Literature DB >> 27977404

Sensitivity and specificity of different methods for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes screening: is the oral glucose tolerance test still the standard?

Catherine Mainguy, Gabriel Bellon, Véronique Delaup, Tiphanie Ginoux, Behrouz Kassai-Koupai, Stéphane Mazur, Muriel Rabilloud, Laurent Remontet, Philippe Reix.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a late cystic fibrosis (CF)-associated comorbidity whose prevalence is increasing sharply lifelong. Guidelines for glucose metabolism (GM) monitoring rely on the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, this test is neither sensitive nor specific. The aim of this study was to compare sensitivity and specificity of different methods for GM monitoring in children and adolescents with CF.
METHODS: Continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), used as the reference method, was compared with the OGTT, intravenous glucose tolerance test (IGTT), homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), homeostasis model assessment index of β-cell function (HOMA-%B) and glycated haemoglobin A1C. Patients were classified into three groups according to CGMS: normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and diabetes mellitus (DM).
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (median age: 13.1 years) were recruited. According to CGMS, 11 had DM, 12 IGT and six NGT, whereas OGTT identified three patients with DM and five with IGT. While 13 of 27 had insulin deficiency according to IGTT, there was 19 of 28 according to HOMA-%B. According to HOMA-IR, 12 of 28 had insulin resistance. HOMA-%B was the most sensitive method for CFRD screening [sensitivity 91% (95% CI), specificity 47% (95% CI) and negative predictive value 89% (95% CI)].
CONCLUSIONS: OGTT showed the weak capacity to diagnose DM in CF and should no longer be considered as the reference method for CFRD screening in patients with CF. In our study, HOMA-%B showed promising metrics for CFRD screening. Finally, CGMS revealed that pathological glucose excursions were frequent even early in life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27977404     DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2016-0184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0334-018X            Impact factor:   1.634


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes.

Authors:  Kayani Kayani; Raihan Mohammed; Hasan Mohiaddin
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.555

2.  The Beta-Cell Function and Glucose Profile of Newly Diagnosed Acromegalic Patients with Normal Glucose Tolerance.

Authors:  Quanya Sun; Xiaoqing Li; Peili Chen; Lili Chen; Xiaolong Zhao
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.257

3.  Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: too early or too late?

Authors:  Aleksandar Sovtic
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  Comparison of continuous glucose monitoring to reference standard oral glucose tolerance test for the detection of dysglycemia in cystic Fibrosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Shanal Kumar; Michael Pallin; Georgia Soldatos; Helena Teede
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2022-09-27

Review 5.  Screening Methods for Diagnosing Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Vera Dóra Izsák; Alexandra Soós; Zsolt Szakács; Péter Hegyi; Márk Félix Juhász; Orsolya Varannai; Ágnes Rita Martonosi; Mária Földi; Alexandra Kozma; Zsolt Vajda; James Am Shaw; Andrea Párniczky
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-03-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.