C that carried putative high-risk mutations. Our findings may provide a useful basis to understand the heterogeneity of HPV52 variants in Korea, and to assist the development of diagnostic assays and vaccines.

Primers for HPV-52 long-fragment PCR amplification.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Primers for HPV-52 short-fragment PCR amplification.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Nucleotide sequence variations of HPV52 E6.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Nucleotide sequence variations of HPV52 E7.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Nucleotide sequence variations of HPV52 L1.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Nucleotide sequence variations of HPV52 LCR.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

1.  A population-based prospective study of carcinogenic human papillomavirus variant lineages, viral persistence, and cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Zigui Chen; Sholom Wacholder; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Rob Desalle; Brian Befano; Kai Yu; Mahboobeh Safaeian; Mark E Sherman; Jorge Morales; Diego Guillen; Mario Alfaro; Martha Hutchinson; Diane Solomon; Philip E Castle; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Cosette M Wheeler; Nicolas Wentzensen; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study.

Authors:  Silvia de Sanjose; Wim Gv Quint; Laia Alemany; Daan T Geraets; Jo Ellen Klaustermeier; Belen Lloveras; Sara Tous; Ana Felix; Luis Eduardo Bravo; Hai-Rim Shin; Carlos S Vallejos; Patricia Alonso de Ruiz; Marcus Aurelho Lima; Nuria Guimera; Omar Clavero; Maria Alejo; Antonio Llombart-Bosch; Chou Cheng-Yang; Silvio Alejandro Tatti; Elena Kasamatsu; Ermina Iljazovic; Michael Odida; Rodrigo Prado; Muhieddine Seoud; Magdalena Grce; Alp Usubutun; Asha Jain; Gustavo Adolfo Hernandez Suarez; Luis Estuardo Lombardi; Aekunbiola Banjo; Clara Menéndez; Efrén Javier Domingo; Julio Velasco; Ashrafun Nessa; Saibua C Bunnag Chichareon; You Lin Qiao; Enrique Lerma; Suzanne M Garland; Toshiyuki Sasagawa; Annabelle Ferrera; Doudja Hammouda; Luciano Mariani; Adela Pelayo; Ivo Steiner; Esther Oliva; Chris Jlm Meijer; Waleed Fahad Al-Jassar; Eugenia Cruz; Thomas C Wright; Ana Puras; Cecilia Ladines Llave; Maria Tzardi; Theodoros Agorastos; Victoria Garcia-Barriola; Christine Clavel; Jaume Ordi; Miguel Andújar; Xavier Castellsagué; Gloria I Sánchez; Andrzej Marcin Nowakowski; Jacob Bornstein; Nubia Muñoz; F Xavier Bosch
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  High grade cervical lesions are caused preferentially by non-European variants of HPVs 16 and 18.

Authors:  Laura Sichero; Silvaneide Ferreira; Helen Trottier; Eliane Duarte-Franco; Alex Ferenczy; Eduardo Luis Franco; Luisa Lina Villa
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  The clinical importance of the nomenclature, evolution and taxonomy of human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  E6 and E7 variants of human papillomavirus-16 and -52 in Japan, the Philippines, and Vietnam.

Authors:  Azumi Ishizaki; Kaori Matsushita; Huyen Thi Thanh Hoang; Dorothy M Agdamag; Cuong Hung Nguyen; Vuong Thi Tran; Toshiyuki Sasagawa; Kunikazu Saikawa; Raphael Lihana; Hung Viet Pham; Xiuqiong Bi; Van Thanh Ta; Thuc Van Pham; Hiroshi Ichimura
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.327

7.  Viral polymorphism in human papillomavirus types 33 and 35 and persistent and transient infection in the genital tract of women.

Authors:  Simon Gagnon; Catherine Hankins; Cécile Tremblay; Pierre Forest; Karina Pourreaux; François Coutlée
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 8.  Epidemiology and natural history of human papillomavirus infections and type-specific implications in cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  F Xavier Bosch; Ann N Burchell; Mark Schiffman; Anna R Giuliano; Silvia de Sanjose; Laia Bruni; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Susanne Kruger Kjaer; Nubia Muñoz
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  Human papillomavirus-induced carcinogenesis and the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

Authors:  Martin Scheffner; Noel J Whitaker
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 15.707

10.  Meta-analysis on prevalence and attribution of human papillomavirus types 52 and 58 in cervical neoplasia worldwide.

Authors:  Paul K S Chan; Wendy C S Ho; Martin C W Chan; Martin C S Wong; Apple C M Yeung; Josette S Y Chor; Mamie Hui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Whole-genome analysis of human papillomavirus genotypes 52 and 58 isolated from Japanese women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yuri Tenjimbayashi; Mamiko Onuki; Yusuke Hirose; Seiichiro Mori; Yoshiyuki Ishii; Takamasa Takeuchi; Nobutaka Tasaka; Toyomi Satoh; Tohru Morisada; Takashi Iwata; Shingo Miyamoto; Koji Matsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Iwao Kukimoto
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.965

2.  Mathematical Modeling and Computational Prediction of High-Risk Types of Human Papillomaviruses.

Authors:  Junchao Zhang; Kechao Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Genetic and Epigenetic Variations of HPV52 in Cervical Precancer.

Authors:  Katharine J Bee; Ana Gradissimo; Zigui Chen; Ariana Harari; Mark Schiffman; Tina Raine-Bennett; Philip E Castle; Megan Clarke; Nicolas Wentzensen; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.